Advertisement

Another look at p53-p73 interactions

The transcription factor p53 critically regulates cell survival or death in response to cellular stress. Mutations in p53 are common in cancer and alter its interactions with other proteins and, consequently, with cell fate–specific genes. Mutant p53 binds to and inhibits its family member p73, thereby promoting cell survival instead of cell death in response to cell stress. It was believed that this interaction with p73 was specific to mutant p53. However, Wolf et al. found that wild-type p53 can bind p73 to promote stress-induced cell death. Phosphorylation of wild-type p53 by the cell stress–responsive kinase JNK caused a conformational change that mirrored the regional structure of the mutant and enabled its binding to p73 but, unlike mutant p53, the wild-type protein could still bind to apoptotic gene targets. These findings refine our understanding of p53 interactions and, specifically, p53-p73 coordination in the cell stress response.

Abstract

The transcription factors p53 and p73 are critical to the induction of apoptotic cell death, particularly in response to cell stress that activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK). Mutations in the DNA-binding domain of p53, which are commonly seen in cancers, result in conformational changes that enable p53 to interact with and inhibit p73, thereby suppressing apoptosis. In contrast, wild-type p53 reportedly does not interact with p73. We found that JNK-mediated phosphorylation of Thr81 in the proline-rich domain (PRD) of p53 enabled wild-type p53, as well as mutant p53, to form a complex with p73. Structural algorithms predicted that phosphorylation of Thr81 exposes the DNA-binding domain in p53 to enable its binding to p73. The dimerization of wild-type p53 with p73 facilitated the expression of apoptotic target genes [such as those encoding p53–up-regulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) and Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX)] and, subsequently, the induction of apoptosis in response to JNK activation by cell stress in various cells. Thus, JNK phosphorylation of mutant and wild-type p53 promotes the formation of a p53/p73 complex that determines cell fate: apoptosis in the context of wild-type p53 or cell survival in the context of the mutant. These findings refine our current understanding of both the mechanistic links between p53 and p73 and the functional role for Thr81 phosphorylation.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

Summary

Fig. S1. Phosphorylation of Thr81 in cell lines with wild-type p53.
Fig. S2. U87 cell death.
Fig. S3. JNK activation or inhibition in HME, MDA157, and TMD231 cell lines.
Table S1. Manders’ coefficients for microscopy colocalization analysis.
Data file S1. Wild-type p53 structure [Protein Data Bank (PDB)].
Data file S2. p53 R248W structure (PDB).
Data file S3. p53 T81E structure (PDB).
Data file S4. p53 S46D structure (PDB).
Data file S5. p53 R248W/T81E structure (PDB).

Resources

File (aao4170_data_files_s1_to_s5.zip)
File (aao4170_sm.pdf)

