Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: Transform global energy
Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions, as well as limited access for those who register for access.
Purchase digital access to this article
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.
No eLetters have been published for this article yet.
eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.
RE: Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: Transform global energy
IEA Key world energy statistics 2017, World TPES:
1973 = 6101 Mtoe, 2015 = 13647 Mtote, 1.0 Mtoe = 0.04187 EJt
Assume:
1973 World Energy =
(8.5 EJt/a + 4.5 EJt/a * Exp(0.0225/a * (1973 - 1800)))/0.04187 EJt/Mtoe
= 5473 Mtoe/a
2015 World Energy =
(8.5 EJt/a + 4.5 EJt/a * Exp(0.0225/a * (2015 - 1800)))/0.04187 EJt/Mtoe
= 13761 Mtoe/a
2020 World Energy =
(8.5 EJt/a + 4.5 EJt/a * Exp(0.0225/a * (2020 - 1800)))/3.6 EJt/PWh = 178 PWh/a
2050 World Energy =
(8.5 EJt/a + 4.5 EJt/a * Exp(0.0225/a * (2050 - 1800)))/3.6 EJt/PWh = 349 PWh/a
ppmCO2 = 280 preindustrial + Exp(0.0225 * (a - 1800)) --> 2020 = 421 ppm
Both global energy consumption and atmospheric CO2 seem to continue increasing 2.25%/a, as has been true since 1800.
The stated global PV yield of 1370 kWh/kWp represents a 0.156 utilization. If we assume half the energy is lost in storage and transmission, effective utilization would be 0.08. Allowing for equipment unavailability and powerplants on the wrong continents, effective utilization would be 0.06.
Solar PV nameplate in 2050 would be:
((349 PWh/a/8766 h/a)/0.06 utilization) * 1000 TW/PW
* 1 W-electric/3 W-thermal = 221 TW-nameplate-electric
Unlikely utility-scale installed cost, including land and powelines will be less than 2 USD/W, so 221 TW-nameplate PV will cost 442 Trillion USD.
All PV power will have to be able to go to storage in order to prevent much lower utilization. If we assume three days full power at 12 hours per day, each nameplate watt will have to have available 36 watt-hours storage. At 0.15 USD per watt-hour, storage cost is:
221 TW-nameplate * 36 hour storage * 0.15 USD/Wh = 1193 trillion USD.
Untested NH3-H2O storage may drop this in half, but presently is only compatible with CSP that costs more than PV. To mitigate CO2 essentially all energy sources must be replaced with zero CO2 emission power. Unlikely 2050 CO2 can be mitigated by using solar PV for less than 2000 Trillion USD. The good news is that electrolysis/fuel-cell storage will liberate D2O for atomic power plants.