Advertisement
Perspective
Climate

Shifting summer rains

Science2 Nov 2018Vol 362, Issue 6414pp. 518-520DOI: 10.1126/science.aav5280

Abstract

Most of China's water supply depends on rainfall from the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM), a seasonal progression of rains that begins along the southern coast in spring, then sweeps north, reaching northeastern China in midsummer (see the photo). Projections of the EASM's response to future climate change are complicated by its complex interaction with the mid-latitude jet stream, which appears to govern the monsoon's northward march each spring and summer (1). To investigate the monsoon's sensitivity and dynamics, many scientists have turned to examining its past changes recorded in natural archives. Although past climates are not a direct analog of the 21st-century climate, they offer vital tests of the ability to describe monsoon behavior through theories and numerical models. On page 580 of this issue, Zhang et al. (2) provide new insight into the impact of past EASM and jet stream variations on rainfall patterns over China. Through examination of trace elements in Chinese stalagmites (a proxy for local precipitation amount) and climate modeling experiments, they show that cooling episodes in the North Atlantic shifted the summer jet stream south, delaying the onset of monsoon rains in northeastern China and increasing rainfall in central China. The finding demonstrates that local rainfall in the EASM regions can vary in opposition to monsoon strength, and it highlights the importance of future high-latitude warming in determining precipitation patterns in China.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

References and Notes

1
J. C. H. Chiang et al., Quat. Sci. Rev. 108, 111 (2015).
2
H. Zhang et al., Science 362, 580 (2018).
3
H. Cheng et al., Nature 534, 640 (2016).
4
Y. J. Wang et al., Science 294, 2345 (2001).
5
F. S. R. Pausata et al., Nat. Geosci. 4, 474 (2011).
6
Y. Goldsmith et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 1817 (2017).
7
J. C. H. Chiang et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 3788 (2017).
8
J. W. Beck et al., Science 360, 877 (2018).
9
S. C. Clemens et al., Nat. Commun. 9, 3364 (2018).
10
R. A. Owen et al., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 443, 129 (2016).
11
B. E. Wortham et al., Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 463, 310 (2017).
12
Z. Liu et al., Quat. Sci. Rev. 83, 115 (2014).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 362 | Issue 6414
2 November 2018

Submission history

Published in print: 2 November 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

I thank G. Roe for helpful discussion and acknowledge funding related to this topic from NSF EAR-1434138.

Authors

Affiliations

David McGee
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Notes

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media