Advertisement

Using earthquakes to find earthquakes

Earthquake catalogs elucidate the behavior of faults and allow for rough estimates of when large earthquakes might occur. Cataloging small earthquakes is challenging because the small signal is often indistinguishable from noise. Ross et al. used a template-matching algorithm to find almost two million tiny earthquakes previously missed by other earthquake-logging techniques in Southern California (see the Perspective by Brodsky). This more-complete catalog can be used to better understand faults, earthquake reoccurrence, and other geophysical processes.
Science, this issue p. 767; see also p. 736

Abstract

Earthquakes follow a well-known power-law size relation, with smaller events occurring much more often than larger events. Earthquake catalogs are thus dominated by small earthquakes yet are still missing a much larger number of even smaller events because of signal fidelity issues. To overcome these limitations, we applied a template-matching detection technique to the entire waveform archive of the regional seismic network in Southern California. This effort resulted in a catalog with 1.81 million earthquakes, a 10-fold increase, which provides important insights into the geometry of fault zones at depth, foreshock behavior and nucleation processes, and earthquake-triggering mechanisms. The rich detail resolved in this type of catalog will facilitate the next generation of analyses of earthquakes and faults.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S9
References (3542)

Resources

File (aaw6888_ross_sm.pdf)
File (pap.pdf)

