Advertisement

A heavy toll

Trade in wildlife, and their parts, is well recognized for a few key species, such as elephants and rhinos, but it occurs globally, across a wide array of species. Scheffers et al. looked across tens of thousands of vertebrate species and found that one in every five species is affected by trade of some sort. The impacts of trade tend to be concentrated in certain phylogenetic groups, thus the potential for long-term impact on certain lineages is substantial. This analysis allows for prediction of potential for trade where it does not yet occur, facilitating proactive prevention.
Science, this issue p. 71

Abstract

Wildlife trade is a multibillion dollar industry that is driving species toward extinction. Of >31,500 terrestrial bird, mammal, amphibian, and squamate reptile species, ~24% (N = 7638) are traded globally. Trade is strongly phylogenetically conserved, and the hotspots of this trade are concentrated in the biologically diverse tropics. Using different assessment approaches, we predict that, owing to their phylogenetic replacement and trait similarity to currently traded species, future trade will affect up to 4064 additional species—totaling 11,702 species at risk of extinction from trade. Our assessment underscores the need for a strategic plan to combat trade with policies that are proactive rather than reactive, which is especially important because species can quickly transition from being safe to being endangered as humans continue to harvest and trade across the tree of life.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S8
Tables S1 to S10
References (3662)

Resources

File (aav5327_original_tables.zip)
File (aav5327_scheffers_sm.pdf)
File (aav5327_scheffers_sm_rev.pdf)
File (aav5327_tables10.xlsx)
File (aav5327_tables10_rev.xlsx)
File (aav5327_tables3.xlsx)
File (aav5327_tables3_rev.xlsx)
File (aav5327_tables5.xlsx)
File (aav5327_tables5_rev.xlsx)
File (aav5327_tables7.xlsx)
File (aav5327_tables7_rev.xlsx)

