Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces breast cancer metastasis through a TMEM-mediated mechanism
Closing the door to cancer cells
Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions, as well as limited access for those who register for access.
Purchase digital access to this article
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
No eLetters have been published for this article yet.
eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.
Comment on "The Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) setting provides an opportunity to study mechanisms of resistance to therapy but should not be portrayed as inducing clinical breast cancer metastasis"
The findings reported by Karaglannis et al. (1) demonstrate a potentially important advance in our understanding of how metastases occur in some tumor types. However, the data presented are far from sufficient to justify the conclusion that neoadjuvant chemotherapy causes metastases in breast cancer patients (2).
The mouse data demonstrate a mechanism whereby taxane-resistant cancer can escape and metastasize. Transgenic aggressive murine models were used and the responses obtained to paclitaxel were partial at best - a control group of mouse tumors highly responsive to taxanes that illuminated TMEM function in responsive tumors would be required to conclude that taxanes induce metastases in all tumors. Furthermore, the duration of treatment regimens used were not comparable to typical clinical neoadjuvant taxanes protocols.
Evidence that this mechanism is clinically active comes from only a limited number of cases (7 from one series and 5 from another), all of which had residual tumor following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Residual disease at time of surgery is a well established predictor of poor outcome (metastasis), which over multiple trials and meta-analyses has clearly been shown to be associated with an increased risk of metastatic disease. Cases where pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved were not evaluated in this manuscript, however, 13-50% of high-risk breast cancers achieve a pCR following taxane-based chemotherapy. Patients who achieve complete pathologic response have consistently better long-term outcomes and event-free recurrence (3).
A number of trials have demonstrated that taxanes improve distant metastasis disease free survival, especially in more aggressive tumor types (4, 5). Multiple large trials have also clearly established that order of therapy does not impact survival (6, 7), including NSABP B-27 where paclitaxel was given after doxorubicin either before or after primary surgery. NSABP B-28, a randomized trial of 3060 women, showed that paclitaxel, when added to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, decreased the chance of metastatic disease by 17%. NSABP B-27 showed that whether paxlitaxel is given before or after surgical resection, the chance of metastasis is the same. Many trials have shown that the order of therapy does not impact survival t, which has allowed the neoadjuvant setting to be a driver for drug development and improve surgical and radiation adjuvant options. The cornerstone of modern advances in NAC has been that patients who achieve complete pathologic response to chemotherapy have consistently better long-term outcomes and disease-free recurrence.This, in fact, is one of the primary reasons the neoadjuvant treatment has become an important driver for drug development while also improving surgical and radiation adjuvant treatment options (8-10).
Given that that this study evaluated only those with residual disease, a more appropriate and actionable conclusion is that the authors have delineated a potential mutable mechanism of resistance to chemotherapy. This finding becomes more significant with the existence of a class of drugs that targets this pathway. The TIE2 inhibitor, AMG 386, when added to standard therapy in the I-SPY2 trial, improved the chance of pCR in the most proliverative tumors (11). Indeed, this is an exciting avenue for further investigation and combinations that include agents that block the tumor microenvironment of metastases should be evaluated and are being investigated as potential agents for the I-SPY2 TRIAL.
However, provocative statements that imply that chemotherapy induces metastases are misleading and frightening to patients. Numerous headlines spawned by this manuscript led some patients to believe that NAC could increase their chance of death, thereby causing women to avoid treatments that are potentially curative and part of the standard of care. There are a number of important neoadjuvant clinical trials focused on developing more effective treatments; one recent combination in the I-SPY2 TRIAL tripled the chance of pCR. We certainly do not want to inappropriately discourage women from participating in trials that explore possible options to improve pCR and have led to numerous opportunities to change the standard of care. We are certain that the authors did not intend to send this message.
Signed,
Laura Esserman
Andres Forero
Hope Rugo
Anna Barker
Angie DeMichele
Jane Perlmutter
Christina Yau
Denise Wolf
Kathy Albain
Michael Alvarado
Doug Yee
References
1. G. S. Karagiannis, J. M. Pastoriza, Y. Wang, A. S. Harney, D. Entenberg, J. Pignatelli, V. P. Sharma, E. A. Xue, E. Cheng, T. M. D'Alfonso, J. G. Jones, J. Anampa, T. E. Rohan, J. A. Sparano, J. S. Condeelis, M. H. Oktay, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces breast cancer metastasis through a TMEM-mediated mechanism, Sci Transl Med 9, eaan0026 (2017).
2. A. DeMichele, D. Yee, L. Esserman, E. G. Phimister, Ed. Mechanisms of Resistance to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer, http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcibr1711545 377, 2287–2289 (2017).
3. S. S. Mougalian, M. Hernandez, X. Lei, S. Lynch, H. M. Kuerer, W. F. Symmans, R. L. Theriault, B. D. Fornage, L. Hsu, T. A. Buchholz, A. A. Sahin, K. K. Hunt, W. T. Yang, G. N. Hortobagyi, V. Valero, Ten-Year Outcomes of Patients With Breast Cancer With Cytologically Confirmed Axillary Lymph Node Metastases and Pathologic Complete Response After Primary Systemic Chemotherapy, JAMA Oncol 2, 508–516 (2016).
