Skip to main content
Advertisement
Main content starts here

Mapping global deforestation patterns

Forest loss is being driven by various factors, including commodity production, forestry, agriculture, wildfire, and urbanization. Curtis et al. used high-resolution Google Earth imagery to map and classify global forest loss since 2001. Just over a quarter of global forest loss is due to deforestation through permanent land use change for the production of commodities, including beef, soy, palm oil, and wood fiber. Despite regional differences and efforts by governments, conservationists, and corporations to stem the losses, the overall rate of commodity-driven deforestation has not declined since 2001.
Science, this issue p. 1108

Abstract

Global maps of forest loss depict the scale and magnitude of forest disturbance, yet companies, governments, and nongovernmental organizations need to distinguish permanent conversion (i.e., deforestation) from temporary loss from forestry or wildfire. Using satellite imagery, we developed a forest loss classification model to determine a spatial attribution of forest disturbance to the dominant drivers of land cover and land use change over the period 2001 to 2015. Our results indicate that 27% of global forest loss can be attributed to deforestation through permanent land use change for commodity production. The remaining areas maintained the same land use over 15 years; in those areas, loss was attributed to forestry (26%), shifting agriculture (24%), and wildfire (23%). Despite corporate commitments, the rate of commodity-driven deforestation has not declined. To end deforestation, companies must eliminate 5 million hectares of conversion from supply chains each year.

Register and access this article for free

As a service to the community, this article is available for free.

Access the full article

View all access options to continue reading this article.

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S10
Tables S1 to S7
Data S1 to S4
References (1730)

Resources

File (aau3445-data-s1.txt)
File (aau3445-data-s2.docx)
File (aau3445-data-s3.tif)
File (aau3445-data-s4.docx)
File (aau3445_curtis_sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
S. Donofrio, P. Rothrock, J. Leonard, “Supply Change: Tracking Corporate Commitments to Deforestation-Free Supply Chains” (Forest Trends, 2017); www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_5521.pdf#.
3
M. C. Hansen, P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, J. R. G. Townshend, High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
5
D. Schoene, W. Killmann, H. von Lüpke, M. L. Wilkie, “Definitional Issues Related to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries” (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2007); www.fao.org/tempref/docrep/fao/009/j9345e/j9345e00.pdf.
6
N. Harris, R. Petersen, C. Davis, O. Payne, “Global Forest Watch and the Forest Resources Assessment, Explained in 5 Graphics” (World Resources Institute, 2016); www.wri.org/blog/2016/08/insider-global-forest-watch-and-forest-resources-assessment-explained-5-graphics.
7
R. S. DeFries, R. A. Houghton, M. C. Hansen, C. B. Field, D. Skole, J. Townshend, Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 1990s. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 14256–14261 (2002).
8
M. C. Hansen, S. V. Stehman, P. V. Potapov, Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 8650–8655 (2010).
9
See supplementary materials.
10
H. J. Geist, E. F. Lambin, Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation. Bioscience 52, 143–150 (2002).
11
G. Molinario, M. C. Hansen, P. V. Potapov, Forest cover dynamics of shifting cultivation in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A remote sensing-based assessment for 2000–2010. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 094009 (2015).
12
R. Tropek, O. Sedláček, J. Beck, P. Keil, Z. Musilová, I. Símová, D. Storch, Comment on “High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change”. Science 344, 981 (2014).
13
P. Olofsson, G. M. Foody, M. Herold, S. V. Stehman, C. E. Woodcock, M. A. Wulder, Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sens. Environ. 148, 42–57 (2014).
14
A. Tyukavina, A. Baccini, M. C. Hansen, P. V. Potapov, S. V. Stehman, R. A. Houghton, A. M. Krylov, S. Turubanova, S. J. Goetz, Aboveground carbon loss in natural and managed tropical forests from 2000 to 2012. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 074002 (2015).
15
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, “Warsaw Framework for REDD-Plus” (2013); http://unfccc.int/land_use_and_climate_change/redd/items/8180.php.
16
Huffington Post Canada, “Canada Largest Contributor to Deforestation Worldwide” (2014); www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/09/05/canada-deforestation-wost-in-world_n_5773142.html.
17
FAO Country Profiles: Geographic and Economic Groups (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2017); www.fao.org/countryprofiles/geographic-and-economic-groups/en/.
18
T. M. Therneau, B. Atkinson, B. Ripley, R Package ‘rpart’ version 4.1-13 (2018); http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rpart/rpart.pdf.
20
M. N. Tuanmu, W. Jetz, A global 1-km consensus land-cover product for biodiversity and ecosystem modeling. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 1031–1045 (2014).
21
Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Documentation for the Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4), Revision 10 Data Sets (NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center, 2017); https://doi.org/10.7927/H4PG1PPM.
22
W. G. Cochran, in Sampling Techniques (Wiley, ed. 3, 1977), pp. 150–188.
23
I. D. Thompson, M. R. Guariguata, K. Okabe, C. Bahamondez, R. Nasi, V. Heymell, C. Sabogal, An operational framework for defining and monitoring forest degradation. Ecol. Soc. 18, 20 (2013).
24
M. Parisien, C. Miller, S. A. Parks, E. R. DeLancey, F. Robinne, M. D. Flannigan, The spatially varying influence of humans on fire probability in North America. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 075005 (2016).
25
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2017); www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/past-assessments/fra-2015/en/.
26
“Progress on the New York Declaration on Forests – An Assessment Framework and Initial Report: Technical Annexes. Goal 1: At least halve the rate of loss of natural forests globally by 2020 and strive to end natural forest loss by 2030.” Prepared by Climate Focus, in collaboration with Environmental Defense Fund, Forest Trends, Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves, Global Canopy Program and The Sustainability Consortium (2015); http://forestdeclaration.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/FD-Goal_1-Draft-17-12-15.pdf.
27
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, “Report on the Conference of the Parties on Its Seventh Session” (2002); https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/cop7/13a01.pdf.
28
D. Schoene, W. Killmann, H. von Lüpke, M. L. Wilkie, “Definitional Issues Related to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries” (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2007); www.fao.org/docrep/009/j9345e/j9345e00.htm…/fao/009/j9345e/j9345e00.pdf.
29
G. Molinario, M. C. Hansen, P. V. Potapov, Forest cover dynamics of shifting cultivation in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A remote sensing-base assessment for 2000-2010. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 094009 (2015).
30
A. Grainger, Difficulties in tracking the long-term global trend in tropical forest area. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 818–823 (2008).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Neither embedded figures nor equations with special characters can be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures and equations within eLetters in general. If a figure or equation is essential, please include within the text of the eLetter a link to the figure, equation, or full text with special characters at a public repository with versioning, such as Zenodo. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

ScienceAdviser

Get Science’s award-winning newsletter with the latest news, commentary, and research, free to your inbox daily.