Advertisement

Abstract

Strong electron correlation and spin-orbit coupling (SOC) can have a profound influence on the electronic properties of materials. We examine their combined influence on a 2-dimensional electronic system at the atomic interface between magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene and a tungsten diselenide crystal. Strong electron correlation within the moiré flatband stabilizes correlated insulating states at both quarter and half filling, and SOC transforms these Mott-like insulators into ferromagnets, evidenced by robust anomalous Hall effect with hysteretic switching behavior. The coupling between spin and valley degrees of freedom is demonstrated through the control of the magnetic order with an in-plane magnetic field, or a perpendicular electric field. Our findings establish an experimental knob to engineer topological properties of moiré bands in twisted bilayer graphene and related systems.
The van der Waals (vdW) moiré structures are an intriguing platform for exploring the interplay of correlation, topology and broken symmetry in 2-dimensional (2D) electronic systems. The rotational alignment between two sheets of vdW crystal gives rise to a flat moiré energy band where strong Coulomb correlation plays a dominating role in a rich landscape of emergent quantum phenomena (17). In a graphene moiré structure, breaking the C2T symmetry was shown to stabilize spontaneous orbital ferromagnetism at quarter and three-quarter filling, which is manifested in robust anomalous Hall effect (AHE) with hysteretic switching transitions (811). Unlike one and three-quarter filling, a potential orbital ferromagnetic state at half-filled moiré band would feature a spin-unpolarized edge mode that is able to proximate superconducting pairing along a ferromagnet/superconducting interface (12). Such construction has been proposed to be key in realizing the Majorana mode. However, an orbital ferromagnet is predicted to be energetically unfavorable in twisted graphene structures, owing to the inter-valley Hund’s coupling (1316).
As an essential ingredient in forming certain topological phases, spin-orbit coupling (SOC) provides an additional experimental knob to engineer the topological properties of moiré structures (1719). It was recently proposed that SOC endows the moiré energy band with nonzero Berry curvature, making ferromagnetic order at half moiré filling a possibility without alignment with the hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) substrate (16, 20). Unlike bulk materials, where tuning the chemical composition is required to produce spin-orbit locking, an alternative route through the proximity effect exists in vdW structures. Close proximity between graphene and transition metal dichalcogenide crystals, such as tungsten diselenide (WSe2), allows electron wavefunctions from both crystals to overlap and hybridize, endowing graphene with strong SOC (2128). In this work, we use transport measurement to examine the effect of proximity-induced SOC on properties of the moiré band and its associated quantum phases.
The geometry of the twisted bilayer graphene (tBLG)/WSe2 heterostructure is shown in Fig. 1A. An atomic interface is created by stacking a few-layer WSe2 crystal on top of magic angle tBLG, which is further encapsulated with dual hBN and graphite crystals on top and bottom to achieve optimal sample quality (29). Transport measurement indicates excellent sample quality with low charge fluctuation δn ~ 0.08 (1012 cm–2) (see fig. S10). Longitudinal resistance Rxx measured from tBLG exhibits a series of well-defined resistance peaks emerging at partial filling of the moiré band, ν = –2, +1, +2, and +3, which are associated with the correlated insulator (CIs) states. The positions of these peaks are consistent with a twist angle of θ ≈ 0.98°. The tBLG and hBN substrate are maximally misaligned according to the optical image of the heterostructure (see fig. S2) (16), which is consistent with the fact that the sample appears gapless at the charge neutrality point (CNP) [see (16) for more discussions regarding the coupling between tBLG and hBN] (8, 9). Transverse resistance measurements reveal large Hall resistance Rxy at ν = +1 and +2; the Hall resistance exhibits hysteretic