References and Notes

1
F. Omori, On the aftershocks of earthquakes. J. Coll. Sci. Imperial Univ. Tokyo 7, 111–120 (1894).
2
C. F. Richter, An instrumental earthquake magnitude scale. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 25, 1–32 (1935).
3
B. Gutenberg, C. F. Richter, Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 34, 185–188 (1944).
4
P. M. Shearer, Parallel fault strands at 9-km depth resolved on the Imperial Fault, Southern California. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 19-1–19-4 (2002).
5
E. Fukuyama, W. L. Ellsworth, F. Waldhauser, A. Kubo, Detailed fault structure of the 2000 western Tottori, Japan, earthquake sequence. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 1468–1478 (2003).
6
Z. E. Ross, E. Hauksson, Y. Ben-Zion, Abundant off-fault seismicity and orthogonal structures in the San Jacinto fault zone. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601946 (2017).
7
R. B. Lohman, J. J. McGuire, Earthquake swarms driven by aseismic creep in the Salton Trough, California. J. Geophys. Res. 112, B04405 (2007).
8
D. R. Shelly, W. L. Ellsworth, D. P. Hill, Fluid-faulting evolution in high definition: Connecting fault structure and frequency-magnitude variations during the 2014 Long Valley Caldera, California, earthquake swarm. J. Geophys. Res. 121, 1776–1795 (2016).
9
J. Dieterich, A constitutive law for rate of earthquake production and its application to earthquake clustering. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 2601–2618 (1994).
10
E. S. Cochran, J. E. Vidale, S. Tanaka, Earth tides can trigger shallow thrust fault earthquakes. Science 306, 1164–1166 (2004).
11
S. A. Miller, C. Collettini, L. Chiaraluce, M. Cocco, M. Barchi, B. J. P. Kaus, Aftershocks driven by a high-pressure CO2 source at depth. Nature 427, 724–727 (2004).
12
S. J. Gibbons, F. Ringdal, The detection of low magnitude seismic events using array-based waveform correlation. Geophys. J. Int. 165, 149–166 (2006).
13
D. R. Shelly, G. C. Beroza, S. Ide, Non-volcanic tremor and low-frequency earthquake swarms. Nature 446, 305–307 (2007).
14
Z. Peng, P. Zhao, Migration of early aftershocks following the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. Nat. Geosci. 2, 877–881 (2009).
15
A. Kato, J. Fukuda, S. Nakagawa, K. Obara, Foreshock migration preceding the 2016 Mw 7.0 Kumamoto earthquake, Japan. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 8945–8953 (2016).
16
D. T. Trugman, P. M. Shearer, A hierarchical clustering algorithm for relative earthquake relocation, with application to the Spanish Springs and Sheldon, Nevada, earthquake sequences. Seismol. Res. Lett. 88, 379–391 (2017).
17
E. Hauksson, W. Z. Yang, P. M. Shearer, Waveform relocated earthquake catalog for Southern California (1981 to June 2011). Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 102, 2239–2244 (2012).
18
W. L. Ellsworth, F. Bulut, Nucleation of the 1999 Izmit earthquake by a triggered cascade of foreshocks. Nat. Geosci. 11, 531–535 (2018).
19
E. Hauksson, J. Stock, R. Bilham, M. Boese, X. Chen, E. J. Fielding, J. Galetzka, K. W. Hudnut, K. Hutton, L. M. Jones, H. Kanamori, P. M. Shearer, J. Steidl, J. Treiman, S. Wei, W. Yang, Report on the August 2012 Brawley Earthquake Swarm in Imperial Valley, Southern California. Seismol. Res. Lett. 84, 177–189 (2013).
20
S. Wei, J.-P. Avouac, K. W. Hudnut, A. Donnellan, J. W. Parker, R. W. Graves, D. Helmberger, E. Fielding, Z. Liu, F. Cappa, M. Eneva, The 2012 Brawley swarm triggered by injection-induced aseismic slip. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 422, 115–125 (2015).
21
R. S. Stein, The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence. Nature 402, 605–609 (1999).
22
K. R. Felzer, E. E. Brodsky, Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress. Nature 441, 735–738 (2006).
23
D. P. Hill, P. A. Reasenberg, A. Michael, W. J. Arabaz, G. Beroza, D. Brumbaugh, J. N. Brune, R. Castro, S. Davis, D. Depolo, W. L. Ellsworth, J. Gomberg, S. Harmsen, L. House, S. M. Jackson, M. J. S. Johnston, L. Jones, R. Keller, S. Malone, L. Munguia, S. Nava, J. C. Pechmann, A. Sanford, R. W. Simpson, R. B. Smith, M. Stark, M. Stickney, A. Vidal, S. Walter, V. Wong, J. Zollweg, Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, earthquake. Science 260, 1617–1623 (1993).
24
D. Kilb, J. Gomberg, P. Bodin, Triggering of earthquake aftershocks by dynamic stresses. Nature 408, 570–574 (2000).
25
J. Gomberg, P. A. Reasenberg, P. Bodin, R. A. Harris, Earthquake triggering by seismic waves following the Landers and Hector Mine earthquakes. Nature 411, 462–466 (2001).
26
S. G. Prejean, D. P. Hill, E. E. Brodsky, S. E. Hough, M. J. S. Johnston, S. D. Malone, D. H. Oppenheimer, A. M. Pitt, K. B. Richards-Dinger, Remotely triggered seismicity on the United States West Coast following the Mw 7.9 Denali fault earthquake. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, S348–S359 (2004).
27
S. J. Wei, E. Fielding, S. Leprince, A. Sladen, J.-P. Avouac, D. Helmberger, E. Hauksson, R. Chu, M. Simons, K. Hudnut, T. Herring, R. Briggs, Superficial simplicity of the 2010 El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake of Baja California in Mexico. Nat. Geosci. 4, 615–618 (2011).
28
Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials.
29
X. Meng, Z. Peng, Seismicity rate changes in the Salton Sea Geothermal Field and the San Jacinto Fault Zone after the 2010 Mw 7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah earthquake. Geophys. J. Int. 197, 1750–1762 (2014).
30
Z. E. Ross, C. Rollins, E. S. Cochran, E. Hauksson, J.-P. Avouac, Y. Ben-Zion, Aftershocks driven by afterslip and fluid pressure sweeping through a fault-fracture mesh. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 8260–8267 (2017).
31
W. Zhu, G. C. Beroza, PhaseNet: A deep-neural-network-based seismic arrival-time picking method. Geophys. J. Int. 216, 261–273 (2019).
32
Z. E. Ross, M.-A. Meier, E. Hauksson, T. H. Heaton, Generalized seismic phase detection with deep learning. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 108, 2894–2901 (2018).
33
Data are available from the Southern California Seismic Network (https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/CI), operated by the California Institute of Technology and the United States Geological Survey.
34
The Southern California Earthquake Data Center (https://doi.org/10.7909/C3WD3xH1) is the archive of the Southern California Seismic Network.
35
A. Tarantola, Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation (SIAM, 2005).
36
S. Wiemer, M. Wyss, Minimum magnitude of completeness in earthquake catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 90, 859–869 (2000).
37
A. Mignan, J. Woessner, “Estimating the magnitude of completeness for earthquake catalogs,” Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis (2012); https://doi.org/10.5078/corssa-00180805.
38
B. Bender, Maximum likelihood estimation of b values for magnitude grouped data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73, 831–851 (1983).
39
E. Hauksson, Crustal structure and seismicity distribution adjacent to the Pacific and North America plate boundary in southern California. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 13875–13903 (2000).
40
A. Y. Ng, M. I. Jordan, Y. Weiss, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (MIT Press, 2001), pp. 849–856.
41
S. Toda, R. S. Stein, V. Sevilgen, J. Lin, Coulomb 3.3 Graphic-rich deformation and stress-change software for earthquake, tectonic, and volcano research and teaching–user guide: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011–1060 (2011); https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1060/.
42
M. Huang, E. J. Fielding, H. Dickinson, J. Sun, J. A. Gonzalez-Ortega, A. M. Freed, R. Bürgmann, Fault geometry inversion and slip distribution of the 2010 Mw 7.2 El Mayor‐Cucapah earthquake from geodetic data. J. Geophys. Res. 122, 607–621 (2017).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 364Issue 644224 May 2019
Pages: 767 - 771