REFERENCES AND NOTES

1
C. J. Di Como, C. Gaiddon, C. Prives, p73 function is inhibited by tumor-derived p53 mutants in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1438–1449 (1999).
2
C. Gaiddon, M. Lokshin, J. Ahn, T. Zhang, C. Prives, A subset of tumor-derived mutant forms of p53 down-regulate p63 and p73 through a direct interaction with the p53 core domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 1874–1887 (2001).
3
E. R. Flores, S. Sengupta, J. B. Miller, J. J. Newman, R. Bronson, D. Crowley, A. Yang, F. McKeon, T. Jacks, Tumor predisposition in mice mutant for p63 and p73: Evidence for broader tumor suppressor functions for the p53 family. Cancer Cell 7, 363–373 (2005).
4
T. S. Davison, C. Vagner, M. Kaghad, A. Ayed, D. Caput, C. H. Arrowsmith, p73 and p63 are homotetramers capable of weak heterotypic interactions with each other but not with p53. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 18709–18714 (1999).
5
A. C. Joerger, S. Rajagopalan, E. Natan, D. B. Veprintsev, C. V. Robinson, A. R. Fersht, Structural evolution of p53, p63, and p73: Implication for heterotetramer formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 17705–17710 (2009).
6
J. Zhu, J. Jiang, W. Zhou, K. Zhu, X. Chen, Differential regulation of cellular target genes by p53 devoid of the PXXP motifs with impaired apoptotic activity. Oncogene 18, 2149–2155 (1999).
7
J. Zhu, S. Zhang, J. Jiang, X. Chen, Definition of the p53 functional domains necessary for inducing apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 39927–39934 (2000).
8
E. M. Ruaro, L. Collavin, G. Del Sal, R. Haffner, M. Oren, A. J. Levine, C. Schneider, A proline-rich motif in p53 is required for transactivation-independent growth arrest as induced by Gas1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 4675–4680 (1997).
9
C. Venot, M. Maratrat, C. Dureuil, E. Conseiller, L. Bracco, L. Debussche, The requirement for the p53 proline-rich functional domain for mediation of apoptosis is correlated with specific PIG3 gene transactivation and with transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 17, 4668–4679 (1998).
10
J. Zhu, W. Zhou, J. Jiang, X. Chen, Identification of a novel p53 functional domain that is necessary for mediating apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13030–13036 (1998).
11
L. D. Mayo, Y. R. Seo, M. W. Jackson, M. L. Smith, J. Rivera Guzman, C. K. Korgaonkar, D. B. Donner, Phosphorylation of human p53 at serine 46 determines promoter selection and whether apoptosis is attenuated or amplified. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 25953–25959 (2005).
12
Y. Wang, K.-M. Debatin, H. Hug, HIPK2 overexpression leads to stabilization of p53 protein and increased p53 transcriptional activity by decreasing Mdm2 protein levels. BMC Mol. Biol. 2, 8 (2001).
13
G. D’Orazi, B. Cecchinelli, T. Bruno, I. Manni, Y. Higashimoto, S. Saito, M. Gostissa, S. Coen, A. Marchetti, G. Del Sal, G. Piaggio, M. Fanciulli, E. Appella, S. Soddu, Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2 phosphorylates p53 at Ser 46 and mediates apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 11–19 (2002).
14
T. G. Hofmann, A. Möller, H. Sirma, H. Zentgraf, Y. Taya, W. Dröge, H. Will, M. L. Schmitz, Regulation of p53 activity by its interaction with homeodomain-interacting protein kinase-2. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 1–10 (2002).
15
S. Y. Fuchs, V. Adler, M. R. Pincus, Z. Ronai, MEKK1/JNK signaling stabilizes and activates p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 10541–10546 (1998).
16
S. Saito, A. A. Goodarzi, Y. Higashimoto, Y. Noda, S. P. Lees-Miller, E. Appella, C. W. Anderson, ATM mediates phosphorylation at multiple p53 sites, including Ser46, in response to ionizing radiation. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 12491–12494 (2002).
17
D. V. Bulavin, S. Saito, M. C. Hollander, K. Sakaguchi, C. W. Anderson, E. Appella, A. J. Fornace, Phosphorylation of human p53 by p38 kinase coordinates N-terminal phosphorylation and apoptosis in response to UV radiation. EMBO J. 18, 6845–6854 (1999).
18
T. Buschmann, O. Potapova, A. Bar-Shira, V. N. Ivanov, S. Y. Fuchs, S. Henderson, V. A. Fried, T. Minamoto, D. Alarcon-Vargas, M. R. Pincus, W. A. Gaarde, N. J. Holbrook, Y. Shiloh, Z. Ronai, Jun NH2-terminal kinase phosphorylation of p53 on Thr-81 is important for p53 stabilization and transcriptional activities in response to stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 2743–2754 (2001).
19
M. Berger, N. Stahl, G. Del Sal, Y. Haupt, Mutations in proline 82 of p53 impair its activation by Pin1 and Chk2 in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 5380–5388 (2005).
20
K. K. Walker, A. J. Levine, Identification of a novel p53 functional domain that is necessary for efficient growth suppression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 15335–15340 (1996).