switching behavior as the field-effect induced doping in tBLG, ntBLG, is swept back and forth (Fig. 1C). Hysteresis in magnetization reversal is also observed while sweeping an external magnetic field aligned perpendicular to the 2D interface, B (Fig. 1, D and E). We note that the resistance peak at ν = +2 vanishes at large in-plane B-field (see fig. S9) (16), indicating a spin-unpolarized isospin configuration. As such, the ground state is likely valley-polarized and the ferromagnetic order is orbital. This is further illustrated by a schematic representation of the band structure (right panels of Fig. 1, D and E), where the two lowest conduction bands feature the same valley index with nonzero Chern number of C = –3 and +1.
Fig. 1. Emerging ferromagnetic order from the tBLG/WSe2 interface.
(A) Schematic of the heterostructure consisting of a tBLG/WSe2 interface, which is doubly encapsulated with hBN and graphite. (B) Calculated dispersion of moiré bands for a single valley. λI and λR indicate the strength of Ising and Rashba SOC, respectively in units of meV. Red and blue color denote the out-of-plane component of spin moment of each band. Chern number is expected to be zero for all energy bands in the absence of λR (left and middle panel). The combination of strong Ising and Rashba SOC gives rise to nonzero valley Chern number. The value of λI and λR are taken from previous measurements of proximity induced SOC (27, 44). (C) Longitudinal and transverse resistance, Rxx and Rxy, as carrier density ntBLG is swept back and forth. Carrier density ntBLG and moiré filling ν are denoted as the bottom and top axis, respectively. The measurement is performed at B = 10 mT, T = 20 mK and D = 252 mV/nm. (D and E) Rxy measured at (D) ntBLG = 0.55 × 1012 cm–2 near ν = 1 and (E) ntBLG = 1.22 × 1012 cm–2 near ν = 2, as B is swept back and forth. These measurements are performed at D = 0. The hysteresis loop disappears at high temperature. Right panels: schematic band structure at (D) ν = +1 and (E) ν = +2. For (E), the two lowest bands feature the same valley index and have nonzero Chern numbers of C = –3 and +1. As a result, the ground state at ν = 2 is valley polarized with net Chern number Cnet = –2.
A valley polarized state at ν = 2 is unfavorable in the absence of SOC because of the influence of inter-valley Hund’s coupling [see (16) for a more detailed discussion] (1316). As a result, observing orbital ferromagnetism at the half-filled moiré band has remained elusive (8, 9, 30). To this end, the AHE at ν = +2 in our sample provides strong evidence that the moiré band structure is transformed by proximity-induced SOC, which is more dominant compared to inter-valley Hund’s coupling (20). Although the presence of SOC endows the moiré flatband with a nonzero Chern number, as shown in Fig. 1, D and E, the observed Hall resistance is much smaller than the expected value of the quantum anomalous Hall effect. We ascribe this behavior to the presence of bulk conduction channels parallel to the chiral edge conduction, which could result from the presence of magnetic domain walls (8) or sample disorder. A fully developed Chern insulator state could be realized in a sample with lower disorder or stronger SOC, hence a larger energy gap.
To better understand the influence of proximity-induced SOC, we note that the introduction of SOC adds an extra term to the Hamiltonian:
hSOCk=12λIτzsz+12λRτzσxsyσysx
(1)
Here τ, σ and s denote the Pauli matrix for valley, sublattice and spin at each momentum k, whereas λI and λR represent the Ising and Rashba SOC coefficients, respectively (See eqs. S3 to S7 for more detailed discussions) (16). The Ising SOC locks the valley moment τz with the spin moment sz, whereas the Rashba term λR locks the in-plane spin sx, sy with the sublattice σx, σy (the locking depends on the valley τz). For tBLG without SOC, there is a C2 symmetry defined as C2xσx and time reversal symmetry defined as T:iτxsyK, where K is the complex conjugation. Both the Ising and Rashba SOC break the C2 symmetry, while preserving the time reversal. Therefore, C2T is broken in the presence of proximity-induced SOC.
