Advertisement

Livestock antibiotic resistance

Most antibiotic use is for livestock, and it is growing with the increase in global demand for meat. It is unclear what the increase in demand for antibiotics means for the occurrence of drug resistance in animals and risk to humans. Van Boeckel et al. describe the global burden of antimicrobial resistance in animals on the basis of systematic reviews over the past 20 years (see the Perspective by Moore). There is a clear increase in the number of resistant bacterial strains occurring in chickens and pigs. The current study provides a much-needed baseline model for low- and middle-income countries and provides a “one health” perspective to which future data can be added.
Science, this issue p. eaaw1944; see also p. 1251

Structured Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The global scale-up in demand for animal protein is the most notable dietary trend of our time. Since 2000, meat production has plateaued in high-income countries but has grown by 68%, 64%, and 40% in Asia, Africa, and South America, respectively. The transition to high-protein diets in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been facilitated by the global expansion of intensive animal production systems in which antimicrobials are used routinely to maintain health and productivity. Globally, 73% of all antimicrobials sold on Earth are used in animals raised for food. A growing body of evidence has linked this practice with the rise of antimicrobial-resistant infections, not just in animals but also in humans. Beyond potentially serious consequences for public health, the reliance on antimicrobials to meet demand for animal protein is a likely threat to the sustainability of the livestock industry, and thus to the livelihood of farmers around the world.

RATIONALE

In LMICs, trends in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in animals are poorly documented. In the absence of systematic surveillance systems, point prevalence surveys represent a largely untapped source of information to map trends in AMR in animals. We use geospatial models to produce global maps of AMR in LMICs and give policy-makers—or a future international panel—a baseline for monitoring AMR levels in animals and target interventions in the regions most affected by the rise of resistance.

RESULTS

We identified 901 point prevalence surveys from LMICs reporting AMR rates in animals for common indicator pathogens: Escherichia coli, Campylobacter spp., nontyphoidal Salmonella spp., and Staphylococcus aureus. From 2000 to 2018, the proportion of antimicrobial compounds with resistance higher than 50% (P50) increased from 0.15 to 0.41 in chickens and from 0.13 to 0.34 in pigs and plateaued between 0.12 and 0.23 in cattle. Global maps of AMR (available at resistancebank.org) show hotspots of resistance in northeastern India, northeastern China, northern Pakistan, Iran, eastern Turkey, the south coast of Brazil, Egypt, the Red River delta in Vietnam, and the areas surrounding Mexico City and Johannesburg. Areas where resistance is just starting to emerge are Kenya, Morocco, Uruguay, southern Brazil, central India, and southern China. Uncertainty in our predictions was greatest in the Andes, the Amazon region, West and Central Africa, the Tibetan plateau, Myanmar, and Indonesia. Dense geographical coverage of point prevalence surveys did not systematically correlate with the presence of hotspots of AMR, such as in Ethiopia, Thailand, Chhattisgarh (India), and Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil). The highest resistance rates were observed with the most commonly used classes of antimicrobials in animal production: tetracyclines, sulfonamides, and penicillins.

CONCLUSION

The portfolio of antimicrobials used to raise animals for food is rapidly getting depleted, with important consequences for animal health, farmers’ livelihoods, and potentially for human health. Regions affected by the highest levels of AMR should take immediate actions to preserve the efficacy of antimicrobials that are essential in human medicine by restricting their use in animal production. In some middle-income countries, particularly in South America, surveillance must be scaled up to match that of low-income African countries that are currently outperforming them despite more limited resources. Policy-makers coordinating the international response to AMR may consider sparing African countries from the most aggressive measures to restrict access to veterinary drugs, which may undermine livestock-based economic development and rightfully be perceived as unfair. However, in regions where resistance is starting to emerge, there is a window of opportunity to limit the rise of resistance by encouraging a transition to sustainable animal farming practices. High-income countries, where antimicrobials have been used on farms since the 1950s, should support this transition—for example, through a global fund to subsidize improvement in farm-level biosafety and biosecurity.
Animals raised for food use the majority of antimicrobials sold on Earth.
The main article presents a map of antimicrobial resistance in animals in low- and middle-income countries where sales of veterinary antimicrobials remain largely unregulated. In this image, broilers are seen roaming freely outside of a family-owned farm in Kitwe, Zambia. [Photo: S. Jetha]