21
N. Baptiste, P. Friedlander, X. Chen, C. Prives, The proline-rich domain of p53 is required for cooperation with anti-neoplastic agents to promote apoptosis of tumor cells. Oncogene 21, 9–21 (2002).
22
A. Roy, A. Kucukural, Y. Zhang, I-TASSER: A unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 5, 725–738 (2010).
23
J. Yang, R. Yan, A. Roy, D. Xu, J. Poisson, Y. Zhang, The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods 12, 7–8 (2015).
24
Y. Zhang, I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 40 (2008).
25
L. D. Mayo, J. E. Dixon, D. L. Durden, N. K. Tonks, D. B. Donner, PTEN protects p53 from Mdm2 and sensitizes cancer cells to chemotherapy. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 5484–5489 (2002).
26
V. Stambolic, D. MacPherson, D. Sas, Y. Lin, B. Snow, Y. Jang, S. Benchimol, T. W. Mak, Regulation of PTEN transcription by p53. Mol. Cell 8, 317–325 (2001).
27
J. A. Eitel, K. Bijangi-Vishehsaraei, M. R. Saadatzadeh, M. P. Murphy, K. E. Pollok, L. D. Mayo, PTEN and p53 are required for hypoxia induced expression of maspin in glioblastoma cells. Cell Cycle 8, 896–901 (2009).
28
L. D. Mayo, D. B. Donner, A phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway promotes translocation of Mdm2 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 11598–11603 (2001).
29
A. G. Li, L. G. Piluso, X. Cai, G. Wei, W. R. Sellers, X. Liu, Mechanistic insights into maintenance of high p53 acetylation by PTEN. Mol. Cell 23, 575–587 (2006).
30
T. Maehama, J. E. Dixon, PTEN: A tumour suppressor that functions as a phospholipid phosphatase. Trends Cell Biol. 9, 125–128 (1999).
31
X. Wu, J. H. Bayle, D. Olson, A. J. Levine, The p53–mdm-2 autoregulatory feedback loop. Genes Dev. 7, 1126–1132 (1993).
32
J. A. Lehman, D. L. Waning, C. N. Batuello, R. Cipriano, M. P. Kadakia, L. D. Mayo, Induction of apoptotic genes by a p73-phosphatase and tensin homolog (p73-PTEN) protein complex in response to genotoxic stress. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 36631–36640 (2011).
33
E. R. Flores, K. Y. Tsai, D. Crowley, S. Sengupta, A. Yang, F. McKeon, T. Jacks, p63 and p73 are required for p53-dependent apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Nature 416, 560–564 (2002).
34
F. Talos, A. Nemajerova, E. R. Flores, O. Petrenko, U. M. Moll, p73 suppresses polyploidy and aneuploidy in the absence of functional p53. Mol. Cell 27, 647–659 (2007).
35
A. Di Cristofano, B. Pesce, C. Cordon-Cardo, P. P. Pandolfi, Pten is essential for embryonic development and tumour suppression. Nat. Genet. 19, 348–355 (1998).
36
A. Suzuki, J. L. de la Pompa, V. Stambolic, A. J. Elia, T. Sasaki, I. del Barco Barrantes, A. Ho, A. Wakeham, A. Itie, W. Khoo, M. Fukumoto, T. W. Mak, High cancer susceptibility and embryonic lethality associated with mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in mice. Curr. Biol. 8, 1169–1178 (1998).
37
R. J. Davis, Signal transduction by the c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 64, 1–12 (1999).
38
E. V. Jones, M. J. Dickman, A. J. Whitmarsh, Regulation of p73-mediated apoptosis by c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Biochem. J. 405, 617–623 (2007).
39
C. N. Batuello, P. M. Hauck, J. M. Gendron, J. A. Lehman, L. D. Mayo, Src phosphorylation converts Mdm2 from a ubiquitinating to a neddylating E3 ligase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 1749–1754 (2015).
40
S. Kehrloesser, C. Osterburg, M. Tuppi, B. Schäfer, K. H. Vousden, V. Dötsch, Intrinsic aggregation propensity of the p63 and p73 TI domains correlates with p53R175H interaction and suggests further significance of aggregation events in the p53 family. Cell Death Differ. 23, 1952–1960 (2016).
41
J. Gebel, L. M. Luh, D. Coutandin, C. Osterburg, F. Löhr, B. Schäfer, A.-S. Frombach, M. Sumyk, L. Buchner, T. Krojer, E. Salah, S. Mathea, P. Güntert, S. Knapp, V. Dötsch, Mechanism of TAp73 inhibition by ΔNp63 and structural basis of p63/p73 hetero-tetramerization. Cell Death Differ. 23, 1930–1940 (2016).
42
G. Chillemi, S. Kehrloesser, F. Bernassola, A. Desideri, V. Dötsch, A. J. Levine, G. Melino, Structural evolution and dynamics of the p53 proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 7, a028308 (2017).
43
S. McNicholas, E. Potterton, K. S. Wilson, M. E. M. Noble, Presenting your structures: The CCP4mg molecular-graphics software. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 386–394 (2011).
44
T. R. Brummelkamp, R. Bernards, R. Agami, A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells. Science 296, 550–553 (2002).
45
J. T. Patton, L. D. Mayo, A. D. Singhi, A. V. Gudkov, G. R. Stark, M. W. Jackson, Levels of HdmX expression dictate the sensitivity of normal and transformed cells to Nutlin-3. Cancer Res. 66, 3169–3176 (2006).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science Signaling
Volume 11 | Issue 524
April 2018