The combination of Rashba SOC and time reversal symmetry gives rise to a valley-contrasting spin texture within the mini Brillouin Zone (MBZ) for each band: for any momentum k, spin for the two valleys points in opposite directions, sK(k) = –sK´(–k). The average value of in-plane spin moment of each band is obtained by integrating over the MBZ for valley K (K´),
SK,K=1NkMBZsK,Kk
(2)
where N is the system size. We note that a broken C3 rotation symmetry could lead to nonzero SK and SK. In this scenario, time reversal symmetry is preserved by the valley-contrasting spin texture SK=SK. On the other hand, an orbital ferromagnetic state emerges because valley-polarized Chern bands are occupied, spontaneously breaking time reversal symmetry. Most remarkably, the combination of SOC, valley polarization and a broken C3 rotation symmetry allows an in-plane magnetic field to couple to the orbital magnetic order through the in-plane Zeeman energy.
This control of the out-of-plane magnetic order using an in-plane magnetic field B|| is demonstrated in Fig. 2, B and C: as B|| is swept back and forth, Rxy exhibits hysteretic switching behavior at both ν = +1 and +2. Using Hall resistance measurements, we show that the out-of-plane component of the B-field is negligible compared to the out-of-plane coercive field, confirming that the magnetic order is indeed controlled by the in-plane component of the B-field, B|| (see fig. S4). At the same time, direct coupling between the valley order and B|| is shown to be absent in tBLG samples without SOC (31), which rules out the orbital effect as a possible origin for the observed B||-dependence. Taken together, we conclude that B and B|| couple to the magnetic order through different mechanisms: B directly controls the magnetic ground state through valley Zeeman coupling, EZv=γvBτz, whereas the influence of B|| arises from the combination of SOC and spin Zeeman coupling, EZs=γsτzBS. Here τz corresponds to the valley polarization, γv and γs are valley and spin gyromagnetic ratio, respectively.
Fig. 2. Controlling magnetic order using an in-plane magnetic field.
(A) Schematic showing the effect of SOC, which couples the in-plane component of spin, ±S||, with the out-of-plane component of valley, τz = K and K´. (B and C) Rxy as a function of in-plane B field, which is aligned within 0.5° of the tBLG/WSe2 interface. Traces and retraces are shown as blue and red solid lines, respectively. The measurement is performed at (B) ν = +1 and D = –167 mV/nm, (C) ν = +2 and D = 0. (D) The orientation of in-plane spin momentum over the MBZ for valley K, which is obtained by diagonalizing the single particle Hamiltonian [Fig. 1B, see (16) for a more detailed discussion]. Here we show the first conduction band with valley index K above the neutrality. In the presence of C3 symmetry, SK averages to zero (left panel), whereas a uniaxial strain breaks C3, resulting in nonzero SK (right panel).
We note a few intriguing properties of the B-induced hysteresis behavior in Figs. 1 and 2: (i) a large B|| stabilizes opposite magnetic orders at ν = +1 and +2, which is evidenced by Rxy with opposite signs (Fig. 2, B and C). This indicates that 〈S||〉 points in opposite directions for ν = +1 and +2. On the other hand, an out-of-plane B-field stabilizes the same magnetic order at different fillings (Fig. 1, D and E), providing further confirmation that ν = +1 and +2 feature the same valley index and the ground state at half-filling is valley polarized; (ii) although the out-of-plane coercive fields are similar, the in-plane coercive field at ν = 2 is much bigger compared to ν = 1. This suggests that the average in-plane spin moment 〈S||〉 is much smaller at ν = 2, which is consistent with a predominantly spin unpolarized ground state (fig. S9) (16). It is worth pointing out that the observed behavior at ν = +2 does not rule out alternative isospin configurations. Our results provide important constraints for future theoretical work to examine such possibilities. The effective control of in-plane B-field on the magnetic order not only provides further validation that the orbital ferromagnetic order is stabilized by proximity-induced SOC, it also reveals that a broken C3 rotational symmetry gives rise to a nonzero 〈S||〉. A spontaneously broken C3 symmetry naturally derives from the combination of strong SOC and nematic charge order (3234). Alternatively, a preferred in-plane direction for spin could result from small amount of uniaxial strain in the moiré lattice (Fig. 2D), which is shown to be common for tBLG samples (35, 36).
