Register and access this article for free
As a service to the community, this article is available for free.
Harnessing the potential of nature-based solutions for mitigating and adapting to climate change
Abstract
Although many governments, financial institutions, and corporations are embracing nature-based solutions as part of their sustainability and net-zero carbon strategies, some nations, Indigenous peoples, local community groups, and grassroots organizations have rejected this term. This pushback is fueled by (i) critical uncertainties about when, where, how, and for whom nature-based solutions are effective and (ii) controversies surrounding their misuse in greenwashing, violations of human rights, and threats to biodiversity. To clarify how the scientific community can help address these issues, I provide an overview of recent research on the benefits and limits of nature-based solutions, including how they compare with technological approaches, and highlight critical areas for future research.
Access the full article
View all access options to continue reading this article.
References and Notes
1
E. Cohen-Shacham, A. Andrade, J. Dalton, N. Dudley, M. Jones, C. Kumar, S. Maginnis, S. Maynard, C. R. Nelson, F. G. Renaud, R. Welling, G. Walters, Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling Nature-based Solutions. Environ. Sci. Policy 98, 20–29 (2019).
2
N. Seddon, A. Smith, P. Smith, I. Key, A. Chausson, C. Girardin, J. House, S. Srivastava, B. Turner, Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 1518–1546 (2021).
3
N. Seddon, A. Chausson, P. Berry, C. A. J. Girardin, A. Smith, B. Turner, Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190120 (2020).
4
S. Díaz, U. Pascual, M. Stenseke, B. Martín-López, R. T. Watson, Z. Molnár, R. Hill, K. M. A. Chan, I. A. Baste, K. A. Brauman, S. Polasky, A. Church, M. Lonsdale, A. Larigauderie, P. W. Leadley, A. P. E. van Oudenhoven, F. van der Plaat, M. Schröter, S. Lavorel, Y. Aumeeruddy-Thomas, E. Bukvareva, K. Davies, S. Demissew, G. Erpul, P. Failler, C. A. Guerra, C. L. Hewitt, H. Keune, S. Lindley, Y. Shirayama, Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).
5
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Glasgow Climate Pact. Decision text from CoP26 (2021); https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cp2021_12_add1E.pdf.
6
M. S. Melanidis, S. Hagerman, Competing narratives of nature-based solutions: Leveraging the power of nature or dangerous distraction? Environ. Sci. Policy 132, 273–281 (2022).
7
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P. R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
8
C. J. Nolan, C. B. Field, K. J. Mach, Constraints and enablers for increasing carbon storage in the terrestrial biosphere. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 436–446 (2021).
9
J. Howard, A. Sutton-Grier, D. Herr, J. Kleypas, E. Landis, E. Mcleod, E. Pidgeon, S. Simpson, Clarifying the role of coastal and marine systems in climate mitigation. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 42–50 (2017).
10
H. D. Matthews, K. Zickfeld, M. Dickau, A. J. MacIsaac, S. Mathesius, C. M. Nzotungicimpaye, A. Luers, Temporary nature-based carbon removal can lower peak warming in a well-below 2° C scenario. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 65 (2022).
11
W. R. L. Anderegg, A. T. Trugman, G. Badgley, C. M. Anderson, A. Bartuska, P. Ciais, D. Cullenward, C. B. Field, J. Freeman, S. J. Goetz, J. A. Hicke, D. Huntzinger, R. B. Jackson, J. Nickerson, S. Pacala, J. T. Randerson, Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science 368, eaaz7005 (2020).
12
A. C. Soterroni, F. M. Ramos, A. Mosnier, J. Fargione, P. R. Andrade, L. Baumgarten, J. Pirker, M. Obersteiner, F. Kraxner, G. Câmara, A. X. Y. Carvalho, S. Polasky, Expanding the soy moratorium to Brazil’s Cerrado. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav7336 (2019).
13
C. A. J. Girardin, S. Jenkins, N. Seddon, M. Allen, S. L. Lewis, C. E. Wheeler, B. W. Griscom, Y. Malhi, Nature-based solutions can help cool the planet - if we act now. Nature 593, 191–194 (2021).
14
C. M. Anderson, R. S. DeFries, R. Litterman, P. A. Matson, D. C. Nepstad, S. Pacala, W. H. Schlesinger, M. R. Shaw, P. Smith, C. Weber, C. B. Field, Natural climate solutions are not enough. Science 363, 933–934 (2019).
15
UNFCCC, Paris Agreement (United Nations, 2015); https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf.
