Advertisement

Attention changes local brain activity

There is a well-known correlation between arousal and neuronal activity in the brain. However, it is unclear how these general effects are reflected on a local scale. Engel et al. recorded from higher visual areas in behaving monkeys and discovered a new principle of cortical state fluctuations. A special type of electrodes revealed that the state changes affected neuronal excitability across all layers of the neocortex. When the animals attended to a stimulus, the vigorous spiking states became longer and the faint spiking states became shorter. These states correlated with fluctuations in the local field potential. A sophisticated computational model of the state changes fitted a two-state model of neuronal responsiveness.
Science, this issue p. 1140

Abstract

Neocortical activity is permeated with endogenously generated fluctuations, but how these dynamics affect goal-directed behavior remains a mystery. We found that ensemble neural activity in primate visual cortex spontaneously fluctuated between phases of vigorous (On) and faint (Off) spiking synchronously across cortical layers. These On-Off dynamics, reflecting global changes in cortical state, were also modulated at a local scale during selective attention. Moreover, the momentary phase of local ensemble activity predicted behavioral performance. Our results show that cortical state is controlled locally within a cortical map according to cognitive demands and reveal the impact of these local changes in cortical state on goal-directed behavior.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S13
Table S1
References (4058)

Resources

File (engel-sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Harris K. D. and Thiele A., Cortical state and attention. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 509–523 (2011).
2
Lee S.-H. and Dan Y., Neuromodulation of brain states. Neuron 76, 209–222 (2012).
3
Steriade M., McCormick D. A., and Sejnowski T. J., Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. Science 262, 679–685 (1993).
4
Steriade M., Timofeev I., and Grenier F., Natural waking and sleep states: A view from inside neocortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 85, 1969–1985 (2001).
5
Haider B., Duque A., Hasenstaub A. R., Yu Y., and McCormick D. A., Enhancement of visual responsiveness by spontaneous local network activity in vivo. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 4186–4202 (2007).
6
Hasenstaub A., Sachdev R. N. S., and McCormick D. A., State changes rapidly modulate cortical neuronal responsiveness. J. Neurosci. 27, 9607–9622 (2007).
7
Renart A., de la Rocha J., Bartho P., Hollender L., Parga N., Reyes A., and Harris K. D., The asynchronous state in cortical circuits. Science 327, 587–590 (2010).
8
Crochet S. and Petersen C. C. H., Correlating whisker behavior with membrane potential in barrel cortex of awake mice. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 608–610 (2006).
9
Poulet J. F. A. and Petersen C. C. H., Internal brain state regulates membrane potential synchrony in barrel cortex of behaving mice. Nature 454, 881–885 (2008).
10
Niell C. M. and Stryker M. P., Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in mouse visual cortex. Neuron 65, 472–479 (2010).
11
Okun M., Naim A., and Lampl I., The subthreshold relation between cortical local field potential and neuronal firing unveiled by intracellular recordings in awake rats. J. Neurosci. 30, 4440–4448 (2010).
12
Luczak A., Bartho P., and Harris K. D., Gating of sensory input by spontaneous cortical activity. J. Neurosci. 33, 1684–1695 (2013).
13
Tan A. Y. Y., Chen Y., Scholl B., Seidemann E., and Priebe N. J., Sensory stimulation shifts visual cortex from synchronous to asynchronous states. Nature 509, 226–229 (2014).
14
Steinmetz N. A. and Moore T., Eye movement preparation modulates neuronal responses in area V4 when dissociated from attentional demands. Neuron 83, 496–506 (2014).
15
Seidemann E., Meilijson I., Abeles M., Bergman H., and Vaadia E., Simultaneously recorded single units in the frontal cortex go through sequences of discrete and stable states in monkeys performing a delayed localization task. J. Neurosci. 16, 752–768 (1996).
16
Rainer G. and Miller E. K., Neural ensemble states in prefrontal cortex identified using a hidden Markov model with a modified EM algorithm. Neurocomputing 32-33, 961–966 (2000).
17
Vinck M., Batista-Brito R., Knoblich U., and Cardin J. A., Arousal and locomotion make distinct contributions to cortical activity patterns and visual encoding. Neuron 86, 740–754 (2015).