4. E. P. Mamounas, J. Bryant, B. Lembersky, L. Fehrenbacher, S. M. Sedlacek, B. Fisher, D. L. Wickerham, G. Yothers, A. Soran, N. Wolmark, Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-28, Journal of Clinical Oncology 23, 3686–3696 (2005).
5. J. L. Blum, P. J. Flynn, G. Yothers, L. Asmar, C. E. GeyerJr, S. A. Jacobs, N. J. Robert, J. O. Hopkins, J. A. O'Shaughnessy, C. T. Dang, H. L. Gómez, L. Fehrenbacher, S. J. Vukelja, A. P. Lyss, D. Paul, A. M. Brufsky, J.-H. Jeong, L. H. Colangelo, S. M. Swain, E. P. Mamounas, S. E. Jones, N. Wolmark, Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: The ABC Trials—USOR 06-090, NSABP B-46-I/USOR 07132, and NSABP B-49 (NRG Oncology), Journal of Clinical Oncology, JCO.2016.71.414 (2017).
6. D. Mauri, N. Pavlidis, J. P. A. Ioannidis, Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Systemic Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis, JNCI 97, 188–194 (2005).
7. P. Rastogi, S. J. Anderson, H. D. Bear, C. E. Geyer, M. S. Kahlenberg, A. Robidoux, R. G. Margolese, J. L. Hoehn, V. G. Vogel, S. R. Dakhil, D. Tamkus, K. M. King, E. R. Pajon, M. J. Wright, J. Robert, S. Paik, E. P. Mamounas, N. Wolmark, Preoperative Chemotherapy: Updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27, Journal of Clinical Oncology 26, 778–785 (2008).
8. J. W. Park, M. C. Liu, D. Yee, C. Yau, L. J. van t Veer, W. F. Symmans, M. Paoloni, J. Perlmutter, N. M. Hylton, M. Hogarth, A. DeMichele, M. B. Buxton, A. J. Chien, A. M. Wallace, J. C. Boughey, T. C. Haddad, S. Y. Chui, K. A. Kemmer, H. G. Kaplan, C. Isaacs, R. Nanda, D. Tripathy, K. S. Albain, K. K. Edmiston, A. D. Elias, D. W. Northfelt, L. Pusztai, S. L. Moulder, J. E. Lang, R. K. Viscusi, D. M. Euhus, B. B. Haley, Q. J. Khan, W. C. Wood, M. Melisko, R. Schwab, T. Helsten, J. Lyandres, S. E. Davis, G. L. Hirst, A. Sanil, L. J. Esserman, D. A. Berry, Adaptive Randomization of Neratinib in Early Breast Cancer, N Engl J Med 375, 11–22 (2016).
9. H. S. Rugo, O. I. Olopade, A. DeMichele, C. Yau, L. J. van t Veer, M. B. Buxton, M. Hogarth, N. M. Hylton, M. Paoloni, J. Perlmutter, W. F. Symmans, D. Yee, A. J. Chien, A. M. Wallace, H. G. Kaplan, J. C. Boughey, T. C. Haddad, K. S. Albain, M. C. Liu, C. Isaacs, Q. J. Khan, J. E. Lang, R. K. Viscusi, L. Pusztai, S. L. Moulder, S. Y. Chui, K. A. Kemmer, A. D. Elias, K. K. Edmiston, D. M. Euhus, B. B. Haley, R. Nanda, D. W. Northfelt, D. Tripathy, W. C. Wood, C. Ewing, R. Schwab, J. Lyandres, S. E. Davis, G. L. Hirst, A. Sanil, D. A. Berry, L. J. Esserman, Adaptive Randomization of Veliparib–Carboplatin Treatment in Breast Cancer, N Engl J Med 375, 23–34 (2016).
10. J. Baselga, I. Bradbury, H. Eidtmann, S. Di Cosimo, E. de Azambuja, C. Aura, H. Gómez, P. Dinh, K. Fauria, V. Van Dooren, G. Aktan, A. Goldhirsch, T.-W. Chang, Z. Horváth, M. Coccia-Portugal, J. Domont, L.-M. Tseng, G. Kunz, J. H. Sohn, V. Semiglazov, G. Lerzo, M. Palacova, V. Probachai, L. Pusztai, M. Untch, R. D. Gelber, M. Piccart-Gebhart, Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial, The Lancet 379, 633–640 (2012).
11. K. S. Albain, B. Leyland-Jones, F. Symmans, M. Paolini, L. J. van't Veer, A. DeMichele, M. Buxton, N. M. Hylton, D. Yee, J. Lyandres, C. Yau, A. Sanil, I-SPY2 Trial Investigators, D. Berry, L. J. Esserman, The evaluation of trebananib plus standard neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY2 Trial. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (2016).