Submission history

Received: 18 July 2017
Accepted: 15 March 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank members of the Mayo laboratory for critical reading of the manuscript, D. Trono for the expression vector, and P. Wubbolding and P.M. Hauck for production and purification of recombinant proteins. Funding: This work was supported in part through funds provided by the Jeff Gordon Children’s Foundation, the Riley Children’s Foundation, and NIH CA172256 to L.D.M. Author contributions: Experiments were performed and analyzed by E.R.W. and C.P.M. (contributed equally) and K.E.B. and A.M.K. (contributed equally). L.D.M. conducted some experiments and wrote the article. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper or the Supplementary Materials.

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Kristin E. Bredhold
Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

Funding Information

Riley Children’s Foundation
Jeff Gordon Children’s Foundation

Notes

*
These authors contributed equally to this work.
†Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. LRRC8A influences the growth of gastric cancer cells via the p53 signaling pathway, Gastric Cancer, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-021-01187-4
    Crossref
  2. Mdm2-mediated neddylation of pVHL blocks the induction of antiangiogenic factors, Oncogene, 39, 29, (5228-5239), (2020).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-1359-4
    Crossref
  3. Eva‐1 homolog A promotes papillary thyroid cancer progression and epithelial‐mesenchymal transition via the Hippo signalling pathway, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 24, 22, (13070-13080), (2020).https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15909
    Crossref
  4. Understanding MAPK Signaling Pathways in Apoptosis, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, 7, (2346), (2020).https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072346
    Crossref
  5. The JNK Signaling Pathway in Inflammatory Skin Disorders and Cancer, Cells, 9, 4, (857), (2020).https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9040857
    Crossref
  6. p53 mutant-type in human prostate cancer cells determines the sensitivity to phenethyl isothiocyanate induced growth inhibition, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, 38, 1, (2019).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-019-1267-z
    Crossref
  7. The role of TP53 in acute myeloid leukemia: Challenges and opportunities, Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 58, 12, (875-888), (2019).https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.22796
    Crossref
  8. p53 modifications: exquisite decorations of the powerful guardian, Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, 11, 7, (564-577), (2019).https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjz060
    Crossref
  9. The Diverse Functions of Mutant 53, Its Family Members and Isoforms in Cancer, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20, 24, (6188), (2019).https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20246188
    Crossref
  10. Synergetic and Antagonistic Molecular Effects Mediated by the Feedback Loop of p53 and JNK between Saikosaponin D and SP600125 on Lung Cancer A549 Cells, Molecular Pharmaceutics, 15, 11, (4974-4984), (2018).https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00595
    Crossref
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media