Abstract

The global scale-up in demand for animal protein is the most notable dietary trend of our time. Antimicrobial consumption in animals is threefold that of humans and has enabled large-scale animal protein production. The consequences for the development of antimicrobial resistance in animals have received comparatively less attention than in humans. We analyzed 901 point prevalence surveys of pathogens in developing countries to map resistance in animals. China and India represented the largest hotspots of resistance, with new hotspots emerging in Brazil and Kenya. From 2000 to 2018, the proportion of antimicrobials showing resistance above 50% increased from 0.15 to 0.41 in chickens and from 0.13 to 0.34 in pigs. Escalating resistance in animals is anticipated to have important consequences for animal health and, eventually, for human health.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S12
Tables S1 to S6
References (3854)

Resources

File (aaw1944-van-boeckel-sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
T. P. Van Boeckel, E. E. Glennon, D. Chen, M. Gilbert, T. P. Robinson, B. T. Grenfell, S. A. Levin, S. Bonhoeffer, R. Laxminarayan, Reducing antimicrobial use in food animals. Science 357, 1350–1352 (2017).
2
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2017); http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home.
3
E. K. Silbergeld, J. Graham, L. B. Price, Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 29, 151–169 (2008).
4
M. J. Ward, C. L. Gibbons, P. R. McAdam, B. A. D. van Bunnik, E. K. Girvan, G. F. Edwards, J. R. Fitzgerald, M. E. J. Woolhouse, Time-scaled evolutionary analysis of the transmission and antibiotic resistance dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 7275–7282 (2014).
5
S. P. W. de Vries, M. Vurayai, M. Holmes, S. Gupta, M. Bateman, D. Goldfarb, D. J. Maskell, M. I. Matsheka, A. J. Grant, Phylogenetic analyses and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Campylobacter spp. from diarrhoeal patients and chickens in Botswana. PLOS ONE 13, e0194481 (2018).
6
Y.-Y. Liu, Y. Wang, T. R. Walsh, L.-X. Yi, R. Zhang, J. Spencer, Y. Doi, G. Tian, B. Dong, X. Huang, L.-F. Yu, D. Gu, H. Ren, X. Chen, L. Lv, D. He, H. Zhou, Z. Liang, J.-H. Liu, J. Shen, Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: A microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 161–168 (2016).
7
K. E. Jones, N. G. Patel, M. A. Levy, A. Storeygard, D. Balk, J. L. Gittleman, P. Daszak, Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451, 990–993 (2008).
8
P. Donado-Godoy, R. Castellanos, M. León, A. Arevalo, V. Clavijo, J. Bernal, D. León, M. A. Tafur, B. A. Byrne, W. A. Smith, E. Perez-Gutierrez, The establishment of the Colombian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (COIPARS): A pilot project on poultry farms, slaughterhouses and retail market. Zoonoses Public Health 62 (suppl. 1), 58–69 (2015).
9
D. F. Maron, T. J. Smith, K. E. Nachman, Restrictions on antimicrobial use in food animal production: An international regulatory and economic survey. Global. Health 9, 48 (2013).
10
D. Grace, Review of Evidence on Antimicrobial Resistance and Animal Agriculture in Developing Countries (2015); https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/67092.
11
K. L. Tang, N. P. Caffrey, D. B. Nóbrega, S. C. Cork, P. E. Ronksley, H. W. Barkema, A. J. Polachek, H. Ganshorn, N. Sharma, J. D. Kellner, W. A. Ghali, Restricting the use of antibiotics in food-producing animals and its associations with antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals and human beings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Planet. Health 1, e316–e327 (2017).
12
World Health Organization, WHO Guidelines on Use of Medically Important Antimicrobials in Food-Producing Animals (2017); https://www.who.int/foodsafety/areas_work/antimicrobial-resistance/cia_guidelines/en/.
13
World Health Organization, Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System: Manual for early implementation (2015); http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/m/abstract/Js22228en/.
14
European Food Safety Authority, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, The European Union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2016. EFSA J. 16, e05182 (2018).
15
World Health Organization, Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Foodborne Bacteria: Application of a One Health Approach (2017); https://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/agisar_guidance2017/en/.