16
L. Berrang-Ford, A. R. Siders, A. Lesnikowski, A. P. Fischer, M. W. Callaghan, N. R. Haddaway, K. J. Mach, M. Araos, M. A. R. Shah, M. Wannewitz, D. Doshi, T. Leiter, C. Matavel, J. I. Musah-Surugu, G. Wong-Parodi, P. Antwi-Agyei, I. Ajibade, N. Chauhan, W. Kakenmaster, C. Grady, V. I. Chalastani, K. Jagannathan, E. K. Galappaththi, A. Sitati, G. Scarpa, E. Totin, K. Davis, N. C. Hamilton, C. J. Kirchhoff, P. Kumar, B. Pentz, N. P. Simpson, E. Theokritoff, D. Deryng, D. Reckien, C. Zavaleta-Cortijo, N. Ulibarri, A. C. Segnon, V. Khavhagali, Y. Shang, L. Zvobgo, Z. Zommers, J. Xu, P. A. Williams, I. V. Canosa, N. van Maanen, B. van Bavel, M. van Aalst, L. L. Turek-Hankins, H. Trivedi, C. H. Trisos, A. Thomas, S. Thakur, S. Templeman, L. C. Stringer, G. Sotnik, K. D. Sjostrom, C. Singh, M. Z. Siña, R. Shukla, J. Sardans, E. A. Salubi, L. S. Safaee Chalkasra, R. Ruiz-Díaz, C. Richards, P. Pokharel, J. Petzold, J. Penuelas, J. Pelaez Avila, J. B. P. Murillo, S. Ouni, J. Niemann, M. Nielsen, M. New, P. Nayna Schwerdtle, G. Nagle Alverio, C. A. Mullin, J. Mullenite, A. Mosurska, M. D. Morecroft, J. C. Minx, G. Maskell, A. M. Nunbogu, A. K. Magnan, S. Lwasa, M. Lukas-Sithole, T. Lissner, O. Lilford, S. F. Koller, M. Jurjonas, E. T. Joe, L. T. M. Huynh, A. Hill, R. R. Hernandez, G. Hegde, T. Hawxwell, S. Harper, A. Harden, M. Haasnoot, E. A. Gilmore, L. Gichuki, A. Gatt, M. Garschagen, J. D. Ford, A. Forbes, A. D. Farrell, C. A. F. Enquist, S. Elliott, E. Duncan, E. Coughlan de Perez, S. Coggins, T. Chen, D. Campbell, K. E. Browne, K. J. Bowen, R. Biesbroek, I. D. Bhatt, R. Bezner Kerr, S. L. Barr, E. Baker, S. E. Austin, I. Arotoma-Rojas, C. Anderson, W. Ajaz, T. Agrawal, T. Z. Abu, A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 989–1000 (2021).
17
United Nations Environment Programme, “Adaptation Gap Report 2021: The gathering storm – Adapting to climate change in a post-pandemic world” (2021); https://www.unep.org/resources/adaptation-gap-report-2021.
18
I. Palomo, B. Locatelli, I. Otero, M. Colloff, E. Crouzat, A. Cuni-Sanchez, E. Gómez-Baggethun, A. González-García, A. Grêt-Regamey, A. Jiménez-Aceituno, B. Martín-López, U. Pascual, N. Zafra-Calvo, E. Bruley, M. Fischborn, R. Metz, S. Lavorel, Assessing nature-based solutions for transformative change. One Earth 4, 730–741 (2021).
19
T. Devisscher, J. Spies, V. C. Griessa, Time for change: Learning from community forests to enhance the resilience of multi-value forestry in British Columbia, Canada. Land Use Policy 103, 105317 (2021).
20
A. Chausson, B. Turner, D. Seddon, N. Chabaneix, C. A. J. Girardin, V. Kapos, I. Key, D. Roe, A. Smith, S. Woroniecki, N. Seddon, Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 6134–6155 (2020).
21
K. Sudmeier-Rieux, T. Arce-Mojica, H. J. Boehmer, N. Doswald, L. Emerton, D. A. Friess, S. Galvin, M. Hagenlocher, H. James, P. Laban, C. Lacambra, W. Lange, B. G. McAdoo, C. Moos, J. Mysiak, L. Narvaez, U. Nehren, P. Peduzzi, F. G. Renaud, S. Sandholz, L. Schreyers, Z. Sebesvari, T. Tom, A. Triyanti, P. van Eijk, M. van Staveren, M. Vicarelli, Y. Walz, Scientific evidence for ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction. Nat. Sustain. 4, 803–810 (2021).
22
L. Ruangpan, Z. Vojinovic, S. Di Sabatino, L. S. Leo, V. Capobianco, A. M. P. Oen, M. E. McClain, E. Lopez-Gunn, Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological risk reduction: A state-of-the-art review of the research area. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 243–270 (2020).
