Advertisement
FREE ACCESS
Technical Response

Response to Comment on “Worldwide evidence of a unimodal relationship between productivity and plant species richness”

Science
4 Dec 2015
Vol 350, Issue 6265
p. 1177

Abstract

Laanisto and Hutchings claim that the local species pool is a more important predictor of local plant species richness than biomass and that when the species pool is considered, there is no hump-backed relationship between biomass and richness. However, we show that by calculating a more appropriate measure of species pool, community completeness, both regional and local processes shape local richness.
Species diversity varies from habitat to habitat. Because species diversity has been related to ecological processes and ecosystem functions, it is important to predict whether species diversity may be high or low in any given environment (1). Our recent Report (2) provides evidence from data collected from grasslands in 19 countries and six continents of a unimodal relationship between herbaceous species richness and aboveground plant biomass plus plant litter, such that the maximum potential species richness occurs at intermediate levels of biomass production. We tackled the question of the diversity-productivity relationship because of its foundational role in ecological research and its controversial history (27). The data were collected at the 1-m2 scale, within 8-m-by-8-m grids, so that we could test linear and quadratic regressions at 1, 2, 4, 9, 16, 25, and 64 m2 scales. At each scale, the best descriptor of the relationship was a concave quadratic regression, but explanatory power diminished with increasing scale (2).
We point to the relevance of our findings and the scaling approach in our analysis because it provides a comparative to Laanisto and Hutchings (8). Through a reanalysis of our data, Laanisto and Hutchings (8) argue that the local species pool has a stronger effect on species richness than primary productivity. We are in agreement that large-scale processes play a role in governing local-scale diversity, but it is challenging to account for large-scale processes in an empirical study such as ours. Thus, instead of addressing whether it is more reasonable to seek for a relationship between species richness and primary productivity, or local species pool, we would rather ask what the relative role of local and regional factors is in shaping the empirically observed relationship between diversity and productivity.
Laanisto and Hutchings emphasize geographic variation in the shape of the response curve (“While the HBM [hump-backed model] certainly applies in some regions and habitats, such as high-latitude grasslands … richness-productivity relationships tend to be positive in tropical areas”). In fact, there are two confounding aspects in this statement: geographical region (with different biogeographic history) and ecosystem type (grassland versus forest). Positive relationships come predominantly from forests (9). We chose to avoid mixing different ecosystems because of the different processes that may be acting.
In their figure 1, Laanisto and Hutchings’s regression of local richness versus species pool is problematic because these two variables are inherently related, not independent, and local richness cannot exceed species pool size (10). Furthermore, all species recorded in an 8-m-by-8-m grid underestimates the local species pool. There are some techniques to overcome this problem—for example, estimating species pool size using Chao estimations (11). When applying this technique, we achieve a more complete estimate (Fig. 1A).
Fig. 1 Regional and local processes shape local species richness in globally distributed grasslands.
The relationship between (A) the Chao estimation of local species pool found in the plots of a single grid [local species pool (Chao)] and the total number of species found in that grid; (B) the mean number of species found in the plots of a single grid (mean richness) and the local species pool (the shaded area represents impossible values where no data points can be found; (C) the log(richness/dark diversity) (community completeness) and the log(local species pool); and (D) the community completeness and the mean biomass found in the plots of a single grid [log(Productivity)]. Each dot (n = 157) represents one 8- by 8-m grid containing 64 1-m2 plots [data from (14)]. Semitransparent dots are used to indicate overlapping revealed as a darker shade.
In figures 1 and 2 in (8), the analysis used by Laanisto and Hutchings could be more mathematically correct by calculating community completeness. When plotting richness against species pool, there is an upper limit where we do not have data points because richness cannot be larger than the pool. We can, however, apply a recently developed technique to model the overall trend between pool and richness using a log-ratio method of community completeness: log(local richness/dark diversity), dark diversity includes species that belong to the species pool but are currently not present locally (10, 12, 13). We cannot calculate completeness for sites where there is no dark diversity—i.e., two monoculture sites were excluded, but these two points were outliers in any event. When we back-transform the trend line, we can see that the local richness is indeed positively related to local species pool size (Fig. 1B). The trend line, however, has a significant curvature. Curvature can be measured as the negative slope between community completeness and log species pool size (Fig. 1C). Thus, local richness is not a constant proportion of species pool, and when the size of the species pool increases, relatively fewer species are represented in 1-m2 plots. This means that there are likely some local processes limiting richness.
Community completeness is a better way to express how the local species pool is realized in local plots than percentage (there are no upper and lower limits), and it works in log scale. Community completeness is negatively related to site productivity (log total biomass) (Fig. 1D). Here, the species pool effect has been taken into account, but we still see that, at high productivity, the species pool is realized less in local plots compared with low productivity. This can be due to competition. Thus, both regional and local processes shape local richness, but local processes are probably more important at high productivity.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Herbaceous Diversity Network (HerbDivNet) for the data set that has generated insights into plant diversity patterns and processes. This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant Canada awarded to L.H.F. and J.P., the Estonian Research Council (20-28, 20-29), and a European Regional Development Fund Centre of Excellence Frontiers in Biodiversity Research awarded to M.P. and M.Z.

