Skip to main content
Advertisement
Main content starts here
No access
Policy Forum
Ocean Governance

Mobile protected areas for biodiversity on the high seas

Protecting mobile marine species and habitats under climate change will require innovative and dynamic tools
Science
17 Jan 2020
Vol 367, Issue 6475
pp. 252-254

Abstract

A new agreement is being negotiated under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to provide legally binding mechanisms to protect the marine environment and to conserve and ensure the sustainable use of marine biodiversity on the high seas (international waters in areas beyond national jurisdiction) (1). One of the suggested objectives in the current draft text is to “apply an approach that builds ecosystem resilience to the adverse effects of climate change” when applying area-based management tools (ABMTs), including marine protected areas (MPAs). Yet even though climate change is resulting in shifts in species' ranges (2) and in the behavior of the human users of mobile, commercially valuable species (3), protection of highly mobile species and the dynamic habitats on which they depend is not currently a focus of negotiations. With the final language to be determined as early as 2020 (1), we urge negotiators to include new dynamic management tools, including mobile MPAs (mMPAs), whose boundaries shift across space and time, that could help to safeguard marine life and build ecosystem resilience by protecting dynamic habitats as well as migratory marine species in a changing ocean.

Access the full article

View all access options to continue reading this article.

Supplementary Material

File (aaz9327_maxwell_sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
United Nations, International Legally Binding Instrument Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction, Resolution 72/249 (2017), p. 4.
2
E. S. Poloczanska et al., Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 919 (2013).
3
W. W. L. Cheung et al., Glob. Change Biol. 16, 24 (2010).
4
T. E. Davies, S. M. Maxwell, K. Kaschner, C. Garilao, N. C. Ban, Nat. Sci. Rep. 7, 9569 (2017).
5
A.-L. Harrison et al., Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1571 (2018).
6
S. M. Maxwell et al., Mar. Policy 58, 42 (2015).
7
A. J. Hobday, J. R. Hartog, C. M. Spillman, O. Alves, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 68, 898 (2011).
8
E. A. Howell et al., Fish. Oceanogr. 24, 57 (2015).
9
K. D. Hyrenbach, K. A. Forney, P. K. Dayton, Aquat. Conserv. 10, 437 (2000).
10
D. J. McCauley et al., Science 351, 1148 (2016).
11
J. F. Bruno et al., Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 499 (2018).
12
D. C. Dunn et al., Mar. Policy 49, 137 (2014).
13
D. C. Dunn et al., Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20191472 (2019).
14
K. M. Gjerde, N. A. Clark, H. R. Harden-Davies, Ocean Yearb. Online 33, 1 (2019).
15
D. C. Dunn, S. M. Maxwell, A. M. Boustany, P. N. Halpin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 668 (2016).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Neither embedded figures nor equations with special characters can be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures and equations within eLetters in general. If a figure or equation is essential, please include within the text of the eLetter a link to the figure, equation, or full text with special characters at a public repository with versioning, such as Zenodo. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

ScienceAdviser

Get Science’s award-winning newsletter with the latest news, commentary, and research, free to your inbox daily.