18
Reimer J., Froudarakis E., Cadwell C. R., Yatsenko D., Denfield G. H., and Tolias A. S., Pupil fluctuations track fast switching of cortical states during quiet wakefulness. Neuron 84, 355–362 (2014).
19
Moran J. and Desimone R., Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 229, 782–784 (1985).
20
Treue S. and Maunsell J. H., Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST. Nature 382, 539–541 (1996).
21
Fries P., Reynolds J. H., Rorie A. E., and Desimone R., Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention. Science 291, 1560–1563 (2001).
22
Renart A. and Machens C. K., Variability in neural activity and behavior. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 25, 211–220 (2014).
23
Cohen M. R. and Kohn A., Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 811–819 (2011).
24
Cohen M. R. and Newsome W. T., Context-dependent changes in functional circuitry in visual area MT. Neuron 60, 162–173 (2008).
25
Gu Y., Liu S., Fetsch C. R., Yang Y., Fok S., Sunkara A., DeAngelis G. C., and Angelaki D. E., Perceptual learning reduces interneuronal correlations in macaque visual cortex. Neuron 71, 750–761 (2011).
26
Ecker A. S., Berens P., Cotton R. J., Subramaniyan M., Denfield G. H., Cadwell C. R., Smirnakis S. M., Bethge M., and Tolias A. S., State dependence of noise correlations in macaque primary visual cortex. Neuron 82, 235–248 (2014).
27
Mitchell J. F., Sundberg K. A., and Reynolds J. H., Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque area V4. Neuron 63, 879–888 (2009).
28
Cohen M. R. and Maunsell J. H. R., Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1594–1600 (2009).
29
Ruff D. A. and Cohen M. R., Attention can either increase or decrease spike count correlations in visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1591–1597 (2014).
30
Ruff D. A. and Cohen M. R., Attention increases spike count correlations between visual cortical areas. J. Neurosci. 36, 7523–7534 (2016).
31
Goris R. L. T., Movshon J. A., and Simoncelli E. P., Partitioning neuronal variability. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 858–865 (2014).
32
Rabinowitz N. C., Goris R. L., Cohen M., and Simoncelli E. P., Attention stabilizes the shared gain of V4 populations. eLife 4, e08998 (2015).
33
Cohen M. R. and Maunsell J. H. R., A neuronal population measure of attention predicts behavioral performance on individual trials. J. Neurosci. 30, 15241–15253 (2010).
34
Aston-Jones G. and Cohen J. D., An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 403–450 (2005).
35
Robbins T. W. and Arnsten A. F. T., The neuropsychopharmacology of fronto-executive function: Monoaminergic modulation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 267–287 (2009).
36
Herrero J. L., Roberts M. J., Delicato L. S., Gieselmann M. A., Dayan P., and Thiele A., Acetylcholine contributes through muscarinic receptors to attentional modulation in V1. Nature 454, 1110–1114 (2008).
37
Noudoost B. and Moore T., Control of visual cortical signals by prefrontal dopamine. Nature 474, 372–375 (2011).
38
Zagha E., Casale A. E., Sachdev R. N. S., McGinley M. J., and McCormick D. A., Motor cortex feedback influences sensory processing by modulating network state. Neuron 79, 567–578 (2013).
39
Gregoriou G. G., Gotts S. J., Zhou H., and Desimone R., High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention. Science 324, 1207–1210 (2009).
40
Armstrong K. M., Chang M. H., and Moore T., Selection and maintenance of spatial information by frontal eye field neurons. J. Neurosci. 29, 15621–15629 (2009).
41
Armstrong K. M., Fitzgerald J. K., and Moore T., Changes in visual receptive fields with microstimulation of frontal cortex. Neuron 50, 791–798 (2006).
42
Kalwani R. M., Bloy L., Elliott M. A., and Gold J. I., A method for localizing microelectrode trajectories in the macaque brain using MRI. J. Neurosci. Methods 176, 104–111 (2009).
43
Hill D. N., Mehta S. B., and Kleinfeld D., Quality metrics to accompany spike sorting of extracellular signals. J. Neurosci. 31, 8699–8705 (2011).
44
Amarasingham A., Harrison M. T., Hatsopoulos N. G., and Geman S., Conditional modeling and the jitter method of spike resampling. J. Neurophysiol. 107, 517–531 (2012).
45
Smith M. A. and Kohn A., Spatial and temporal scales of neuronal correlation in primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 28, 12591–12603 (2008).
46