References and Notes

1
S. L. Pimm, C. N. Jenkins, R. Abell, T. M. Brooks, J. L. Gittleman, L. N. Joppa, P. H. Raven, C. M. Roberts, J. O. Sexton, The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344, 1246752 (2014).
2
L. Gibson, T. M. Lee, L. P. Koh, B. W. Brook, T. A. Gardner, J. Barlow, C. A. Peres, C. J. A. Bradshaw, W. F. Laurance, T. E. Lovejoy, N. S. Sodhi, Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478, 378–381 (2011).
3
S. L. Maxwell, R. A. Fuller, T. M. Brooks, J. E. M. Watson, Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature 536, 143–145 (2016).
4
V. Nijman, An overview of international wildlife trade from Southeast Asia. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 1101–1114 (2010).
5
TRAFFIC, Wildlife Trade Monitoring Network, Illegal Wildlife Trade; www.traffic.org/about-us/illegal-wildlife-trade/.
6
L. S. Wyler, P. A. Sheikh, “International illegal trade in wildlife: Threats and U.S. policy,” CRS Report for Congress (Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, 2008).
7
E. L. Bennett, Another inconvenient truth: The failure of enforcement systems to save charismatic species. Oryx 45, 476–479 (2011).
8
D. S. Wilcove, X. Giam, D. P. Edwards, B. Fisher, L. P. Koh, Navjot’s nightmare revisited: Logging, agriculture, and biodiversity in Southeast Asia. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 531–540 (2013).
9
D. Challender, T. Nguyen Van, C. Shepherd, K. Krishnasamy, A. Wang, B. Lee, E. Panjang, L. Fletcher, S. Heng, J. Seah Han Ming, A. Olsson, A. Nguyen The Truong, Q. Nguyen Van, Y. Chung, “Sunda Pangolin: Manis javanica,” The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (2014); www.iucnredlist.org/species/12763/45222303.
10
C. Beastall, C. R. Shepherd, Y. Hadiprakarsa, D. Martyr, Trade in the Helmeted Hornbill Rhinoplax vigil: The ‘ivory hornbill’. Bird Conserv. Int. 26, 137–146 (2016).
11
N. J. Collar, Helmeted Hornbills and the ivory trade: The crisis that came out of nowhere. BirdingASIA 24, 12–17 (2015).
12
S. J. O’Hanlon, A. Rieux, R. A. Farrer, G. M. Rosa, B. Waldman, A. Bataille, T. A. Kosch, K. A. Murray, B. Brankovics, M. Fumagalli, M. D. Martin, N. Wales, M. Alvarado-Rybak, K. A. Bates, L. Berger, S. Böll, L. Brookes, F. Clare, E. A. Courtois, A. A. Cunningham, T. M. Doherty-Bone, P. Ghosh, D. J. Gower, W. E. Hintz, J. Höglund, T. S. Jenkinson, C.-F. Lin, A. Laurila, A. Loyau, A. Martel, S. Meurling, C. Miaud, P. Minting, F. Pasmans, D. S. Schmeller, B. R. Schmidt, J. M. G. Shelton, L. F. Skerratt, F. Smith, C. Soto-Azat, M. Spagnoletti, G. Tessa, L. F. Toledo, A. Valenzuela-Sánchez, R. Verster, J. Vörös, R. J. Webb, C. Wierzbicki, E. Wombwell, K. R. Zamudio, D. M. Aanensen, T. Y. James, M. T. P. Gilbert, C. Weldon, J. Bosch, F. Balloux, T. W. J. Garner, M. C. Fisher, Recent Asian origin of chytrid fungi causing global amphibian declines. Science 360, 621–627 (2018).
13
R. Engeman, E. Jacobson, M. L. Avery, W. E. Meshaka Jr., The aggressive invasion of exotic reptiles in Florida with a focus on prominent species: A review. Curr. Zool. 57, 599–612 (2011).
14
BirdLife International, Data zone; http://datazone.birdlife.org/home.
16
S. A. Fritz, A. Purvis, Selectivity in mammalian extinction risk and threat types: A new measure of phylogenetic signal strength in binary traits. Conserv. Biol. 24, 1042–1051 (2010).
17
L. Santini, M. González-Suárez, C. Rondinini, M. Di Marco, Shifting baseline in macroecology? Unravelling the influence of human impact on mammalian body mass. Divers. Distrib. 23, 640–649 (2017).
18
G. Rapacciuolo, J. Marin, G. C. Costa, M. R. Helmus, J. E. Behm, T. M. Brooks, S. B. Hedges, V. C. Radeloff, B. E. Young, C. H. Graham, The signature of human pressure history on the biogeography of body mass in tetrapods. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 1022–1034 (2017).
19
D. W. Redding, C. V. DeWolff, A. Ø. Mooers, Evolutionary distinctiveness, threat status, and ecological oddity in primates. Conserv. Biol. 24, 1052–1058 (2010).
20
R. I. Vane-Wright, C. J. Humphries, P. H. Williams, What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235–254 (1991).
21
W. S. Symes, D. P. Edwards, J. Miettinen, F. E. Rheindt, L. R. Carrasco, Combined impacts of deforestation and wildlife trade on tropical biodiversity are severely underestimated. Nat. Commun. 9, 4052 (2018).
22
J. B. C. Harris, M. W. Tingley, F. Hua, D. L. Yong, J. M. Adeney, T. M. Lee, W. Marthy, D. M. Prawiradilaga, C. H. Sekercioglu, N. Suyadi, N. Winarni, D. S. Wilcove, Measuring the impact of the pet trade on Indonesian birds. Conserv. Biol. 31, 394–405 (2017).
23
A. Benítez-López, R. Alkemade, A. M. Schipper, D. J. Ingram, P. A. Verweij, J. A. J. Eikelboom, M. A. J. Huijbregts, The impact of hunting on tropical mammal and bird populations. Science 356, 180–183 (2017).
24
F. Courchamp, E. Angulo, P. Rivalan, R. J. Hall, L. Signoret, L. Bull, Y. Meinard, Rarity value and species extinction: The anthropogenic Allee effect. PLOS Biol. 4, e415 (2006).
25
M. M. Mambeya, F. Baker, B. R. Momboua, A. F. Koumba Pambo, M. Hega, V. J. Okouyi Okouyi, M. Onanga, D. W. S. Challender, D. J. Ingram, H. Wang, K. Abernethy, The emergence of a commercial trade in pangolins from Gabon. Afr. J. Ecol. 56, 601–609 (2018).
26
V. Nijman, K. A.-I. Nekaris, The Harry Potter effect: The rise in trade of owls as pets in Java and Bali, Indonesia. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 11, 84–94 (2017).
27
E. G. Frank, D. S. Wilcove, Long delays in banning trade in threatened species. Science 363, 686–688 (2019).
28
J. R. Harrison, D. L. Roberts, J. Hernandez-Castro, Assessing the extent and nature of wildlife trade on the dark web. Conserv. Biol. 30, 900–904 (2016).
29
J. Hernandez-Castro, D. L. Roberts, Automatic detection of potentially illegal online sales of elephant ivory via data mining. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 1, e10 (2015).
30
E. Di Minin, C. Fink, T. Hiippala, H. Tenkanen, A framework for investigating illegal wildlife trade on social media with machine learning. Conserv. Biol. 33, 210–213 (2019).
31
N. Hanley, O. Sheremet, M. Bozzola, D. C. MacMillan, The allure of the illegal: Choice modeling of rhino horn demand in Vietnam. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12417 (2018).
32