The proximity-induced SOC arises from wavefunction overlap across the interface (22). The role of wavefunction overlap was recently demonstrated experimentally, as SOC strength was shown to depend on interlayer separation, which is tunable with hydrostatic pressure (37). In the same vein, we show that SOC strength can be controlled with a perpendicular electric field D: under a positive (negative) D, charge carriers are polarized toward (away from) the WSe2 crystal, resulting in increased (decreased) wavefunction overlap and stronger (weaker) SOC (Fig. 3A) (22, 37). Figure 3 demonstrates the effect of D by plotting the evolution of B-induced hysteresis loops: with increasing D, hysteresis loops exhibit larger coercive fields (B and B) for both ν = +1 and +2 (Fig. 3, B and C). Transport measurements near the CNP show that the width of the disorder regime remains the same over a wide range of D-field (see fig. S10B), suggesting that changes in the coercive field are not caused by the influence of disorder across two graphene layers. Because the value of the coercive field reflects the robustness of magnetic order, the D-dependence shown in Fig. 3C provides another indication that the orbital ferromagnetism is stabilized by proximity-induced SOC.
Fig. 3. Displacement-field dependence.
(A) Schematic demonstrating the effect of electric displacement D on layer polarization. (B) B-induced hysteresis loops of Rxy measured at different D with B-field aligned perpendicular to the 2D layers. (C) Out-of-plane coercive fields B and B for both ν = +1 and +2 as a function of D. (D) Same as (B), but for B-field parallel to the 2D layers. (E) Same as (C), but for in-plane coercive fields B and B . B (B) is defined as the value of B where the sign of Rxy switches from negative to positive (positive to negative), whereas the superscript denotes the orientation of the B-field (See fig. S11) (16). Both in-plane and out-of-plane magnetic hysteresis behaviors for ν = +1 are measured at T = 20 mK. At ν = +2, out-of-plane magnetic hysteresis is measured at T = 20 mK, whereas in-plane hysteresis is measured at T ≤ 3 K (see fig. S11 for more details) (16). (F) 〈S||〉 calculated from the 4-band model as a function of D for the two lowest energy bands, band 1 and 2 for the valley K. Both bands feature large 〈S||〉 that are mostly independent of D, shown as red and pink traces, respectively. The combination of band 1 and 2 yields a nonzero, albeit small, 〈S||〉, which changes sign around D = 0.
Most interestingly, the effect of varying D at ν = +2 is drastically different in the presence of an in-plane magnetic field B||: changing D induces a magnetization reversal, which is evidenced by hysteresis loops with opposite signs in Rxy (Fig. 3D and fig. S12A) (16). The D-induced reversal is also manifested in the sign change of coercive field B and B at D ~ –100 mV/nm (Fig. 3E). A possible explanation for this unique D-dependence is obtained by examining the average in-plane spin moment for valley K, SK. Calculations using the 4-band model show that SK changes sign with varying D at ν = 2 (Fig. 3F), indicating that an in-plane B-field favors opposite valley polarizations at different D. By comparison, Fig. 3F shows that no sign change in SK is expected at ν = 1, which is consistent with our experimental observation (Fig. 3E). Because carrier density remains the same when changing D, the D-controlled magnetization reversal represents electric field control of the magnetic order, which is made possible by proximity induced SOC.
