As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic worsens, understanding the effectiveness of public messaging and large-scale social distancing interventions is critical. The research and public health response communities can and should use population mobility data collected by private companies, with appropriate legal, organizational, and computational safeguards in place. When aggregated, these data can help refine interventions by providing near real-time information about changes in patterns of human movement.
Research groups and nonprofit humanitarian agencies have refined data use agreements to stipulate clear guidelines that ensure responsible data practices (1). New tools for specifying different levels of privacy for different users and providing privacy-preserving results, such as the OpenDP platform (2), will effectively manage data access, and aggregation steps have been carefully reviewed on a legal and methodological basis to ensure that the analyses follow ethical guidelines for human participants (3). To monitor social distancing interventions, for example, rather than showing individual travel or behavior patterns, information from multiple devices is aggregated in space and time, so that the data reflect an approximation of population-level mobility (4).
The estimates of aggregate flows of people are incredibly valuable. A map that examines the impact of social distancing messaging or policies on population mobility patterns, for example, will help county officials understand what kinds of messaging or policies are most effective. Comparing the public response to interventions, in terms of the rate of movement over an entire county from one day to the next, measured against a baseline from normal times, can provide insight into the degree to which recommendations on social distancing are being followed. We will need these estimates, not only now but also when we need to resume life again without risking a major resurgence.
The protection of personal privacy must be paramount. Consent-based data sharing models and data protection laws provide for the legal grounds to use personal data during emergencies, but we do not advocate the use of individual data (5, 6). The measures proposed do not need to run afoul of data protection goals, as a recent statement by the Chair of the European Data Protection Board in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak clarifies (7).
There are already precedents in Asia and Europe (8). Deutsche Telekom has shared aggregated data with Germany to help measure social distancing, in compliance with EU laws (9). The more such analyses are initiated and concluded openly, and in accordance with the law, the greater will be the public trust and our ability to produce reliable analytic insights. Associated risks should be thoughtfully addressed and weighed against the benefits of the data, which could help reduce the death toll in vulnerable populations.

References and Notes

F. Greenwood et al., “The signal code: A human rights approach to information during crisis” (Signal Program on Human Security and Technology, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, 2015);
Harvard University Privacy Tools and Privacy Insights Project, OpenDP (
Y. de Montjoye et al., Sci. Data 5, 180286 (2018).
P. Maas et al., “Facebook disaster maps: Aggregate insights for crisis response & recovery,” Facebook (2019);
California Consumer Privacy Act (2020);
B. Puckett, S. J. McMenemy, “Maintaining employees' privacy during a public health crisis,” National Law Review (2020);
“Statement of the EDPB Chair on the processing of personal data in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak” (2020);
S. Lai et al., “Assessing spread risk of Wuhan novel coronavirus within and beyond China,” medRxiv 2020.02.04.20020479 (2020);
E. Pollina, D. Busvine, “European mobile operators share data for coronavirus fight,” Reuters (2020).

Competing Interests

S.V.S. is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of BioFire Diagnostic's Trend Surveillance System, which includes paid consulting work.


eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors


Published In

Volume 368 | Issue 6487
10 April 2020

Article versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

Submission history

Published in print: 10 April 2020


Request permissions for this article.



Caroline O. Buckee* [email protected]
Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Satchit Balsari
Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Jennifer Chan
Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611.
NetHope, Inc., Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Mercè Crosas
Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02138, USA.
Francesca Dominici
Harvard Data Science Initiative, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02138, USA.
Urs Gasser
Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society, Harvard University Harvard Law School, Boston, MA 02138, USA.
Yonatan H. Grad
Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
Bryan Grenfell
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
M. Elizabeth Halloran
Center for Inference and Dynamics of Infectious Diseases, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Moritz U. G. Kraemer
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.
Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Marc Lipsitch
Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
C. Jessica E. Metcalf
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Lauren Ancel Meyers
The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78702, USA.
T. Alex Perkins
Department of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Mauricio Santillana
Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Samuel V. Scarpino
Network Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Cecile Viboud
Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Amy Wesolowski
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Andrew Schroeder
Direct Relief, Santa Barbara, CA 93117, USA.

Competing Interests

S.V.S. is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of BioFire Diagnostic's Trend Surveillance System, which includes paid consulting work.


Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations


Article Usage


Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Impact of close interpersonal contact on COVID-19 incidence: Evidence from 1 year of mobile device data, Science Advances, 8, 1, (2022)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.abi5499
  2. SARS-CoV-2 epidemic after social and economic reopening in three U.S. states reveals shifts in age structure and clinical characteristics, Science Advances, 8, 4, (2022)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.abf9868
  3. Heterogeneous impact of a lockdown on inter-municipality mobility, Physical Review Research, 3, 1, (2021).
  4. Monitoring the COVID-19 epidemic with nationwide telecommunication data, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, 26, (e2100664118), (2021).
  5. Assessing the Effect of Global Travel and Contact Restrictions on Mitigating the COVID-19 Pandemic, Engineering, (2021).
  6. Lockdowns result in changes in human mobility which may impact the epidemiologic dynamics of SARS-CoV-2, Scientific Reports, 11, 1, (2021).
  7. The nonpharmaceutical interventionist (NPI) signs of the coronavirus pandemic: a documentary typology and case study of COVID-19 signage, Journal of Documentation, ahead-of-print, ahead-of-print, (2021).
  8. Human mobility in response to COVID-19 in France, Italy and UK, Scientific Reports, 11, 1, (2021).
  9. Urban-Rural Disparities for COVID-19: Evidence from 10 Countries and Areas in the Western Pacific, Health Data Science, 2021, (1-9), (2021).
  10. Data Protection Around the World: Future Challenges, Data Protection Around the World, (269-279), (2021).
  11. See more

View Options

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Check Access

Log in to view the full text


AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.







Share article link

Share on social media