R. Cooney, D. Roe, H. Dublin, J. Phelps, D. Wilkie, A. Keane, H. Travers, D. Skinner, D. W. S. Challender, J. R. Allan, D. Biggs, From poachers to protectors: Engaging local communities in solutions to illegal wildlife trade. Conserv. Lett. 10, 367–374 (2017).
33
N. G. Patel, C. Rorres, D. O. Joly, J. S. Brownstein, R. Boston, M. Z. Levy, G. Smith, Quantitative methods of identifying the key nodes in the illegal wildlife trade network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 7948–7953 (2015).
34
W. S. Symes, F. L. McGrath, M. Rao, L. R. Carrasco, The gravity of wildlife trade. Biol. Conserv. 218, 268–276 (2018).
35
C. A. Peres, T. Emilio, J. Schietti, S. J. M. Desmoulière, T. Levi, Dispersal limitation induces long-term biomass collapse in overhunted Amazonian forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 892–897 (2016).
36
R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Version 3.5.2 (2018).
37
S. Chamberlain, ROpenSci, M. Salmon, rredlist: ‘IUCN’ Red List Client, R package version 0.5.0 (2018); https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rredlist..
38
M. W. Tingley, J. B. C. Harris, F. Hua, D. S. Wilcove, D. L. Yong, The pet trade’s role in defaunation. Science 356, 916 (2017).
39
U. Roll, A. Feldman, M. Novosolov, A. Allison, A. M. Bauer, R. Bernard, M. Böhm, F. Castro-Herrera, L. Chirio, B. Collen, G. R. Colli, L. Dabool, I. Das, T. M. Doan, L. L. Grismer, M. Hoogmoed, Y. Itescu, F. Kraus, M. LeBreton, A. Lewin, M. Martins, E. Maza, D. Meirte, Z. T. Nagy, C. de C Nogueira, O. S. G. Pauwels, D. Pincheira-Donoso, G. D. Powney, R. Sindaco, O. J. S. Tallowin, O. Torres-Carvajal, J. F. Trape, E. Vidan, P. Uetz, P. Wagner, Y. Wang, C. D. L. Orme, R. Grenyer, S. Meiri, The global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile conservation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1677–1682 (2017).
40
D. M. Olson, E. Dinerstein, E. D. Wikramanayake, N. D. Burgess, G. V. N. Powell, E. C. Underwood, J. A. D’amico, I. Itoua, H. E. Strand, J. C. Morrison, C. J. Loucks, T. F. Allnutt, T. H. Ricketts, Y. Kura, J. F. Lamoreux, W. W. Wettengel, P. Hedao, K. R. Kassem, Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51, 933 (2001).
41
B. G. Holt, J.-P. Lessard, M. K. Borregaard, S. A. Fritz, M. B. Araújo, D. Dimitrov, P.-H. Fabre, C. H. Graham, G. R. Graves, K. A. Jønsson, D. Nogués-Bravo, Z. Wang, R. J. Whittaker, J. Fjeldså, C. Rahbek, An update of Wallace’s zoogeographic regions of the world. Science 339, 74–78 (2013).
42
F. Osorio, R. Vallejos, F. Cuevas, D. Mancilla, SpatialPack: Tools for the assessment of the association between two spatial processes, version 0.3-8 (2019); http://spatialpack.mat.utfsm.cl.
43
W. Jetz, G. H. Thomas, J. B. Joy, K. Hartmann, A. O. Mooers, The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448 (2012).
44
T. S. Kuhn, A. Ø. Mooers, G. H. Thomas, A simple polytomy resolver for dated phylogenies. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2, 427–436 (2011).
45
O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, M. Cardillo, K. E. Jones, R. D. E. MacPhee, R. M. D. Beck, R. Grenyer, S. A. Price, R. A. Vos, J. L. Gittleman, A. Purvis, The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446, 507–512 (2007).
46
S. A. Fritz, O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, A. Purvis, Geographical variation in predictors of mammalian extinction risk: Big is bad, but only in the tropics. Ecol. Lett. 12, 538–549 (2009).
47
W. Jetz, R. A. Pyron, The interplay of past diversification and evolutionary isolation with present imperilment across the amphibian tree of life. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 850–858 (2018).
48
J. F. R. Tonini, K. H. Beard, R. B. Ferreira, W. Jetz, R. A. Pyron, Fully-sampled phylogenies of squamates reveal evolutionary patterns in threat status. Biol. Conserv. 204, 23–31 (2016).
49
K. P. Schliep, phangorn: Phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).
50
C. D. L. Orme, R. Freckleton, G. Thomas, T. Petzoldt, S. Fritz, N. Isaac, W. Pearse, caper: Comparative Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R, version 1.0.1 (2018); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caper/.
51
T. Garland, A. W. Dickerman, C. M. Janis, J. A. Jones, Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42, 265–292 (1993).
52
A. R. Ives, T. Garland Jr., ., Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. Syst. Biol. 59, 9–26 (2010).
53
N. J. B. Isaac, S. T. Turvey, B. Collen, C. Waterman, J. E. M. Baillie, Mammals on the EDGE: Conservation priorities based on threat and phylogeny. PLOS ONE 2, e296 (2007).
54
B. F. Oliveira, V. A. São-Pedro, G. Santos-Barrera, C. Penone, G. C. Costa, AmphiBIO, a global database for amphibian ecological traits. Sci. Data 4, 170123 (2017).
55
A. Slavenko, O. J. S. Tallowin, Y. Itescu, P. Raia, S. Meiri, Late Quaternary reptile extinctions: Size matters, insularity dominates. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 1308–1320 (2016).
56
D. J. Stekhoven, P. Bühlmann, MissForest—Non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics 28, 112–118 (2012).
57
J. A. F. Diniz-Filho, L. M. Bini, T. F. Rangel, I. Morales-Castilla, M. Á. Olalla-Tárraga, M. Á. Rodríguez, B. A. Hawkins, On the selection of phylogenetic eigenvectors for ecological analyses. Ecography 35, 239–249 (2012).
58
T. Santos, PVR: Phylogenetic Eigenvectors Regression and Phylogentic Signal-Representation Curve, R package version 0.3 (2018); https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/PVR/index.html.
59
H. Wilman, J. Belmaker, J. Simpson, C. de la Rosa, M. M. Rivadeneira, W. Jetz, EltonTraits 1.0: Species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95, 2027–2027 (2014).
60
D. W. Redding, A. O. Mooers, Incorporating evolutionary measures into conservation prioritization. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1670–1678 (2006).
61
S. W. Kembel, P. D. Cowan, M. R. Helmus, W. K. Cornwell, H. Morlon, D. D. Ackerly, S. P. Blomberg, C. O. Webb, Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463–1464 (2010).
62
P. Dutilleul, P. Clifford, S. Richardson, D. Hemon, Modifying the t test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 49, 305 (1993).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 366 | Issue 6461
4 October 2019