Next, we turn our attention to the effect of SOC on the isospin polarization and superconductivity. In the absence of SOC, the ground state at ν = –1 was shown to be isospin unpolarized at B = 0 (38, 39). The application of a large in-plane magnetic field lifts the isospin degeneracy, stabilizing an isospin ferromagnetic state (IF3) near ν = –1, which is separated from the unpolarized state (IU) by a resistance peak in Rxx and a step in the Hall density (38, 39). Figure 4, A and B, shows that this phase boundary between IF3 and IU extends to B|| = 0 in the presence of proximity-induced SOC. Taken together, the influence of SOC on the iso-spin degeneracy is comparable to a large in-plane magnetic field (see fig. S7) (16). Notably, we show that the superconducting phase is unstable against proximity-induced SOC in our sample. As shown in Fig. 4C, no zero-resistance state is observed over the full density range of the moiré band. In addition, RxxT traces exhibit no clear downturn with decreasing T at moiré filling ν = –2 – δ, where a robust superconducting phase usually emerges in magic-angle tBLG (Fig. 4D). Because strong Ising and Rashba SOC break C2T symmetry, the absence of superconductivity, combined with the emergence of AHE are potentially consistent with a recent theoretical proposal that C2T symmetry is essential for stabilizing the superconducting phase in tBLG (40). Our results are distinct from another experimental report showing robust superconductivity stabilized by SOC in tBLG away from the magic angle (28). Apart from the difference in twist angle range, these distinct observations could result from a few other factors that will be discussed in the following. The D-dependence shown in Fig. 3 suggests that a dual-gated geometry, which allows independent control on D and ntBLG, is key to investigating the influence of proximity-induced SOC in WSe2/tBLG samples. When carrier density is controlled with only the bottom gate electrode (28), doping tBLG with electron also gives rise to a D-field that pulls electrons away from the WSe2 crystal (see fig. S1) (16). This results in weaker SOC strength, which could contribute to the observation of superconductivity in singly-gated tBLG/WSe2 samples (28). In addition, it is proposed that the strength of proximity-induced SOC is sensitive to the rotational alignment between graphene and WSe2: strong SOC is expected when graphene is rotationally misaligned with WSe2 by 10–20°, whereas perfect alignment produces weak proximity-induced SOC (41). If confirmed, this rotational degree of freedom could provide an additional experimental knob to engineer moiré band structure (42). Our sample features a twist angle of ~16° (fig. S1F) between tBLG and WSe2, falling in the range that is predicted to induce the strongest SOC strength. The effect of rotational misalignment between tBLG and WSe2 is investigated in two additional samples near the magic angle: AHE and hysteresis loops are observed at hν = +2 in sample A1 where tBLG and WSe2 are misaligned at ~10° (fig. S14). On the other hand, tBLG and WSe2 are perfectly aligned in sample A2, where AHE is absent (fig. S15) (16). The superconducting phase is absent or significantly suppressed in all samples. These observations provide experimental support for the notion that the rotational misalignment between tBLG/WSe2, and thus the SOC strength, play a key role in determining the stability of the ferromagnetic and superconducting states. Although transport measurement alone cannot definitively confirm the influence of SOC on the superconducting phase near the magic angle, our results could motivate future efforts, both theoretical and experimental, to investigate the influence of SOC on moiré structures as a function of graphene twist angle and graphene/WSe2 misalignment (42).
Fig. 4. Isospin order and the absence of superconductivity.
(A) Rxx as a function of moiré filling ν and in-plane magnetic field B|| measured at T = 20 mK. Carrier density is controlled by sweeping bottom gate voltage while top gate voltage is kept at zero. (B) Renormalized Hall density, νH – ν0, expressed in electrons per superlattice unit cell, measured at different B|| and B for D = 252 mV/nm. Circles in (A) denote the phase boundary between symmetry breaking isospin ferromagnets (IF2 and IF3) and an isospin unpolarized state (IU), which are defined as the peak position in dH – ν0)/dν. The expected Hall density steps of tBLG without SOC are shown in light blue for each panel in (B) (38). (C) Longitudinal resistance Rxx as a function of temperature and moiré filling measured at B = 0 and D = 252 mV/nm. (D) RT line trace extracted from (C) along the vertical dashed lines. Inset: Rxx increases slightly with increasing B, but decreases with B||, displaying no clear indication of Zeeman induced Cooper pair breaking

