Is low fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and consumption
Abstract
Longer lives and fertility far below the replacement level of 2.1 births per woman are leading to rapid population aging in many countries. Many observers are concerned that aging will adversely affect public finances and standards of living. Analysis of newly available National Transfer Accounts data for 40 countries shows that fertility well above replacement would typically be most beneficial for government budgets. However, fertility near replacement would be most beneficial for standards of living when the analysis includes the effects of age structure on families as well as governments. And fertility below replacement would maximize per capita consumption when the cost of providing capital for a growing labor force is taken into account. Although low fertility will indeed challenge government programs and very low fertility undermines living standards, we find that moderately low fertility and population decline favor the broader material standard of living.
Adjusting to fewer kids and more elderly
In many countries, populations are aging as retirees live longer, and the rates of population growth have declined as fewer babies are born. These demographic changes have evoked alarmist predictions that future retirement pensions will need to be curtailed, constraining future generations' purchasing power. Lee et al. point out that compensatory factors, such as more women working more years, along with a better educated workforce, may mitigate these demographic impacts (see the Perspective by Smeeding).
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber?Sign In
Supplementary Material
Summary
Materials and Methods
Tables S1 and S2
Resources
File (lee.sm.pdf)
References and Notes
1
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision (United Nations, New York, 2013).
2
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, World Population Policies Database (United Nations, New York, 2013).
3
D. E. Bloom, D. Canning, J. Sevilla, The Demographic Dividend: A New Perspective on the Economic Consequences of Population Change (RAND, Santa Monica, CA, 2002).
4
Arthur W. B., McNicoll G., Samuelson, population and intergenerational transfers. Int. Econ. Rev. 19, 241–246 (1978).
5
R. J. Willis, in Economics of Changing Age Distributions in Developed Countries, R. D. Lee, W. B. Arthur, G. Rodgers, Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1988), pp. 106–138.
6
R. D. Lee, in Demography of Aging, L. G. Martin, S. H. Preston, Eds. (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1994), pp. 8–49.
7
R. D. Lee, Population, age structure, intergenerational transfers, and wealth: A new approach, with applications to the United States. J. Human Res. 29, 1027–1063 (1994).
8
R. Lee, A. Mason, Eds., Population Aging and the Generational Economy: A Global Perspective (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2011).
9
Information on materials and methods is available on Science Online.
10
A. Mason, R. Lee, A.-C. Tung, M. S. Lai, T. Miller, in Developments in the Economics of Aging, D. Wise, Ed. (National Bureau of Economic Research Series The Economics of Aging, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2009), pp. 89–126.
11
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, National Transfer Accounts Manual: Measuring and Analyzing the Generational Economy (United Nations, New York, 2013).
12
Espenshade T. J., Bouvier L. F., Arthur W. B., Immigration and the stable population model. Demography 19, 125–133 (1982).
13
J. R. Goldstein, in International Handbook of Population Aging, Peter Uhlenberg, Ed. (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2009), pp. 7–17.
14
Schmertmann C. P., Immigrant’s ages and the structure of stationary populations with below-replacement fertility. Demography 29, 595–612 (1992).
15
Samuelson P., The optimum growth rate for population. Int. Econ. Rev. 16, 531–538 (1975).
16
Samuelson P., The optimum growth rate for population: Agreement and evaluations. Int. Econ. Rev. 17, 516–525 (1976).
17
Deardorff A. V., The optimum growth rate for population: Comment. Int. Econ. Rev. 17, 510–514 (1976).
18
Calvo G., Obstfeld M., Optimal time-consistent fiscal policy with finite lifetimes. Econometrica 56, 411–432 (1988).
19
Cutler D., Poterba J., Sheiner L., Summers L., Akerlof G. A., An aging society: Opportunity or challenge? Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. 1990, 1–73 (1990).
20
Backus D., Henriksen E., Storesletten K., Taxes and the global allocation of capital. J. Monet. Econ. 55, 48–61 (2008).
21
R. C. Feenstra, R. Inklaar, M. P. Timmer, The Next Generation of the Penn World Table, www.ggdc.net/pwt; accessed 22 June 2014.
22
T. Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 2014).
23
Lee R., Mason A., Fertility, human capital, and economic growth over the demographic transition. Eur. J. Popul. 26, 159–182 (2010).
24
Lee R. D., Lee S.-H., Mason A., Charting the economic life cycle. Popul. Dev. Rev. 34 (suppl.), 208–237 (2008).
25
A. Coale, The Growth and Structure of Human Populations: A Mathematical Investigation (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1972).
26
Preston S. H., Relations between individual life cycles and population characteristics. Am. Sociol. Rev. 47, 253–264 (1982).
27
Samuelson P., An exact consumption loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. J. Polit. Econ. 66, 467–482 (1958).
28
Solow R. M., A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 70, 65–94 (1956).
29
Bermingham J. R., Immigration: Not a solution to problems of population decline and aging. Popul. Environ. 22, 355–363 (2001).
30
J. P. Smith, B. Edmonston, Eds., The New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of Immigration (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1997).
31
Storesletten K., Sustaining fiscal policy through immigration. J. Polit. Econ. 108, 300–323 (2000).
32
Auerbach A. J., Oreopoulos P., Analyzing the fiscal impact of U.S. immigration. Am. Econ. Rev. 89, 176–180 (1999).
33
Bonin H., Raffelhüschen B., Walliser J., Can immigration alleviate the demographic burden? FinanzArchiv. Publ. Fin. Anal. 57, 1–21 (2000).
34
Lee S. H., Mason A., International migration, population age structure, and economic growth in Asia. Asian Pac. Migr. J. 20, 195–213 (2011).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Science
Volume 346 • Issue 6206 • 10 October 2014
Pages: 229 - 234
History
Received: 8 January 2014
Accepted: 26 August 2014
Copyright
Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
