Skip to main content
Advertisement
Main content starts here

Give It Time

Experimental ecological studies in recent years have provided a great deal of insight into how species diversify and influence ecosystem properties, but in most cases the experiments have been relatively brief (up to ∼5 years). Reich et al. (p. 589; see the Perspective by Cardinale) performed two 13- and 15-year grassland experiments and found that the effects of plant species richness on community-level processes like biomass production tend to be saturating at early stages but that those impacts grow stronger and more linear as experiments run longer. Stronger influences through time were largely driven by increasing amounts of “complementarity” among species, and these trends were correlated with greater expression of functional diversity in multispecies assemblages. Thus, the effects of diversity grow stronger through time as species gain more and more opportunity to vary in their use of the limiting biological resources in their environment, which emphasizes the functional importance of maintaining diversity in ecosystems.

Abstract

Plant diversity generally promotes biomass production, but how the shape of the response curve changes with time remains unclear. This is a critical knowledge gap because the shape of this relationship indicates the extent to which loss of the first few species will influence biomass production. Using two long-term (≥13 years) biodiversity experiments, we show that the effects of diversity on biomass productivity increased and became less saturating over time. Our analyses suggest that effects of diversity-dependent ecosystem feedbacks and interspecific complementarity accumulate over time, causing high-diversity species combinations that appeared functionally redundant during early years to become more functionally unique through time. Consequently, simplification of diverse ecosystems will likely have greater negative impacts on ecosystem functioning than has been suggested by short-term experiments.

Register and access this article for free

As a service to the community, this article is available for free.

Access the full article

View all access options to continue reading this article.

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S9
Tables S1 to S3
References (2940)

Resources

File (reich-som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Cardinale B. J., et al., The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am. J. Bot. 98, 572 (2011).
2
Zavaleta E. S., Pasari J. R., Hulvey K. B., Tilman G. D., Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1443 (2010).
3
Balvanera P., et al., Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1146 (2006).
4
Isbell F., et al., High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477, 199 (2011).
5
Hector A., Bagchi R., Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 448, 188 (2007).
6
Tilman D., et al., Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294, 843 (2001).
7
Schnitzer S. A., et al., Soil microbes drive the classic plant diversity-productivity pattern. Ecology 92, 296 (2011).
8
Marquard E., et al., Plant species richness and functional composition drive overyielding in a six-year grassland experiment. Ecology 90, 3290 (2009).
9
Hector A., et al., Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands. Science 286, 1123 (1999).
10
Cardinale B. J., et al., Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 18123 (2007).
11
Hector A., et al., BUGS in the analysis of biodiversity experiments: Species richness and composition are of similar importance for grassland productivity. PLoS ONE 6, e17434 (2011).
12
Fargione J., et al., From selection to complementarity: Shifts in the causes of biodiversity-productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274, 871 (2007).
13
Fornara D. A., Tilman D., Ecological mechanisms associated with the positive diversity-productivity relationship in an N-limited grassland. Ecology 90, 408 (2009).
14
Isbell F. I., Polley H. W., Wilsey B. J., Species interaction mechanisms maintain grassland plant species diversity. Ecology 90, 1821 (2009).
15
van Ruijven J., Berendse F., Long-term persistence of a positive plant diversity-productivity relationship in the absence of legumes. Oikos 118, 101 (2009).
16
van Ruijven J., Berendse F., Diversity-productivity relationships: Initial effects, long-term patterns, and underlying mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 695 (2005).
17
Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials on Science Online.
18
Reich P. B., et al., Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2. Nature 440, 922 (2006).
19
Reich P. B., et al., Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature 410, 809 (2001).
20
Tilman D., et al., Biodiversity and ecosystem properties. Science 278, 1866 (1997).
21
Tilman D., Reich P. B., Knops J. M. H., Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441, 629 (2006).
22
Loreau M., Hector A., Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412, 72 (2001).
23
Hooper D. U., Vitousek P. M., Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol. Monogr. 68, 121 (1998).
24
Kahmen A., Renker C., Unsicker S. B., Buchmann N., Niche complementarity for nitrogen: An explanation for the biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relationship? Ecology 87, 1244 (2006).
25
Allan E., et al., More diverse plant communities have higher functioning over time due to turnover in complementary dominant species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 17034 (2011).
26
Petermann J. S., Fergus A. J. F., Turnbull L. A., Schmid B., Janzen-Connell effects are widespread and strong enough to maintain diversity in grasslands. Ecology 89, 2399 (2008).
27
Haddad N. M., Crutsinger G. M., Gross K., Haarstad J., Tilman D., Plant diversity and the stability of foodwebs. Ecol. Lett. 14, 42 (2011).
28
Wright I. J., et al., The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821 (2004).
29
Peterson D. W., Reich P. B., Fire frequency and tree canopy structure influence plant species diversity in a forest-grassland ecotone. Plant Ecol. 194, 5 (2008).
30
Tilman D., Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78, 81 (1997).
31
Reich P. B., Elevated CO2 reduces losses of plant diversity caused by nitrogen deposition. Science 326, 1399 (2009).
32
Jungers J., Trost J., Lehman C., Tilman D., Asp. Appl. Biol. 112, 147 (2011).
33
B. Schmid et al., in Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective, S. Naeem, D. E. Bunker, A. Hector, M. Loreau, C. Perrings, Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2009).
34
Schlapfer F., Schmid B., Seidl I., Expert estimates about effects of biodiversity on ecosystem processes and services. Oikos 84, 346 (1999).
35
Hedges L. V., Gurevitch J., Curtis P. S., The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80, 1150 (1999).
36
Petchey O. L., Gaston K. J., Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol. Lett. 5, 402 (2002).
37
Reich P. B., Walters M. B., Ellsworth D. S., From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 13730 (1997).
38
Flynn D. F. B., Mirotchnick N., Jain M., Palmer M. I., Naeem S., Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity—Ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology 92, 1573 (2011).
39
Botta-Dukát Z., Rao’s quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits. J. Veg. Sci. 16, 533 (2005).
40
O. L. Petchey, E. J. O'Gorman, D. F. B. Flynn, in Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, & Human Wellbeing, S. Naeem, D. E. Bunker, A. Hector, M. Loreau, C. Perrings, Eds. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2009), pp. 49–59.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Neither embedded figures nor equations with special characters can be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures and equations within eLetters in general. If a figure or equation is essential, please include within the text of the eLetter a link to the figure, equation, or full text with special characters at a public repository with versioning, such as Zenodo. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

ScienceAdviser

Get Science’s award-winning newsletter with the latest news, commentary, and research, free to your inbox daily.