Submission history

Received: 25 September 2018
Accepted: 4 September 2019
Published in print: 4 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We dedicate this paper to all researchers and park guards who have lost their lives in protecting wildlife from illegal trade. Funding: B.R.S. received financial support from the UF/IFAS Early Career Seed Grant. Author contributions: B.R.S., B.F.O., and D.P.E. conceptualized the idea and methodology, I.L. and B.F.O. collected data, B.F.O. analyzed data, B.R.S. and D.P.E. wrote the original draft, and all authors revised the work. Competing interests: None declared. Data and materials availability: All data related to this work are provided in the supplementary materials.

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University at Montgomery, Montgomery, AL 36124, USA.
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.

Notes

*
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] (B.R.S.); [email protected] (D.P.E.)

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Admirable Redbelly Toad: The Amphibian That Defied a Hydropower Plant, Imperiled: The Encyclopedia of Conservation, (597-608), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821139-7.00100-8
    Crossref
  2. The costs and benefits of primary prevention of zoonotic pandemics, Science Advances, 8, 5, (2022)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.abl4183
    Abstract
  3. What are TCM doctors’ attitudes towards replacing animal-origin medicinal materials with plant-origin alternatives?, Global Ecology and Conservation, 34, (e02045), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02045
    Crossref
  4. Wildlife trade targets colorful birds and threatens the aesthetic value of nature, Current Biology, 32, 19, (4299-4305.e4), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.066
    Crossref
  5. Genomic analyses show extremely perilous conservation status of African and Asiatic cheetahs ( Acinonyx jubatus ) , Molecular Ecology, 31, 16, (4208-4223), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16577
    Crossref
  6. Economic incentives for the wildlife trade and costs of epidemics compared across individual, national, and global scales, Conservation Science and Practice, 4, 7, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12735
    Crossref
  7. Unraveling the mystery of confiscated “jackal horns” in India using wildlife forensic tools, International Journal of Legal Medicine, 136, 6, (1767-1771), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02773-6
    Crossref
  8. Recovering trace reptile DNA from the illegal wildlife trade, Forensic Science International: Animals and Environments, 2, (100040), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiae.2021.100040
    Crossref
  9. Wildlife Trade, Reference Module in Life Sciences, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822562-2.00004-9
    Crossref
  10. Frog in the well: A review of the scientific literature for evidence of amphibian sentience, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 247, (105559), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105559
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media