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge helpful discussions with A.F. Young, M. Yankowtiz and A. Vishwanath, as well as experimental assistance from A. Mounce and M. Lilly. Funding: This work was primarily supported by Brown University. Device fabrication was performed in the Institute for Molecular and Nanoscale Innovation at Brown University. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science. J.L., E.M. and J.I.A.L. acknowledge the use of equipment funded by the MRI award DMR-1827453. Synthesis of WSe2 (S.L., D.R., J.H.) at Columbia was supported by the National Science Foundation MRSEC program through the Center for Precision-Assembled Quantum Materials (DMR-2011738). K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the EMEXT Element Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center, Grant Number JPMXP0112101001 and the CREST(JPMJCR15F3), JST. Author contributions: J.-X.L., E.M., and Z.W. fabricated the devices and performed the measurements. J.-X.L., E.M., Z.W., and J.I.A.L. analyzed the data. Y.-H.Z. constructed the theoretical model. K.W. and T.T. provided the hBN crystals. S.L., D.R., and J.H. provided the WSe2 crystals. The manuscript was written with input from all authors. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests. Data and materials availability: Experimental data files are available at the Open Science Framework (43).

Supplementary Materials

This PDF file includes:

Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S19
References (4446)

References and Notes

1
Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 80–84 (2018).
2
Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018).
3
X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, D. K. Efetov, Superconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene. Nature 574, 653–657 (2019).
4
M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 363, 1059–1064 (2019).
5
G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, Y.-H. Zhang, S. Wang, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Shi, T. Senthil, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Y. Zhang, F. Wang, Tunable correlated Chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moiré superlattice. Nature 579, 56–61 (2020).
6
X. Liu, Z. Hao, E. Khalaf, J. Y. Lee, Y. Ronen, H. Yoo, D. Haei Najafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, P. Kim, Tunable spin-polarized correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nature 583, 221–225 (2020).
7
Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies-Bigorda, J. M. Park, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Tunable correlated states and spin-polarized phases in twisted bilayer-bilayer graphene. Nature 583, 215–220 (2020).
8
A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene. Science 365, 605–608 (2019).
9
M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moiré heterostructure. Science 367, 900–903 (2020).
10
H. Polshyn, J. Zhu, M. A. Kumar, Y. Zhang, F. Yang, C. L. Tschirhart, M. Serlin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, A. F. Young, Electrical switching of magnetic order in an orbital Chern insulator. Nature 588, 66–70 (2020).
11
S. Chen, M. He, Y.-H. Zhang, V. Hsieh, Z. Fei, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. H. Cobden, X. Xu, C. R. Dean, M. Yankowitz, Electrically tunable correlated and topological states in twisted monolayer–bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 17, 374–380 (2021).
12
X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, S.-C. Zhang, Chiral topological superconductor from the quantum Hall state. Phys. Rev. B 82, 184516 (2010).
13
Y.-H. Zhang, D. Mao, Y. Cao, P. Jarillo-Herrero, T. Senthil, Nearly flat Chern bands in moiré superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 99, 075127 (2019).
14
C. Repellin, Z. Dong, Y.-H. Zhang, T. Senthil, Ferromagnetism in Narrow Bands of Moiré Superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 187601 (2020).
15
N. Bultinck, S. Chatterjee, M. P. Zaletel, Mechanism for Anomalous Hall Ferromagnetism in Twisted Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 166601 (2020).
16
See supplementary materials.
17
H. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators in Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface. Nat. Phys. 5, 438–442 (2009).
18
M. Z. Hasan, C. L. Kane, Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010).
19
X.-L. Qi, S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011).
20
T. Wang, N. Bultinck, M. P. Zaletel, Flat-band topology of magic angle graphene on a transition metal dichalcogenide. Phys. Rev. B 102, 235146 (2020).
21
M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, Graphene on transition-metal dichalcogenides: A platform for proximity spin-orbit physics and optospintronics. Phys. Rev. B 92, 155403 (2015).
22
M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, Proximity Effects in Bilayer Graphene on Monolayer WSe2: Field-Effect Spin Valley Locking, Spin-Orbit Valve, and Spin Transistor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 146401 (2017).
23
Z. Wang, D.-K. Ki, H. Chen, H. Berger, A. H. MacDonald, A. F. Morpurgo, Strong interface-induced spin-orbit interaction in graphene on WS2. Nat. Commun. 6, 8339 (2015).
24
Z. Wang, D.-K. Ki, J. Y. Khoo, D. Mauro, H. Berger, L. S. Levitov, A. F. Morpurgo, Origin and Magnitude of ‘Designer’ Spin-Orbit Interaction in Graphene on Semiconducting Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. X 6, 041020 (2016).
25