23
P. Herath, M. Thatcher, H. Jin, X. Bai, Effectiveness of urban surface characteristics as mitigation strategies for the excessive summer heat in cities. Sustain Cities Soc. 72, 103072 (2021).
24
S. Kuyah, C. W. Whitney, M. Jonsson, G. W. Sileshi, I. Öborn, C. W. Muthuri, E. Luedeling, Agroforestry delivers a win-win solution for ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa. A meta-analysis. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 39, 47 (2019).
25
S. Kay, C. Rega, G. Moreno, M. den Herder, J. H. N. Palma, R. Borek, J. Crous-Duran, D. Freese, M. Giannitsopoulos, A. Graves, M. Jäger, N. Lamersdorf, D. Memedemin, R. Mosquera-Losada, A. Pantera, M. L. Paracchini, P. Paris, J. V. Roces-Díaz, V. Rolo, A. Rosati, M. Sandor, J. Smith, E. Szerencsits, A. Varga, V. Viaud, R. Wawer, P. J. Burgess, F. Herzog, Agroforestry creates carbon sinks whilst enhancing the environment in agricultural landscapes in Europe. Land Use Policy 83, 581–593 (2019).
26
The Royal Society, Royal Academy of Engineering, “Greenhouse gas removal” (The Royal Society, 2018); https://royalsociety.org/greenhouse-gas-removal.
27
J. Hinkel, D. Lincke, A. T. Vafeidis, M. Perrette, R. J. Nicholls, R. S. J. Tol, B. Marzeion, X. Fettweis, C. Ionescu, A. Levermann, Coastal flood damage and adaptation costs under 21st century sea-level rise. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 3292–3297 (2014).
28
A. B. Rodriguez, F. J. Fodrie, J. T. Ridge, N. L. Lindquist, E. J. Theuerkauf, S. E. Coleman, J. H. Grabowski, M. C. Brodeur, R. K. Gittman, D. A. Keller, M. D. Kenworthy, Oyster reefs can outpace sea-level rise. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 493–497 (2014).
29
B. P. Harman, S. Heyenga, B. M. Taylor, C. S. Fletcher, Global lessons for adapting coastal communities to protect against storm surge inundation. J. Coast. Res. 31, 790–801 (2015).
30
S. Hynes, R. Burger, J. Tudella, D. Norton, W. Chen, Estimating the costs and benefits of protecting a coastal amenity from climate change-related hazards: Nature based solutions via oyster reef restoration versus grey infrastructure. Ecol. Econ. 194, 107349 (2022).
31
R. L. Morris, A. Boxshall, S. E. Swearer, Climate-resilient coasts require diverse defence solutions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 485–487 (2020).
32
W. Chen, W. Wang, G. Huang, Z. Wang, C. Lai, Z. Yang, The capacity of grey infrastructure in urban flood management: A comprehensive analysis of grey infrastructure and the green-grey approach. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 54, 102045 (2021).
33
J. Reise, A. Siemons, H. Böttcher, A. Herold, C. Urrutia, L. Schneider, E. Iwaszuk, H. McDonald, A. Frelih-Larsen, L. Duin, M. Davis, “Nature-based solutions and global climate protection. Assessment of their global mitigation potential and recommendations for international climate policy” (German Environment Agency, 2022).
34
S. C. Cook-Patton, C. R. Drever, B. W. Griscom, K. Hamrick, H. Hardman, T. Kroeger, P. Pacheco, S. Raghav, M. Stevenson, C. Webb, S. Yeo, P. W. Ellis, Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 1027–1034 (2021).
35
J. E. M. Watson, T. Evans, O. Venter, B. Williams, A. Tulloch, C. Stewart, I. Thompson, J. C. Ray, K. Murray, A. Salazar, C. McAlpine, P. Potapov, J. Walston, J. G. Robinson, M. Painter, D. Wilkie, C. Filardi, W. F. Laurance, R. A. Houghton, S. Maxwell, H. Grantham, C. Samper, S. Wang, L. Laestadius, R. K. Runting, G. A. Silva-Chávez, J. Ervin, D. Lindenmayer, The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 599–610 (2018).
36
S. Roe, C. Streck, R. Beach, J. Busch, M. Chapman, V. Daioglou, A. Deppermann, J. Doelman, J. Emmet-Booth, J. Engelmann, O. Fricko, C. Frischmann, J. Funk, G. Grassi, B. Griscom, P. Havlik, S. Hanssen, F. Humpenöder, D. Landholm, G. Lomax, J. Lehmann, L. Mesnildrey, G.-J. Nabuurs, A. Popp, C. Rivard, J. Sanderman, B. Sohngen, P. Smith, E. Stehfest, D. Woolf, D. Lawrence, Land-based measures to mitigate climate change: Potential and feasibility by country. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 6025–6058 (2021).