References and Notes

1
Gaston K. J., Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405, 220–227 (2000).
2
Fraser L. H., Pither J., Jentsch A., Sternberg M., Zobel M., Askarizadeh D., Bartha S., Beierkuhnlein C., Bennett J. A., Bittel A., Boldgiv B., Boldrini I. I., Bork E., Brown L., Cabido M., Cahill J., Carlyle C. N., Campetella G., Chelli S., Cohen O., Csergo A. M., Díaz S., Enrico L., Ensing D., Fidelis A., Fridley J. D., Foster B., Garris H., Goheen J. R., Henry H. A., Hohn M., Jouri M. H., Klironomos J., Koorem K., Lawrence-Lodge R., Long R., Manning P., Mitchell R., Moora M., Müller S. C., Nabinger C., Naseri K., Overbeck G. E., Palmer T. M., Parsons S., Pesek M., Pillar V. D., Pringle R. M., Roccaforte K., Schmidt A., Shang Z., Stahlmann R., Stotz G. C., Sugiyama S., Szentes S., Thompson D., Tungalag R., Undrakhbold S., van Rooyen M., Wellstein C., Wilson J. B., Zupo T., Worldwide evidence of a unimodal relationship between productivity and plant species richness. Science 349, 302–305 (2015).
3
Grime J. P., Control of species density in herbaceous vegetation. J. Environ. Manage. 1, 151–167 (1973).
4
Adler P. B., Seabloom E. W., Borer E. T., Hillebrand H., Hautier Y., Hector A., Harpole W. S., O’Halloran L. R., Grace J. B., Anderson T. M., Bakker J. D., Biederman L. A., Brown C. S., Buckley Y. M., Calabrese L. B., Chu C. J., Cleland E. E., Collins S. L., Cottingham K. L., Crawley M. J., Damschen E. I., Davies K. F., DeCrappeo N. M., Fay P. A., Firn J., Frater P., Gasarch E. I., Gruner D. S., Hagenah N., Hille Ris Lambers J., Humphries H., Jin V. L., Kay A. D., Kirkman K. P., Klein J. A., Knops J. M., La Pierre K. J., Lambrinos J. G., Li W., MacDougall A. S., McCulley R. L., Melbourne B. A., Mitchell C. E., Moore J. L., Morgan J. W., Mortensen B., Orrock J. L., Prober S. M., Pyke D. A., Risch A. C., Schuetz M., Smith M. D., Stevens C. J., Sullivan L. L., Wang G., Wragg P. D., Wright J. P., Yang L. H., Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness. Science 333, 1750–1753 (2011).
5
Fridley J. D., Grime J. P., Huston M. A., Pierce S., Smart S. M., Thompson K., Börger L., Brooker R. W., Cerabolini B. E., Gross N., Liancourt P., Michalet R., Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y., Comment on “Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness”. Science 335, 1441-b (2012).
6
Pan X., Liu F., Zhang M., Comment on “Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness”. Science 335, 1441-a (2012).
7
Grace J. B., et al., Response to Comments on “Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness”. Science 335, 1441-c (2012).
8
Laanisto L., Hutchings M. J., Comment on “Worldwide evidence of a unimodal relationship between productivity and plant species richness”. Science 350, 1177 (2015).
9
Cornwell W. K., Grubb P. J., Regional and local patterns in plant species richness with respect to resource availability. Oikos 100, 417–428 (2003).
10
Szava-Kovats R. C., Zobel M., Pärtel M., The local-regional species richness relationship: New perspectives on the null-hypothesis. Oikos 121, 321–326 (2012).
11
A. Chao et al., Species estimation and applications, in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, Second Edition, N. Balakrishnan, C. B. Read, B. Vidakovic, Eds. (Wiley, New York, 2005), pp. 7907–7916.
12
Pärtel M., Szava-Kovats R., Zobel M., Dark diversity: Shedding light on absent species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 124–128 (2011).
13
Pärtel M., Szava-Kovats R., Zobel M., Community completeness: Linking local and dark diversity within the species pool concept. Folia Geobot. 48, 307–317 (2013).
14
Data from (2); Dryad Digital Repository; http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.038q8 (2015).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 350 | Issue 6265
4 December 2015