B. Yang, M. Lohmann, D. Barroso, I. Liao, Z. Lin, Y. Liu, L. Bartels, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shi, Strong electron-hole symmetric Rashba spin-orbit coupling in graphene/monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 96, 041409 (2017).
26
A. Avsar, J. Y. Tan, T. Taychatanapat, J. Balakrishnan, G. K. W. Koon, Y. Yeo, J. Lahiri, A. Carvalho, A. S. Rodin, E. C. T. O’Farrell, G. Eda, A. H. Castro Neto, B. Özyilmaz, Spin-orbit proximity effect in graphene. Nat. Commun. 5, 4875 (2014).
27
J. O. Island, X. Cui, C. Lewandowski, J. Y. Khoo, E. M. Spanton, H. Zhou, D. Rhodes, J. C. Hone, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, L. S. Levitov, M. P. Zaletel, A. F. Young, Spin-orbit-driven band inversion in bilayer graphene by the van der Waals proximity effect. Nature 571, 85–89 (2019).
28
H. S. Arora, R. Polski, Y. Zhang, A. Thomson, Y. Choi, H. Kim, Z. Lin, I. Z. Wilson, X. Xu, J.-H. Chu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Alicea, S. Nadj-Perge, Superconductivity in metallic twisted bilayer graphene stabilized by WSe2. Nature 583, 379–384 (2020).
29
A. Zibrov, E. M. Spanton, H. Zhou, C. Kometter, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. F. Young, Even-denominator fractional quantum Hall states at an isospin transition in monolayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 14, 930–935 (2018).
30
P. Stepanov, M. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, X. Lu, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, D. K. Efetov, Competing Zero-Field Chern Insulators in Superconducting Twisted Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 197701 (2021).
31
A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Evidence of Orbital Ferromagnetism in Twisted Bilayer Graphene Aligned to Hexagonal Boron Nitride. Nano Lett. 21, 4299–4304 (2021).
32
Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, J. M. Park, N. F. Q. Yuan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. M. Fernandes, L. Fu, P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nematicity and competing orders in superconducting magic-angle graphene. Science 372, 264–271 (2021).
33
C.-C. Liu, L.-D. Zhang, W.-Q. Chen, F. Yang, Chiral Spin Density Wave and d+id Superconductivity in the Magic-Angle-Twisted Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 217001 (2018).
34
A. O. Sboychakov, A. V. Rozhkov, A. L. Rakhmanov, F. Nori, Many-body effects in twisted bilayer graphene at low twist angles. Phys. Rev. B 100, 045111 (2019).
35
L. J. McGilly, A. Kerelsky, N. R. Finney, K. Shapovalov, E.-M. Shih, A. Ghiotto, Y. Zeng, S. L. Moore, W. Wu, Y. Bai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Stengel, L. Zhou, J. Hone, X. Zhu, D. N. Basov, C. Dean, C. E. Dreyer, A. N. Pasupathy, Visualization of moiré superlattices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 580–584 (2020).
36
A. Uri, S. Grover, Y. Cao, J. A. Crosse, K. Bagani, D. Rodan-Legrain, Y. Myasoedov, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Moon, M. Koshino, P. Jarillo-Herrero, E. Zeldov, Mapping the twist-angle disorder and Landau levels in magic-angle graphene. Nature 581, 47–52 (2020).
37
B. Fülöp, A. Márffy, S. Zihlmann, M. Gmitra, E. Tóvári, B. Szentpéteri, M. Kedves, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Fabian, C. Schönenberger, P. Makk, S. Csonka, Boosting proximity spin-orbit coupling in graphene/WSe2 heterostructures via hydrostatic pressure. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 5, 82 (2021).
38
Y. Saito, F. Yang, J. Ge, X. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. I. A. Li, E. Berg, A. F. Young, Isospin Pomeranchuk effect in twisted bilayer graphene. Nature 592, 220–224 (2021).
39
A. Rozen, J. M. Park, U. Zondiner, Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Oreg, A. Stern, E. Berg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, S. Ilani, Entropic evidence for a Pomeranchuk effect in magic-angle graphene. Nature 592, 214–219 (2021).
40
E. Khalaf, S. Chatterjee, N. Bultinck, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vishwanath, Charged skyrmions and topological origin of superconductivity in magic-angle graphene. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf5299 (2021).
41
Y. Li, M. Koshino, Twist-angle dependence of the proximity spin-orbit coupling in graphene on transition-metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 99, 075438 (2019).
42
D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, L. Xian, A. Georges, A. J. Millis, J. Hone, C. R. Dean, D. N. Basov, A. N. Pasupathy, A. Rubio, Moiré heterostructures as a condensed-matter quantum simulator. Nat. Phys. 17, 155–163 (2021).
43
J.-X. Lin et al., Data repository for “Spin-orbit–driven ferromagnetism at half moiré filling in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene”; doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/UGNAV (2021).
44
Y. Saito, J. Ge, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. F. Young, Independent superconductors and correlated insulators in twisted bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 16, 926–930 (2020).
45
J. Zhu, J.-J. Su, A. H. MacDonald, Voltage-Controlled Magnetic Reversal in Orbital Chern Insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 227702 (2020).
46
Y.-H. Zhang, D. Mao, T. Senthil, Twisted bilayer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride: Anomalous Hall effect and a lattice model. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033126 (2019).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
First Release