16
N. Golding, R. Burstein, J. Longbottom, A. J. Browne, N. Fullman, A. Osgood-Zimmerman, L. Earl, S. Bhatt, E. Cameron, D. C. Casey, L. Dwyer-Lindgren, T. H. Farag, A. D. Flaxman, M. S. Fraser, P. W. Gething, H. S. Gibson, N. Graetz, L. K. Krause, X. R. Kulikoff, S. S. Lim, B. Mappin, C. Morozoff, R. C. Reiner Jr.., A. Sligar, D. L. Smith, H. Wang, D. J. Weiss, C. J. L. Murray, C. L. Moyes, S. I. Hay, Mapping under-5 and neonatal mortality in Africa, 2000-15: A baseline analysis for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet 390, 2171–2182 (2017).
17
M. Woolhouse, J. Farrar, Policy: An intergovernmental panel on antimicrobial resistance. Nature 509, 555–557 (2014).
18
World Health Organization, Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine, 5th Revision; https://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/antimicrobials-fifth/en/).
19
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, The National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System: NARMS Integrated Report, 2015 (2017); https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/SafetyHealth/AntimicrobialResistance/NationalAntimicrobialResistanceMonitoringSystem/ucm416741.htm.
20
J. Y. Madec, M. Haenni, P. Nordmann, L. Poirel, Extended-spectrum β-lactamase/AmpC- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in animals: A threat for humans? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 23, 826–833 (2017).
21
H. Steinfeld, P. Gerber, T. Wassenaar, V. Castel, M. Rosales, C. de Haan, Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options (2006); https://www.globalmethane.org/expo-docs/china07/postexpo/ag_gerber.pdf.
22
B. Bengtsson, C. Greko, Antibiotic resistance—Consequences for animal health, welfare, and food production. Ups. J. Med. Sci. 119, 96–102 (2014).
23
E. Y. Klein, T. P. Van Boeckel, E. M. Martinez, S. Pant, S. Gandra, S. A. Levin, H. Goossens, R. Laxminarayan, Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, E3463–E3470 (2018).
24
P. Collignon, J. J. Beggs, T. R. Walsh, S. Gandra, R. Laxminarayan, Anthropological and socioeconomic factors contributing to global antimicrobial resistance: A univariate and multivariable analysis. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e398–e405 (2018).
25
E. Y. Klein, M. Makowsky, M. Orlando, E. Hatna, N. P. Braykov, R. Laxminarayan, Influence of provider and urgent care density across different socioeconomic strata on outpatient antibiotic prescribing in the USA. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 70, 1580–1587 (2015).
26
D. J. Weiss, A. Nelson, H. S. Gibson, W. Temperley, S. Peedell, A. Lieber, M. Hancher, E. Poyart, S. Belchior, N. Fullman, B. Mappin, U. Dalrymple, J. Rozier, T. C. D. Lucas, R. E. Howes, L. S. Tusting, S. Y. Kang, E. Cameron, D. Bisanzio, K. E. Battle, S. Bhatt, P. W. Gething, A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature 553, 333–336 (2018).
27
C. García-Rey, A. Fenoll, L. Aguilar, J. Casal, Effect of social and climatological factors on antimicrobial use and Streptococcus pneumoniae resistance in different provinces in Spain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 54, 465–471 (2004).
28
A. Diana, E. G. Manzanilla, J. A. Calderón Díaz, F. C. Leonard, L. A. Boyle, Do weaner pigs need in-feed antibiotics to ensure good health and welfare? PLOS ONE 12, e0185622 (2017).
29
N. T. Nhung, N. Chansiripornchai, J. J. Carrique-Mas, Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Poultry Pathogens: A Review. Front. Vet. Sci. 4, 126 (2017).
30
P. Asadollahi, N. N. Farahani, M. Mirzaii, S. S. Khoramrooz, A. van Belkum, K. Asadollahi, M. Dadashi, D. Darban-Sarokhalil, Distribution of the Most Prevalent Spa Types among Clinical Isolates of Methicillin-Resistant and -Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus around the World: A Review. Front. Microbiol. 9, 163 (2018).
31
T. R. Walsh, Y. Wu, China bans colistin as a feed additive for animals. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 1102–1103 (2016).
32
European Medicines Agency, European Public MRL Assessment Report (EPMAR): Gentamicin (All Mammalian Food Producing Species and Fin Fish) (2016); www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/mrl-report/gentamicin-all-mammalian-food-producing-species-fin-fish-european-public-maximum-residue-limit_en.pdf.
33