37
L. V. Gatti, L. S. Basso, J. B. Miller, M. Gloor, L. Gatti Domingues, H. L. G. Cassol, G. Tejada, L. E. O. C. Aragão, C. Nobre, W. Peters, L. Marani, E. Arai, A. H. Sanches, S. M. Corrêa, L. Anderson, C. Von Randow, C. S. C. Correia, S. P. Crispim, R. A. L. Neves, Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change. Nature 595, 388–393 (2021).
38
C. A. Boulton, T. M. Lenton, N. Boers, Pronounced loss of Amazon rainforest resilience since the early 2000s. Nat. Clim. Chang. 12, 271–278 (2022).
39
C. Moritz, R. Agudo, The future of species under climate change: Resilience or decline? Science 341, 504–508 (2013).
40
I. Schulte, J. Eggers, J. Ø. Nielsen, S. Fuss, What influences the implementation of natural climate solutions? A systematic map and review of the evidence. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 013002 (2021).
41
J. Nalau, S. Becken, B. Mackey, Ecosystem-based Adaptation: A review of the constraints. Environ. Sci. Policy 89, 357–364 (2018).
42
Y. Zeng, T. V. Sarira, L. R. Carrasco, K. Y. Chong, D. A. Friess, J. S. H. Lee, P. Taillardat, T. A. Worthington, Y. Zhang, L. P. Koh, Economic and social constraints on reforestation for climate mitigation in Southeast Asia. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 842–844 (2020).
43
M. Li, G. Trencher, J. Asuka, The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: A mismatch between discourse, actions and investments. PLOS ONE 17, e0263596 (2022).
44
H. Tugendhat, “Re-thinking nature-based solutions: seeking transformative change through culture and rights” (Forest Peoples Programme, 2020).
45
J. D. Ford, N. King, E. K. Galappaththi, T. Pearce, G. McDowell, S. L. Harper, The resilience of indigenous peoples to environmental change. One Earth 2, 532–543 (2020).
46
T. H. Oliver, M. S. Heard, N. J. B. Isaac, D. B. Roy, D. Procter, F. Eigenbrod, R. Freckleton, A. Hector, C. D. L. Orme, O. L. Petchey, V. Proença, D. Raffaelli, K. B. Suttle, G. M. Mace, B. Martín-López, B. A. Woodcock, J. M. Bullock, Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 673–684 (2015).
47
S. L. Lewis, C. E. Wheeler, E. T. A. Mitchard, A. Koch, Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon. Nature 568, 25–28 (2019).
48
F. Fleischman, S. Basant, A. Chhatre, E. A. Coleman, H. W. Fischer, D. Gupta, B. Güneralp, P. Kashwan, D. Khatri, R. Muscarella, J. S. Powers, V. Ramprasad, P. Rana, C. R. Solorzano, J. W. Veldman, Pitfalls of tree planting show why we need people-centered natural climate solutions. Bioscience 70, 947–950 (2020).
49
F. Hua, L. A. Bruijnzeel, P. Meli, P. A. Martin, J. Zhang, S. Nakagawa, X. Miao, W. Wang, C. McEvoy, J. L. Peña-Arancibia, P. H. S. Brancalion, P. Smith, D. P. Edwards, A. Balmford, The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches. Science 376, 839–844 (2022).
50
R. Frazin, “Trump creates federal government council on global tree planting initiative,” The Hill (2020); https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/520852-trump-creates-federal-government-council-on-global-tree-planting.
51
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Guidance for using the IUCN Global Standard for nature-based solutions. A user-friendly framework for the verification, design and scaling up or nature-based solutions (IUCN, ed. 1, 2020); https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2020-021-En.pdf.
52
U. Pascual, P. Balvanera, S. Díaz, G. Pataki, E. Roth, M. Stenseke, R. T. Watson, E. Başak Dessane, M. Islar, E. Kelemen, V. Maris, M. Quaas, S. M. Subramanian, H. Wittmer, A. Adlan, S. E. Ahn, Y. S. Al-Hafedh, E. Amankwah, S. T. Asah, P. Berry, A. Bilgin, S. J. Breslow, C. Bullock, D. Cáceres, H. Daly-Hassen, E. Figueroa, C. D. Golden, E. Gómez-Baggethun, D. González-Jiménez, J. Houdet, H. Keune, R. Kumar, K. Ma, P. H. May, A. Mead, P. O’Farrell, R. Pandit, W. Pengue, R. Pichis-Madruga, F. Popa, S. Preston, D. Pacheco-Balanza, H. Saarikoski, B. B. Strassburg, M. van den Belt, M. Verma, F. Wickson, N. Yagi, Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26–27, 7–16 (2017).
