Advertisement

Abstract

Elucidating the neural and psychological mechanisms underlying people’s interpretation of robot behavior can inform the design of interactive autonomous systems, such as social robots and automated vehicles.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

REFERENCES

1
F. Bossi, C. Willemse, J. Cavazza, S. Marchesi, V. Murino, A. Wykowska, The human brain reveals resting state activity patterns that are predictive of biases in attitudes towards robots. Sci. Robot. 5, eabb6652 (2020).
2
S. Thellman, A. Silvervarg, T. Ziemke, Folk-psychological interpretation of human vs. humanoid robot behavior: Exploring the intentional stance toward robots. Front. Psychol. 8, 1962 (2017).
3
V. Petrovych, S. Thellman, T. Ziemke, Human interpretation of goal-directed autonomous car behavior, in Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Cognitive Science Society, 2018), pp. 2235–2240.
4
D. C. Dennett, The Intentional Stance (MIT Press, 1987).
5
H. L. Dreyfus, What Computers Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason (Harper and Row, 1972).
6
J. R. Searle, Minds, brains and programs. Behav. Brain Sci. 3, 417–457 (1980).
7
B. C. Smith, The Promise of Artificial Intelligence: Reckoning and Judgment (MIT Press, 2019).
8
A. Marshall, A. Davies, Uber’s self-driving car didn’t know pedestrians could jaywalk, WIRED, 11 May 2019; www.wired.com/story/ubers-self-driving-car-didnt-know-pedestrians-could-jaywalk/.
9
L. Damiano, P. Dumouchel, Anthropomorphism in human–robot co-evolution. Front. Psychol. 9, 468 (2018).
10
E. G. Urquiza-Haas, K. Kotrscha, The mind behind anthropomorphic thinking: Attribution of mental states to other species. Anim. Behav. 109, 167–176 (2015).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science Robotics
Volume 5 | Issue 46
September 2020

Submission history

Received: 3 September 2020
Accepted: 8 September 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Cognition & Interaction Lab, Human-Centered Systems Division, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Check-in at the Robo-desk: Effects of automated social presence on social cognition and service implications, Tourism Management, 85, (104309), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104309
    Crossref
  2. A Pragmatic Approach to the Intentional Stance Semantic, Empirical and Ethical Considerations for the Design of Artificial Agents, Minds and Machines, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09567-6
    Crossref
  3. Do You See what I See? Tracking the Perceptual Beliefs of Robots, iScience, 23, 10, (101625), (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101625
    Crossref
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media