D. Muloi, M. J. Ward, A. B. Pedersen, E. M. Fèvre, M. E. J. Woolhouse, B. A. D. van Bunnik, Are food animals responsible for transfer of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli or their resistance determinants to human populations? A systematic review. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 15, 467–474 (2018).
34
S. I. Hay, C. A. Guerra, P. W. Gething, A. P. Patil, A. J. Tatem, A. M. Noor, C. W. Kabaria, B. H. Manh, I. R. F. Elyazar, S. Brooker, D. L. Smith, R. A. Moyeed, R. W. Snow, A world malaria map: Plasmodium falciparum endemicity in 2007. PLOS Med. 6, e1000048 (2009).
35
A. Versporten, P. Zarb, I. Caniaux, M.-F. Gros, N. Drapier, M. Miller, V. Jarlier, D. Nathwani, H. Goossens; Global-PPS network, Antimicrobial consumption and resistance in adult hospital inpatients in 53 countries: Results of an internet-based global point prevalence survey. Lancet Glob. Health 6, e619–e629 (2018).
36
M. Mendelson, O. A. Dar, S. J. Hoffman, R. Laxminarayan, M. M. Mpundu, J.-A. Røttingen, A global antimicrobial conservation fund for low- and middle-income countries. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 51, 70–72 (2016).
37
T. P. Van Boeckel, J. Pires, R. Silvester, C. Zhao, J. Song, N. G. Criscuolo, M. Gilbert, S. Bonhoeffer, R. Laxminarayan, R code for: Global trends in antimicrobial resistance in animals in low- and middle-income countries, Zenodo (2019).
38
S. Bengtsson, C. Bjelkenbrant, G. Kahlmeter, Validation of EUCAST zone diameter breakpoints against reference broth microdilution. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, O353–O360 (2014).
39
S. Bhatt, E. Cameron, S. R. Flaxman, D. J. Weiss, D. L. Smith, P. W. Gething, Improved prediction accuracy for disease risk mapping using Gaussian process stacked generalization. J. R. Soc. Interface 14, 20170520 (2017).
40
J. Elith, J. R. Leathwick, T. Hastie, A working guide to boosted regression trees. J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 802–813 (2008).
41
R. Tibshirani, Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 58, 267–288 (1996).
42
A. Chouldechova, T. Hastie, Generalized additive model selection. arXiv:1506.03850 [stat] (17 June 2015).
43
M. Barbet‐Massin, F. Jiguet, C. H. Albert, W. Thuiller, Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: How, where and how many? Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 327–338 (2012).
44
R. J. Hijmans, Cross-validation of species distribution models: Removing spatial sorting bias and calibration with a null model. Ecology 93, 679–688 (2012).
45
A. Getis, J. K. Ord, “The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics,” in Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis (Springer, 2010), pp. 127–145.
46
World Health Organization, External Quality Assurance System (EQAS) of the WHO Global Foodborne Infections Network (2015); http://antimicrobialresistance.dk/CustomerData/Files/Folders/2-newsletter-pdf/34_21-who-eqas-2015-report-final.pdf.
47
G. Zuo, Z. Xu, B. Hao, Shigella strains are not clones of Escherichia coli but sister species in the genus Escherichia. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 11, 61–65 (2013).
48
T. P. Van Boeckel, C. Brower, M. Gilbert, B. T. Grenfell, S. A. Levin, T. P. Robinson, A. Teillant, R. Laxminarayan, Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 5649–5654 (2015).
49
S. E. Fick, R. J. Hijmans, WorldClim 2: New 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).
50
S. Siebert, P. Döll, J. Hoogeveen, J.-M. Faures, K. Frenken, S. Feick, Development and validation of the global map of irrigation areas. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 2, 1299–1327 (2005).
51
M. Gilbert, G. Conchedda, T. P. Van Boeckel, G. Cinardi, C. Linard, G. Nicolas, W. Thanapongtharm, L. D’Aietti, W. Wint, S. H. Newman, T. P. Robinson, Income disparities and the global distribution of intensively farmed chicken and pigs. PLOS ONE 10, e0133381 (2015).
52
G. Nicolas, T. P. Robinson, G. R. W. Wint, G. Conchedda, G. Cinardi, M. Gilbert, Using random forest to improve the downscaling of global livestock census data. PLOS ONE 11, e0150424 (2016).
53
M. C. Hansen, R. S. DeFries, J. R. Townshend, R. Sohlberg, Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 21, 1331–1364 (2010).
54
S. Bontemps, P. Defourny, E. Van Bogaert, O. Arino, V. Kalogirou, J. Ramos Perez, GLOBCOVER 2009: Products Description and Validation Report (2011); http://mfkp.org/INRMM/article/12770349.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 365Issue 645920 September 2019