History

Received: 16 January 2019
Accepted: 9 April 2019
18 April 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Geophysics Group, Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

Notes

*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Funding Information

http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001National Science Foundation: EAR-1550704
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001National Science Foundation: EAR-1818582
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000203U.S. Geological Survey: G18AP00028
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008902Los Alamos National Laboratory:

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Information & Authors
Published In
issue cover image
Science
Volume 364|Issue 6442
24 May 2019
Article Versions
You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Submission history
Received:16 January 2019
Accepted:9 April 2019
Published in print:24 May 2019
Metrics & Citations
Article Usage
Altmetrics
Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. The Proliferation of Induced Seismicity in the Permian Basin, Texas, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126, 6, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB021921
    Crossref
  2. SciANN: A Keras/TensorFlow wrapper for scientific computations and physics-informed deep learning using artificial neural networks, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 373, (113552), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113552
    Crossref
  3. Ιdentification of spatiotemporal seismicity clusters in central Ionian Islands (Greece), Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 312, (106675), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2021.106675
    Crossref
  4. Foreshocks of the 2018 ML 4.0 Shimian Earthquake in the Anninghe Fault and Its Implications for Earthquake Nucleation, Seismological Research Letters, 92, 3, (1937-1949), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200332
    Crossref
  5. Rare Occurrences of Non‐cascading Foreshock Activity in Southern California, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, 7, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091757
    Crossref
  6. Stress State Dynamics in Southern California from Geomechanical Monitoring Data before the М = 7.1 Earthquake of July 6, 2019, Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 57, 1, (1-19), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1134/S106935132101002X
    Crossref
  7. Local-Distance Seismic Event Relocation and Relative Magnitude Estimation, Applications to Mining Related Seismicity in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 111, 3, (1347-1364), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200369
    Crossref
  8. Markovian Arrival Processes for Earthquake Clustering Analysis, Statistical Methods and Modeling of Seismogenesis, (241-270), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119825050
    Crossref
  9. Heterogeneity of Aftershock Productivity Along the Mainshock Ruptures and Its Advantage in Improving Short‐Term Aftershock Forecast, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126, 4, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020494
    Crossref
  10. The RAMONES Service for Rapid Assessment of Seismic Moment and Radiated Energy in Central Italy: Concepts, Capabilities, and Future Perspectives, Seismological Research Letters, 92, 3, (1759-1772), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200348
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...
Share
Share article link

Share on social media
Get Access
Log in to view the full text

AAAS Log in

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions, as well as limited access for those who register for access.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View Options
Tables
References

(0)eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.