Steinmetz N. A. and Moore T., Changes in the response rate and response variability of area V4 neurons during the preparation of saccadic eye movements. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 1171–1178 (2010).
47
C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, 2006).
48
Kemere C., Santhanam G., Yu B. M., Afshar A., Ryu S. I., Meng T. H., and Shenoy K. V., Detecting neural-state transitions using hidden Markov models for motor cortical prostheses. J. Neurophysiol. 100, 2441–2452 (2008).
49
Womelsdorf T., Fries P., Mitra P. P., and Desimone R., Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection. Nature 439, 733–736 (2006).
50
Nicholson C. and Freeman J. A., Theory of current source-density analysis and determination of conductivity tensor for anuran cerebellum. J. Neurophysiol. 38, 356–368 (1975).
51
Vaknin G., DiScenna P. G., and Teyler T. J., A method for calculating current source density (CSD) analysis without resorting to recording sites outside the sampling volume. J. Neurosci. Methods 24, 131–135 (1988).
52
Jarvis M. R. and Mitra P. P., Sampling properties of the spectrum and coherency of sequences of action potentials. Neural Comput. 13, 717–749 (2001).
53
Reimann M. W., Anastassiou C. A., Perin R., Hill S. L., Markram H., and Koch C., A biophysically detailed model of neocortical local field potentials predicts the critical role of active membrane currents. Neuron 79, 375–390 (2013).
54
Okun M., Steinmetz N. A., Cossell L., Iacaruso M. F., Ko H., Barthó P., Moore T., Hofer S. B., Mrsic-Flogel T. D., Carandini M., and Harris K. D., Diverse coupling of neurons to populations in sensory cortex. Nature 521, 511–515 (2015).
55
Yu B. M., Cunningham J. P., Santhanam G., Ryu S. I., Shenoy K. V., and Sahani M., Gaussian-process factor analysis for low-dimensional single-trial analysis of neural population activity. J. Neurophysiol. 102, 614–635 (2009).
56
Leopold D. A. and Logothetis N. K., Microsaccades differentially modulate neural activity in the striate and extrastriate visual cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 123, 341–345 (1998).
57
Bair W. and O’Keefe L. P., The influence of fixational eye movements on the response of neurons in area MT of the macaque. Vis. Neurosci. 15, 779–786 (1998).
58
Churchland M. M., Yu B. M., Cunningham J. P., Sugrue L. P., Cohen M. R., Corrado G. S., Newsome W. T., Clark A. M., Hosseini P., Scott B. B., Bradley D. C., Smith M. A., Kohn A., Movshon J. A., Armstrong K. M., Moore T., Chang S. W., Snyder L. H., Lisberger S. G., Priebe N. J., Finn I. M., Ferster D., Ryu S. I., Santhanam G., Sahani M., and Shenoy K. V., Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: A widespread cortical phenomenon. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 369–378 (2010).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 354Issue 63162 December 2016
Pages: 1140 - 1144

History

Received: 16 May 2016
Accepted: 31 October 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tatiana A. Engel*, [email protected]
Departments of Bioengineering and Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nicholas A. Steinmetz*
Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Marc A. Gieselmann
Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Alexander Thiele
Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Tirin Moore
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kwabena Boahen
Departments of Bioengineering and Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Notes

*
These authors contributed equally to this work.
†Corresponding author Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Information & Authors
Published In
issue cover image
Science
Volume 354|Issue 6316
2 December 2016
Submission history
Received:16 May 2016
Accepted:31 October 2016
Published in print:2 December 2016
Metrics & Citations
Article Usage
Altmetrics
Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Spontaneous behaviors drive multidimensional, brainwide activity, Science, 364, 6437, (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aav7893
    Abstract
  2. Amygdala ensembles encode behavioral states, Science, 364, 6437, (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aav8736
    Abstract
Loading...
Share
Share article link

Share on social media
Get Access
Log in to view the full text

AAAS Log in

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions, as well as limited access for those who register for access.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View Options
Tables
References

(0)eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.