Submission history

Received: 28 September 2015
Accepted: 4 November 2015
Published in print: 4 December 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Herbaceous Diversity Network (HerbDivNet) for the data set that has generated insights into plant diversity patterns and processes. This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant Canada awarded to L.H.F. and J.P., the Estonian Research Council (20-28, 20-29), and a European Regional Development Fund Centre of Excellence Frontiers in Biodiversity Research awarded to M.P. and M.Z.

Authors

Affiliations

Lauchlan H. Fraser* [email protected]
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC, Canada.
Meelis Pärtel
Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Jason Pither
Department of Biology, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Anke Jentsch
Department of Disturbance Ecology, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Marcelo Sternberg
Department of Molecular Biology and Ecology of Plants, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Martin Zobel
Department of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

Notes

*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. The role of physical disturbance for litter decomposition and nutrient cycling in coastal sand dunes, Ecological Engineering, 162, (106181), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106181
    Crossref
  2. Grazing intensity drives plant diversity but does not affect forage production in a natural grassland dominated by the tussock-forming grass Andropogon lateralis Nees, Scientific Reports, 11, 1, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96208-8
    Crossref
  3. Estimating probabilistic site‐specific species pools and dark diversity from co‐occurrence data, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 30, 1, (316-326), (2020).https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13203
    Crossref
  4. Plant distribution, stature, rarity, and diversity in a patterned calcareous fen: tests of geochemical and leaf‐height models, American Journal of Botany, 106, 6, (807-820), (2019).https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1298
    Crossref
  5. History and environment shape species pools and community diversity in European beech forests, Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 3, (483-490), (2018).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0462-6
    Crossref
  6. Global Patterns in Local and Dark Diversity, Species Pool Size and Community Completeness in Ectomycorrhizal Fungi, Biogeography of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, (395-406), (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56363-3_18
    Crossref
  7. Applying the dark diversity concept to nature conservation, Conservation Biology, 31, 1, (40-47), (2016).https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12723
    Crossref
  8. Macroecology of biodiversity: disentangling local and regional effects, New Phytologist, 211, 2, (404-410), (2016).https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13943
    Crossref
Loading...

View Options

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media

(0)eLetters

eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting your own eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.