Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?
Abstract
Current international climate negotiations seek to catalyze global emissions reductions through a system of nationally determined country-level emissions reduction targets that would be regularly updated. These “Intended Nationally Determined Contributions” (INDCs) would constitute the core of mitigation commitments under any agreement struck at the upcoming Paris Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1). With INDCs now reported from more than 150 countries and covering around 90% of global emissions, we can begin to assess the role of this round of INDCs in facilitating or frustrating achievement of longer-term climate goals. In this context, it is important to understand what these INDCs collectively deliver in terms of two objectives. First, how much do they reduce the probability of the highest levels of global mean surface temperature change? Second, how much do they improve the odds of achieving the international goal of limiting temperature change to under 2°C relative to preindustrial levels (2)? Although much discussion has focused on the latter objective (3–5), the former is equally important when viewing climate mitigation from a risk-management perspective.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber?Sign In
Supplementary Material
File (aad5761_fawcett-sm.pdf)
References and Notes
1
UNFCCC, INDCs as communicated by Parties (UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany, 2015); http://bit.ly/INDCsubmissions.
2
UNFCCC, in Report of the Conference of the Parties on its 18th session, Addendum, Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its 18th session, Doha, Qatar, from 26 November to 8 December 2012 (FCCC/CP/2012/8/Add.1, UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany, 2012), pp. 1–37.
3
UNFCCC, Synthesis Report on the Aggregate Effect of the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (UNFCCC, Bonn, Germany, 2015); http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/07.pdf.
4
Climate Action Tracker, How close are INDCs to 2° and 1.5°C pathways? (CAT, 2015); http://bit.ly/EmissionsGap.
5
Climate Interactive, https://www.climateinteractive.org/.
6
Collins M., et al., in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013), pp. 1029–1136.
7
IPCC, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC (IPCC, Geneva, 2014).
8
Waldhoff S. T., Fawcett A. A., Clim. Change 107, 635 (2011).
9
GCAM Wiki documentation (2015); https://wiki.umd.edu/gcam/index.php/Main_Page.
10
Meinshausen M., Raper S. C. B., Wigley T. M. L., Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1417 (2011).
11
Rogelj J., et al., Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 031003 (2014).
12
IPCC, AR5 Scenario Database (IPCC, Geneva, 2015); http://bit.ly/Ar5Scenario.
13
Iyer G., et al., Technol. For. Soc. Change 90 (PA), 103 (2015).
14
Clarke L., et al., in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC, , Edenhofer O., et al., Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2014), pp. 413–510.
15
Riahi K., et al., Technol. For. Soc. Change 90 (PA), 8 (2015).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In

Science
Volume 350 | Issue 6265
4 December 2015
4 December 2015
Copyright
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Article versions
You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Submission history
Published in print: 4 December 2015
Acknowledgments
G.C.I., L.E.C., J.A.E., H.C.M, M.J., and A.M. and were partially supported by the Global Technology Strategy Program, a research program at JGCRI. N.E.H. was supported by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Analysis of mitigation potential and levels of national mitigation action related to the conclusions of this paper was supported by the U.S. Department of State (IAA 19318814Y0012) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (IAA DW.8992406301). The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government, the Department of State, the EPA, or CEQ, and no official endorsement should be inferred.
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Altmetrics
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Cited by
- Sustainable process integration of electrification technologies with industrial energy systems, Energy, 239, (122060), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122060
- Limiting global warming to below 1.5 °C from 2 °C: An energy-system-based multi-model analysis for China, Energy Economics, 100, (105355), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105355
- Improving reduced complexity model assessment and usability, Nature Climate Change, 11, 1, (1-3), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00973-9
- Evaluating the economic impact of water scarcity in a changing world, Nature Communications, 12, 1, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22194-0
- HOW MUCH COULD ARTICLE 6 ENHANCE NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTION AMBITION TOWARD PARIS AGREEMENT GOALS THROUGH ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY?, Climate Change Economics, 12, 02, (2150007), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1142/S201000782150007X
- The potential land requirements and related land use change emissions of solar energy, Scientific Reports, 11, 1, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82042-5
- Models for integrating climate objectives in forest policy: Towards adaptation-first?, Land Use Policy, 104, (105357), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105357
- Assessing the effects of labor market dynamics on CO2 emissions in global value chains, Science of The Total Environment, 768, (144486), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144486
- Mechanistic insights into carbon dioxide utilization by superoxide ion generated electrochemically in ionic liquid electrolyte, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 23, 2, (1114-1126), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP04903D
- Beyond RCP8.5: Marginal mitigation using quasi-representative concentration pathways, Journal of Econometrics, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.06.007
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Get Access
Log in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
- Become a AAAS Member
- Activate your Account
- Purchase Access to Other Journals in the Science Family
- Account Help
Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options
Purchase digital access to this article
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
Download PDF