53
W. R. Moomaw, S. A. Masino, E. K. Faison, Intact forests in the United States: Proforestation mitigates climate change and serves the greatest good. Front. For. Glob. Change 2, 27 (2019).
54
G. Peterson St-Laurent, L. E. Oakes, M. Cross, S. Hagerman, R-R-T (resistance-resilience-transformation) typology reveals differential conservation approaches across ecosystems and time. Commun. Biol. 4, 39 (2021).
55
M. L. Cárdenas, V. Wilde, A. Hagen-Zanker, I. Seifert-Dähnn, M. G. Hutchins, S. Loiselle, The circular benefits of participation in nature-based solutions. Sustainability 13, 4344 (2021).
56
A. Scheidel, C. Work, Forest plantations and climate change discourses: New powers of ‘green’grabbing in Cambodia. Land Use Policy 77, 9–18 (2018).
57
C. Cavanagh, T. A. Benjaminsen, Virtual nature, violent accumulation: The ‘spectacular failure’of carbon offsetting at a Ugandan National Park. Geoforum 56, 55–65 (2014).
58
M. Sowman, J. Sunde, Social impacts of marine protected areas in South Africa on coastal fishing communities. Ocean Coast. Manage. 157, 168–179 (2018).
59
I. Anguelovski, C. Irazábal‐Zurita, J. J. Connolly, Grabbed urban landscapes: Socio‐spatial tensions in green infrastructure planning in Medellín. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 43, 133–156 (2019).
(0)eLetters
eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Neither embedded figures nor equations with special characters can be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures and equations within eLetters in general. If a figure or equation is essential, please include within the text of the eLetter a link to the figure, equation, or full text with special characters at a public repository with versioning, such as Zenodo. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.
Log In to Submit a ResponseNo eLetters have been published for this article yet.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Science
Volume 376 | Issue 6600
24 June 2022
24 June 2022
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
This is an article distributed under the terms of the Science Journals Default License.
Submission history
Received: 31 March 2022
Accepted: 18 May 2022
Published in print: 24 June 2022
Acknowledgments
The author thanks A. Chausson, J. Lynch, A. Smith, A. Soterroni, B. Turner, and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and A. Wagner and D. Seddon for help with the figures.
Funding: This work was supported by the Waterloo Foundation and the Natural Environment Research Council.
Competing interests: The author is on the Adaptation Committee of the UK’s Climate Change Committee, advising on land, biodiversity, and agriculture.
License information: Copyright © 2022 the authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original US government works. https://www.science.org/about/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse
Authors
Funding Information
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
- 268 citation in Crossref
- 233 citation in Web of Science
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite as
- Nathalie Seddon
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Cited by
- The land use-climate change-biodiversity nexus in the perceptions of European islands stakeholders, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 117, (108199), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108199
- Elevation-dependent historical dynamics of soil organic carbon stocks, Tianshan Mountains, arid central Asia, Soil and Tillage Research, 256, (106914), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106914
- Challenges and opportunities to tree planting on working landscapes: Insights from New York dairy farmers, Journal of Rural Studies, 121, (103899), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103899
- A multi-level hierarchy decision-making framework for the implementation of novel regenerative supply chain management practices in construction, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 116, (108128), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108128
- Nature-based building blocks (NB3) framework for scaling up nature-based solutions in coastal adaptation, Nature-Based Solutions, 8, (100259), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100259
- Coastal resilience could be enhanced by co-interventions and synergistic Nature-based Solutions, Nature-Based Solutions, 8, (100244), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100244
- Drivers and spatial modelling of soil organic carbon in Argentinian subtropical forests: Path towards sustainable management and climate mitigation, Forest Ecology and Management, 597, (123128), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123128
- Quantifying the role of mangroves in carbon sequestration in Qatar, Ecological Informatics, 90, (103332), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103332
- Research trends in CO2 utilization: Catalytic strategies for sustainable energy and environmental protection, Journal of CO2 Utilization, 101, (103216), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2025.103216
- Functional identity drives tree species richness-induced ecosystem carbon allocation in subtropical forests, Forest Ecology and Management, 595, (123007), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123007
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Log in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
More options
Register for free to read this article
As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.
