Advertisement

A volcanic end to an earthquake

The dangerous and active Aso volcanic cluster appears to have put an early end to the damaging magnitude 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake that struck Japan in April 2016. Lin et al. found that the fault rupture stopped underneath the Aso caldera. The unzipping of the fault ended where the rocks went from cold and brittle to a more liquid-like magmatic mush. This distinctive example shows how abrupt changes in rock properties can terminate fault rupture and cap the size of an earthquake.
Science, this issue p. 869

Abstract

Field investigations and seismic data show that the 16 April 2016 moment magnitude (Mw) 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake produced a ~40-kilometer-long surface rupture zone along the northeast-southwest–striking Hinagu-Futagawa strike-slip fault zone and newly identified faults on the western side of Aso caldera, Kyushu Island, Japan. The coseismic surface ruptures cut Aso caldera, including two volcanic cones inside it, but terminate therein. The data show that northeastward propagation of coseismic rupturing terminated in Aso caldera because of the presence of magma beneath the Aso volcanic cluster. The seismogenic faults of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake may require reassessment of the volcanic hazard in the vicinity of Aso volcano.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

Summary

Figs. S1 to S6

Resources

File (aah4629-lin-sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Hill D. P., Pollitz F., Newhall C., Earthquake-volcano interactions. Phys. Today 55, 41–47 (2002).
2
Eggert S., Walter T. R., Volcanic activity before and after large tectonic earthquakes: Observations and statistical significance. Tectonophysics 471, 14–26 (2009).
3
Delle Donne D., Harris A. J. L., Ripepe M., Wright R., Earthquake-induced thermal anomalies at active volcanoes. Geology 38, 771–774 (2010).
4
C. G. Newhall, R. S. Punongbayan, Eds., FIRE and MUD: Eruptions and Lahars of Mount Pinatubo, Philippines (Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Univ. of Washington Press, 1996).
5
Walter T. R., Wang R., Zimmer M., Grosser H., Lühr B., Ratdomopurbo A., Volcanic activity influenced tectonic earthquakes: Static and dynamic stress triggering at Mt. Merapi. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L05304 (2007).
6
Prejean S., Ellsworth W., Zoback M., Waldhauser F., Fault structure and kinematics of the Long Valley Caldera region, California, revealed by high-accuracy earthquake hypocenters and focal mechanism stress inversions. J. Geophys. Res. 107, ESE 9-1 (2002).
7
King G., Nabecaronlek J., Role of fault bends in the initiation and termination of earthquake rupture. Science 228, 984–987 (1985).
8
Duan B., Oglesby D. D., Heterogeneous fault stresses from previous earthquakes and the effect on the dynamics of parallel strike-slip faults. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B05309 (2006).
9
Hilley G. E., Arrowsmith J. R., Stone E., Inferring segment strength contrasts and boundaries along low-friction fault using surface offset data, with an example from the Cholame-Carrizo segment boundary along the San Andreas Fault, Southern California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91, 427–440 (2001).
10
Yagi Y., Okuwaki R., Enescu B., Kasahara A., Miyakawa A., Otsubo M., Rupture process of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in relation to the thermal structure around Aso volcano. Earth Planets Space 68, 118 (2016).
11
Aki K., Asperity, barriers, characteristic earthquakes and strong motion prediction. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 5867–5872 (1984).
12
Brodsky E. E., Sturtevant B., Kanamori H., Earthquakes, volcanoes, and rectified diffusion. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 23827–23838 (1998).
13
Japan Meteorological Agency, “Report on the Heisei 28 (2016) Kumamoto earthquake (no. 10),” 2016; www.jma.go.jp/jma/press/1604/16g/201604161530.html [in Japanese].
14
Disaster Information Laboratory, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, “Report on the Heisei 28 (2016) Kumamoto earthquake (no. 21),” 2016; http://ecom-plat.jp/nied-cr/index.php?gid=10153 [in Japanese].
15
K. Koketsu, H. Kobayashi, H. Miyake, “Generation process of the 14th and 16th April 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes,” 2016; http://taro.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/saigai/2016kumamoto/index.html#C [in Japanese].
16
Research Group for Active Faults of Japan, Active Faults in Japan—Sheet Maps and Inventories (Univ. of Tokyo Press, revised ed., 1991).
17
Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion, “Evaluation of Heisei 28 (2016) Kumamoto earthquake,” 2016; www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/science/detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2016/04/15/1285728_001_1.pdf [in Japanese].
18
Lin A., Uda S., Morphological characteristics of the earthquake surface ruptures on Awaji Island, associated with the 1995 Southern Hyogo Prefecture Earthquake. Isl. Arc 5, 1–15 (1996).
19
Lin A., Fu B., Guo J., Zeng Q., Dang G., He W., Zhao Y., Co-seismic strike-slip and rupture length produced by the 2001 Ms 8.1 Central Kunlun earthquake. Science 296, 2015–2017 (2002).
20
Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, “Information concerning with the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake,” 2016; www.gsi.go.jp/BOUSAI/H27-kumamoto-earthquake-index.html [in Japanese].
21
National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, “16 April 2016 Kumamoto earthquake and its aftershock distribution,” 2016; www.jishin.go.jp/main/chousa/13apr_awaji/p03.htm [in Japanese].
22
Sudo Y., Seismic activities at the western region of the Aso caldera. Bull. Volcanol. Soc. Jpn. 33, 130–134 (1988).
23
Sudo Y., An attenuation structure beneath the Aso Caldera determined from the propagation of seismic waves. Bull. Volcanol. 53, 99–111 (1991).
24
Sudo Y., Kong L., Three dimensional seismic velocity structure beneath Aso volcano, Kyushu, Japan. Bull. Volcanol. 63, 326–344 (2001).
25
Okubo Y., Tsu H., Ogawa K., Estimation of Curie point temperature and geothermal structure of island arcs of Japan. Tectonophysics 159, 279–290 (1989).
26
Tsutsui T., Sudo Y., Seismic reflectors beneath the central cones of Aso Volcano Kyushu, Japan. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 131, 33–58 (2004).
27
Unglert K., Savage M. K., Fournier N., Ohkura T., Abe Y., Shear wave splitting, vP/vS, and GPS during a time of enhanced activity at Aso caldera, Kyushu. J. Geophys. Res. 116, B11203 (2011).
28
Abe Y., Ohkura T., Shibutani T., Hirahara K., Kato M., Crustal structure beneath Aso Caldera, Southwest Japan, as derived from receiver function analysis. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 195, 1–12 (2010).
29
Okubo Y., Shibuya A., Thermal and crustal structure of the Aso volcano and surrounding regions constrained by gravity and magnetic data, Japan. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 55, 337–350 (1993).
30
Takekawa J., Mikada H., Goto T., Effect of heterogeneities on evaluating earthquake triggering of volcanic eruptions. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 13, 231–237 (2013).
31
Tajima F., Kanamori H., Aftershock area expansion and mechanical heterogeneity of fault zone within subduction zones. Geophys. Res. Lett. 12, 345–348 (1985).
32
Kanamori H., Rupture process of subduction-zone earthquakes. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 14, 293–322 (1986).
33
Simons M., Minson S. E., Sladen A., Ortega F., Jiang J., Owen S. E., Meng L., Ampuero J. P., Wei S., Chu R., Helmberger D. V., Kanamori H., Hetland E., Moore A. W., Webb F. H., The 2011 magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake: Mosaicking the megathrust from seconds to centuries. Science 332, 1421–1425 (2011).
34
Zhao D., Huang Z., Umino U., Hasegawa A., Kanamori H., Structural heterogeneity in the megathrust zone and mechanism of the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake (Mw 9.0). Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L17308 (2011).
35
Tajima F., Kennett B. L. N., Interlocking of heterogeneous plate coupling and aftershock area expansion pattern for the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Mw 9.0 earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L05307 (2012).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 354 | Issue 6314
18 November 2016