History

Received: 29 November 2018
Revision received: 19 April 2019
Accepted: 31 July 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy, New Delhi, India.
Institute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy, New Delhi, India.
Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Institute for Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy, New Delhi, India.
Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Notes

*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
These authors contributed equally to this work.
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Funding Information

http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation:
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006734Princeton University:
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001710Society in Science:
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711Swiss National Science Foundation: PCEFP3_181248
ETH Zurich:

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Information & Authors
Published In
issue cover image
Science
Volume 365|Issue 6459
20 September 2019
Submission history
Received:29 November 2018
Accepted:31 July 2019
Published in print:20 September 2019
Metrics & Citations
Article usage
Altmetrics
Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Disinfection spreads antimicrobial resistance, Science, 371, 6528, (474-474), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.abg4380
    Abstract
  2. Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater by ionizing radiation: Removal of antibiotics, antimicrobial resistance genes and antimicrobial activity, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 415, (125724), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125724
    Crossref
  3. Policy implications for awareness gaps in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antimicrobial use among commercial Nepalese poultry producers, Global Health Research and Policy, 6, 1, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-021-00187-2
    Crossref
  4. Infection threat shapes our social instincts, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 75, 3, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-02975-9
    Crossref
  5. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of milk pathogen isolated from dairy production systems, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 194, (105451), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105451
    Crossref
  6. Distribution of genetic elements associated with antibiotic resistance in treated and untreated animal husbandry waste and wastewater, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 21, (26380-26403), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13784-y
    Crossref
  7. The role of emerging organic contaminants in the development of antimicrobial resistance, Emerging Contaminants, 7, (160-171), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2021.07.001
    Crossref
  8. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries: a scattered picture, Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 10, 1, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00931-w
    Crossref
  9. Global research activity on antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals, Archives of Public Health, 79, 1, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00572-w
    Crossref
  10. Global personalization of antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients, Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development, 6, 2, (87-93), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1080/23808993.2021.1874823
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...
Share
Share article link

Share on social media
Get Access
Log in to view the full text

AAAS Log in

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions, as well as limited access for those who register for access.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View Options
Tables
References

(0)eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.