Social norms as solutions
Abstract
Access the full article
View all access options to continue reading this article.
Supplementary Material
- Download
- 121.95 KB
References and Notes
(0)eLetters
eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Neither embedded figures nor equations with special characters can be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures and equations within eLetters in general. If a figure or equation is essential, please include within the text of the eLetter a link to the figure, equation, or full text with special characters at a public repository with versioning, such as Zenodo. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.
Log In to Submit a ResponseNo eLetters have been published for this article yet.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In

7 October 2016
Copyright
Submission history
Acknowledgments
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
- 557 citation in Crossref
- 513 citation in Web of Science
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite as
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Cited by
- Food choice with increased visibility – A field experiment at an environmental economics conference, Ecological Economics, 240, (108816), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108816
- A novel personal carbon scheme for public engagement in climate actions, Information Geography, 1, 2, (100022), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infgeo.2025.100022
- Hope as an enabler of climate change adaptation, Communications Psychology, 3, 1, (2025).https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00291-w
- Pricing instruments in environmental and climate policy when polluters are boundedly rational, npj Climate Action, 4, 1, (2025).https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00284-9
- Turning on the we-mode: a systematic review on joint action principles for promoting collective pro-environmental engagement, Frontiers in Psychology, 16, (2025).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1642312
- The Psychology of Ocean Literacy, Encyclopedia, 5, 4, (164), (2025).https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5040164
- The role of social perceptions on willingness-to-pay for innovations, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 114, (906-918), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.07.008
- European Climate Policy and the Global Context, Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation, (4583-4624), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84483-6_4
- How factors connected to the natural environment shape football fans’ eudaimonic and hedonic well-being, Frontiers in Psychology, 16, (2025).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1604029
- A regenerative systems framework for sustainable management of natural resources: integrating ecosystem resilience with intergenerational wellbeing, Sustainability Science, (2025).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01743-2
- See more
View Options
Log in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
More options
Purchase digital access to this article
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.







RE: "Collective Action: Social norms as solutions
The deterministic effect of the CITES and nominal impacts of social norms on global wildlife trade
IN THEIR PAPER "Collective Action: Social norms as solutions" (Oct. 7, 354: 42-43), Nyborg et al. claimed: when formal institutions like laws and treaties are not able to enforce collectively desirable outcomes in global issues; then social norms can play important roles in global issue. In the just closed 17th Conference of Parties (CoP 17) of Convention on International Trade in Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) in Johannesburg, South Africa on Oct. 4, 2016, it seemed this assertion was not true.
International trade of wild animals and wild plants threated the survival of those ones in trade, thus for preventing the wild animals and plants from extinction due to international trade, countries in the world haves been working together under the banner of CITES since 1975. Now 183 countries have ratified the CITES. Over 5,600 species of animals and 30,000 species of plants are listed in the three CITES Appendices and thus are protected by the convention against over-exploitation through international trade (www.cites.org).
The demand for wild animals and plants is driven by impetus of consumers, therefore, on the other hand, social norms have been used in the endeavor of changing people's consuming behavior, even public figures like poplar NBA basketball star, Yao Ming, movies star Li Bingbing were employed in the campaign. But little effect was seen as consumers of wild animals and plants preferred goods of wild source (1). In 2010, The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and 4 other international bodies formed an International Consortium on Combating Wildlife Crime to curb wildlife trafficking crimes (www.unodc.org/unodc/en/wildlife-and-forest-crime/).
For an example, pangolins were listed in the Appendix II of CITES, which allowed sustainable trade but the listing failed to regulated the international trade level of pangolins (2), CITES then impose a zero quota for export of pangolins, nevertheless, the consumers cannot spare the wild delicacy (3), the illegal trade now even spread to African pangolins (cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/cop/17/prop/060216/); consequently, CITES CoP 17 decided completely ban all trades of pangolins by listing all pangolins in CITES Appendix I.
In conclude, social norm have nominal effect in changing people's consuming behavior of wild animals and plants but the effect of CITES is deterministic in control illegal international trade of wild animals and plants.
Zhigang Jiang1, 2
1 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, CITES Scientific Authority of P. R. China, Beijing 100101, China; 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
E-mail: [email protected]
References
1 Liu Z, et al. 2016. PLoS One 11(3): e0145901. 10.1371/journal.pone.0145901.
2 Zhou Z, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12: 97–98.
3 Challender DWS. 2012. Asian pangolins: increasing affluence driving hunting pressure. TRAFFIC Bull 23: 92–93.