Article versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

Submission history

Received: 30 June 2016
Accepted: 7 October 2016
Published in print: 18 November 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank K. Sado, S. Takahashi, S. Hirata, and K. Osono for assistance in the field; M. Miyawaki for discussions during this study; and B. Di and N. Akiyama for help in arranging the field work and processing the images. We acknowledge the Disaster Information Laboratory (DIL), National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience for kindly providing seismic data. The raw data for focal mechanisms, foreshocks, and aftershocks are available directly from DIL. This work was partially supported by a Science Project (no. 15K01248) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

Authors

Affiliations

A. Lin*
Department of Geophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
T. Satsukawa
Department of Geophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
M. Wang
Department of Geophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
Z. Mohammadi Asl
Department of Geophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
R. Fueta
Department of Geophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
F. Nakajima
CTI Engineering International, Kotou-ku, Tokyo 136-0071, Japan.

Notes

*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. A self-similar dynamic rupture model based on the simplified wave-rupture analogy, Geophysical Journal International, 225, 3, (1586-1604), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab045
    Crossref
  2. Volcanoes Along Convergent Plate Boundaries, Volcano-Tectonic Processes, (449-493), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65968-4_12
    Crossref
  3. Defining the Coseismic Phase of the Crustal Deformation Cycle With Seismogeodesy, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126, 10, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022002
    Crossref
  4. Retraction, Science, 364, 6439, (444-444), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aax6803
    Abstract
  5. The 2016 Mw 5.9 Menyuan Earthquake in the Qilian Orogen, China: A Potentially Delayed Depth-Segmented Rupture Following from the 1986 Mw 6.0 Menyuan Earthquake, Seismological Research Letters, 91, 2A, (758-769), (2020).https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190168
    Crossref
  6. Surface ruptures database related to the 26 December 2018, MW 4.9 Mt. Etna earthquake, southern Italy, Scientific Data, 7, 1, (2020).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0383-0
    Crossref
  7. Resolving rupture processes of great earthquakes: Reviews and perspective from fast response to joint inversion, Science China Earth Sciences, 63, 4, (492-511), (2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-019-9549-1
    Crossref
  8. Fusion of GPS and InSAR data to derive robust 3D deformation maps based on MRF L1-regularization, Remote Sensing Letters, 11, 2, (204-213), (2019).https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2019.1701722
    Crossref
  9. Crustal Extension and Graben Formation by Fault Slip‐Associated Pore Opening, Kyushu, Japan, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124, 5, (4879-4894), (2019).https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016649
    Crossref
  10. Diastereo‐ and Enantioselective Access to Stereotriads through a Flexible Coupling of Substituted Aldehydes and Alkenes, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 58, 18, (5887-5890), (2019).https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201900801
    Crossref
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media