Skip to main content
Advertisement
Main content starts here

Abstract

Climate change, biodiversity loss, antibiotic resistance, and other global challenges pose major collective action problems: A group benefits from a certain action, but no individual has sufficient incentive to act alone. Formal institutions, e.g., laws and treaties, have helped address issues like ozone depletion, lead pollution, and acid rain. However, formal institutions are not always able to enforce collectively desirable outcomes. In such cases, informal institutions, such as social norms, can be important. If conditions are right, policy can support social norm changes, helping address even global problems. To judge when this is realistic, and what role policy can play, we discuss three crucial questions: Is a tipping point likely to exist, such that vicious cycles of socially damaging behavior can potentially be turned into virtuous ones? Can policy create tipping points where none exist? Can policy push the system past the tipping point?

Access the full article

View all access options to continue reading this article.

Supplementary Material

File (nyborgsm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Ostrom E., J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 137 (2000).
2
Nyborg K., Rege M., J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 52, 323 (2003).
3
Vardavas C. I., et al., PLOS ONE 8, e72945 (2013).
4
Young H. P., Annu. Rev. Econ. 7, 359 (2015).
5
Cialdini R. B., Goldstein N. J., Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 591 (2004).
6
Scheffer M., Critical Transitions in Nature and Society (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009).
7
Dubois P., Griffith R., Nevo A., Am. Econ. Rev. 104, 832 (2014).
8
Chaudhuri A., Exp. Econ. 14, 47 (2011).
9
Brekke K. A., Kipperberg G., Nyborg K., Land Econ. 86, 766 (2010).
10
Barrett S., Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2003).
11
Yoeli E., Hoffman M., Rand D. G., Nowak M. A., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 (suppl. 2), 10424 (2013).
12
Aasness M. A., Odeck J., Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 7, 34 (2015).
13
Rogers E. M., Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York, ed. 5, 2003).
14
Paluck E. L., Shepherd H., Aronow P. M., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 566 (2016).
15
Schultz P. W., Nolan J. M., Cialdini R. B., Goldstein N. J., Griskevicius V., Psychol. Sci. 18, 429 (2007).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Neither embedded figures nor equations with special characters can be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures and equations within eLetters in general. If a figure or equation is essential, please include within the text of the eLetter a link to the figure, equation, or full text with special characters at a public repository with versioning, such as Zenodo. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

ScienceAdviser

Get Science’s award-winning newsletter with the latest news, commentary, and research, free to your inbox daily.