Submission history

Received: 26 February 2021
Accepted: 15 December 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge helpful discussions with A.F. Young, M. Yankowtiz and A. Vishwanath, as well as experimental assistance from A. Mounce and M. Lilly. Funding: This work was primarily supported by Brown University. Device fabrication was performed in the Institute for Molecular and Nanoscale Innovation at Brown University. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science. J.L., E.M. and J.I.A.L. acknowledge the use of equipment funded by the MRI award DMR-1827453. Synthesis of WSe2 (S.L., D.R., J.H.) at Columbia was supported by the National Science Foundation MRSEC program through the Center for Precision-Assembled Quantum Materials (DMR-2011738). K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the EMEXT Element Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center, Grant Number JPMXP0112101001 and the CREST(JPMJCR15F3), JST. Author contributions: J.-X.L., E.M., and Z.W. fabricated the devices and performed the measurements. J.-X.L., E.M., Z.W., and J.I.A.L. analyzed the data. Y.-H.Z. constructed the theoretical model. K.W. and T.T. provided the hBN crystals. S.L., D.R., and J.H. provided the WSe2 crystals. The manuscript was written with input from all authors. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests. Data and materials availability: Experimental data files are available at the Open Science Framework (43).

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Ya-Hui Zhang
Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Erin Morissette
Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Daniel Rhodes
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan.
National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

Funding Information

Materials Research Science and Engineering Center, Northwestern Universityhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100017796: DMR-2011738
Medical Research Institute Sri Lankahttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100016247: DMR-1827453
EMEXT Element Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center Num: JPMXP0112101001
EMEXT Element Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center Num: CREST(JPMJCR15F3
EMEXT Element Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center Number: JPMXP0112101001
EMEXT Element Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center Number: CREST(JPMJCR15F3

Notes

*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

View Options

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS Log in

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media

(0)eLetters

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.