Advertisement

Abstract

The 24th international climate conference in Katowice, Poland, in December 2018 was a major achievement in the multilateral response to climate change. More than 190 countries managed to agree on nearly all elements of a comprehensive rulebook that puts flesh on the bones of the 2015 Paris Agreement. The rules require, for the first time, that all countries provide detailed information on their climate change mitigation targets and regularly report on their progress in implementing and achieving them. However, one important chapter is still missing: rules for international carbon markets discussed under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Competing views on how to avoid “double counting”—counting the same emission reduction more than once to achieve climate mitigation targets—were a major roadblock to reaching consensus. Completing the missing chapter on Article 6 will be one of the key tasks when countries reconvene at the 25th international climate conference in Santiago, Chile, in December of this year. We highlight why resolving double counting is critical for achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement and identify essential ingredients for a robust outcome that ensures environmental effectiveness and facilitates cost-effective mitigation.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

References and Notes

1
M. A. Mehling, G. E. Metcalf, R. N. Stavins, Science 359, 997 (2018).
2
D. M. Bodansky, S. A. Hoedl, G. E. Metcalf, R. N. Stavins, Clim. Policy 16, 956 (2016).
3
C. Flachsland, R. Marschinski, O. Edenhofer, Clim. Policy 9, 358 (2009).
4
L. Schneider, S. La Hoz Theuer, Clim. Policy 19, 386 (2019).
5
C. Hood, G. Briner, M. Rocha, GHG or not GHG: Accounting for Diverse Mitigation Contributions in the Post-2020 Climate Framework (OECD/IEA, 2014).
6
L. Schneider et al., “Robust accounting of international transfers under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement,” discussion paper (German Environment Agency, 2017).
7
H. Winkler et al., “The balance sheet summary: An essential tool for transparency and robust accounting in mitigation and markets,” policy brief (Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town, 2018).
8
World Bank, Ecofys, State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018 (World Bank, 2018)
9
C. Warnecke, L. Schneider, T. Day, S. La Hoz Theuer, H. Fearnehough, Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 218 (2019).
10
International Carbon Reduction & Offsetting Alliance (ICROA), Guidance Report: Pathways to Increased Voluntary Action by Non-State Actors (ICROA, 2017).
11
W. Obergassel, F. Asche, Shaping the Paris Mechanisms Part III. An Update on Submissions on Article 6 of the Paris Agreement (Wuppertal Institut, 2017).
12
A. Marcu, M. Rambharos, Rulebook for Article 6 in the Paris Agreement. Takeaway from the COP 24 outcome (European Roundtable on Climate Change and Sustainable Transition, 2019).
13
ICAO, Assembly Resolution A39-22/2: “Consolidated statement of continuing ICAO policies and practices related to environmental protection—Global Market-based Measure (MBM) scheme” (ICAO, 2016).
14
J. Graichen, M. Cames, L. Schneider, “Categorization of INDCs in the light of Art. 6 of the Paris Agreement,” discussion paper (German Environment Agency, 2016).
15
R. Spalding-Fecher, Article 6.4 Crediting Outside of NDC Commitments Under the Paris Agreement: Issues and Options (Carbon Limits, 2017).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 366 | Issue 6462
11 October 2019

Submission history

Published in print: 11 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

M.D. acknowledges funding from National Natural Science Foundation of China (project 71690243) and Ministry of Science and Technology of China (project 2017YFA0605304). C.H. has participated in the past 3 years in paid consultancies relating to avoiding double counting that were funded by the Center for Clean Energy and Climate (C2ES) and by the New Zealand government.

Authors

Affiliations

Lambert Schneider
Oeko-Institut, Berlin, Germany.
Maosheng Duan
Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Robert Stavins
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Kelley Kizzier
Environmental Defense Fund, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Derik Broekhoff
Stockholm Environment Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Frank Jotzo
Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Harald Winkler
Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Michael Lazarus
Stockholm Environment Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrew Howard
Koru Climate, Bonn, Germany.
Christina Hood
Compass Climate, Paekakariki, New Zealand.

Notes

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS Log in

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media

(0)eLetters

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.