Advertisement

Joy or Pain?

Face recognition and processing are so completely central to human social interactions that these functions are supported by specialized regions in the brain. One of the fundamental aspects being processed is emotion, particularly whether the emotion being expressed is positive or negative. Nevertheless, neuroimaging studies have documented that perceiving opposite emotions often activates the same or overlapping regions. Aviezer et al. (p. 1225) report that the recognition of positive versus negative emotions actually relies on information communicated by the body—the extent to which perceivers identified joy versus grief in composite figures was driven by whether the body came from a joyous (versus grievous) image rather than the face.

Abstract

The distinction between positive and negative emotions is fundamental in emotion models. Intriguingly, neurobiological work suggests shared mechanisms across positive and negative emotions. We tested whether similar overlap occurs in real-life facial expressions. During peak intensities of emotion, positive and negative situations were successfully discriminated from isolated bodies but not faces. Nevertheless, viewers perceived illusory positivity or negativity in the nondiagnostic faces when seen with bodies. To reveal the underlying mechanisms, we created compounds of intense negative faces combined with positive bodies, and vice versa. Perceived affect and mimicry of the faces shifted systematically as a function of their contextual body emotion. These findings challenge standard models of emotion expression and highlight the role of the body in expressing and perceiving emotions.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Fig. S1

Resources

File (aviezer.sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Ekman P., Facial expression and emotion. Am. Psychol. 48, 384 (1993).
2
Izard C. E., Innate and universal facial expressions: Evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research. Psychol. Bull. 115, 288 (1994).
3
Carroll J. M., Russell J. A., Do facial expressions signal specific emotions? Judging emotion from the face in context. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70, 205 (1996).
4
Elfenbein H. A., Ambady N., On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 128, 203 (2002).
5
Susskind J. M., et al., Expressing fear enhances sensory acquisition. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 843 (2008).
6
Smith M. L., Cottrell G. W., Gosselin F., Schyns P. G., Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychol. Sci. 16, 184 (2005).
7
Young A. W., et al., Facial expression megamix: Tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition. Cognition 63, 271 (1997).
8
Hess U., Blairy S., Kleck R. E., The intensity of emotional facial expressions and decoding accuracy. J. Nonverbal Behav. 21, 241 (1997).
9
Gao X. Q., Maurer D., Influence of intensity on children’s sensitivity to happy, sad, and fearful facial expressions. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 102, 503 (2009).
10
Calder A. J., et al., Caricaturing facial expressions. Cognition 76, 105 (2000).
11
Matsumoto D., Willingham B., The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat: Spontaneous expressions of medal winners of the 2004 Athens Olympic Games. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91, 568 (2006).
12
Hughes S. M., Nicholson S. E., Sex differences in the assessment of pain versus sexual pleasure facial expressions. J. Soc. Evol. Cult. Psychol. 2, 289 (2008).
13
Zubieta J. K., et al., Placebo effects mediated by endogenous opioid activity on μ-opioid receptors. J. Neurosci. 25, 7754 (2005).
14
Leknes S., Tracey I., A common neurobiology for pain and pleasure. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 314 (2008).
15
Said C. P., Baron S. G., Todorov A., Nonlinear amygdala response to face trustworthiness: Contributions of high and low spatial frequency information. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 519 (2009).
16
Adolphs R., Tranel D., Damasio H., Damasio A., Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature 372, 669 (1994).
17
Canli T., Sivers H., Whitfield S. L., Gotlib I. H., Gabrieli J. D. E., Amygdala response to happy faces as a function of extraversion. Science 296, 2191 (2002).
18
Hamann S. B., Ely T. D., Hoffman J. M., Kilts C. D., Ecstasy and agony: Activation of the human amygdala in positive and negative emotion. Psychol. Sci. 13, 135 (2002).
19
Seymour B., Daw N., Dayan P., Singer T., Dolan R., Differential encoding of losses and gains in the human striatum. J. Neurosci. 27, 4826 (2007).
20
Tamir M., Mitchell C., Gross J. J., Hedonic and instrumental motives in anger regulation. Psychol. Sci. 19, 324 (2008).
21
Higgins E. T., Beyond pleasure and pain. Am. Psychol. 52, 1280 (1997).
22
Solomon R. L., Corbit J. D., An opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychol. Rev. 81, 119 (1974).
23
Tracy J. L., Matsumoto D., The spontaneous expression of pride and shame: Evidence for biologically innate nonverbal displays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 11655 (2008).
24
Aviezer H., Trope Y., Todorov A., Holistic person processing: Faces with bodies tell the whole story. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 103, 20 (2012).
25
Information on materials and methods for all experiments is available on Science Online.
26
Halberstadt J., Winkielman P., Niedenthal P. M., Dalle N., Emotional conception: How embodied emotion concepts guide perception and facial action. Psychol. Sci. 20, 1254 (2009).
27
Niedenthal P. M., Embodying emotion. Science 316, 1002 (2007).
28
Nisbett R. E., Wilson T. D., Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol. Rev. 84, 231 (1977).
29
Schwarz N., Clore G. L., Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45, 513 (1983).
30
H. Aviezer et al., Angry, disgusted, or afraid? Studies on the malleability of emotion perception. Psychol. Sci. 19, 724 (2008).
31
Barrett L. F., Kensinger E. A., Context is routinely encoded during emotion perception. Psychol. Sci. 21, 595 (2010).
32
Barrett L. F., Lindquist K. A., Gendron M., Language as context for the perception of emotion. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 327 (2007).
33
Trope Y., Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychol. Rev. 93, 239 (1986).
34
Meeren H. K. M., van Heijnsbergen C. C. R. J., de Gelder B., Rapid perceptual integration of facial expression and emotional body language. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 16518 (2005).
35
J. M. Fernández-Dols, M. A. Ruiz-Belda, in The Psychology of Facial Expression, J. A. Russell, J. M. Fernandez-Dols, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1997), pp. 255–274.
36
Fernández-Dols J. M., Carrera P., Crivelli C., Facial behavior while experiencing sexual excitement. J. Nonverbal Behav. 35, 63 (2011).
37
Motley M. T., Camden C. T., Facial expression of emotion: A comparison of posed expressions versus spontaneous expressions in an interpersonal communication setting. West. J. Commun. 52, 1 (1988).
38
Messinger D., Fogel A., Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 35, 328 (2007).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 338Issue 611130 November 2012
Pages: 1225 - 1229

History

Received: 4 May 2012
Accepted: 15 October 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hillel Aviezer* [email protected]
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Present address: Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yaacov Trope
Department of Psychology, New York University, NY 10003, USA.
Alexander Todorov
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Notes

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Information & Authors
Published In
issue cover image
Science
Volume 338|Issue 6111
30 November 2012
Submission history
Received:4 May 2012
Accepted:15 October 2012
Published in print:30 November 2012
Metrics & Citations
Article usage
Altmetrics
Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Share
Share article link

Share on social media
Get Access
Log in to view the full text

AAAS Log in

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions, as well as limited access for those who register for access.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View Options
Tables
References

(0)eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.