Advertisement

How to observe fault injections in real time

Faults in the ground are known to deform in response to procedures such as wastewater injection that change the pore pressure. Guglielmi et al. took a crack at monitoring this process in real time with a controlled fluid injection into an inactive fault (see the Perspective by Cornet). Reactivating the dead fault induced aseismic slip, which triggered small earthquakes. These observations can inform models of how friction is related to slip rate. The technique can also be applied to field-scale monitoring of seismicity-inducing wastewater injections.
Science, this issue p. 1224; see also p. 1204

Abstract

Anthropogenic fluid injections are known to induce earthquakes. The mechanisms involved are poorly understood, and our ability to assess the seismic hazard associated with geothermal energy or unconventional hydrocarbon production remains limited. We directly measure fault slip and seismicity induced by fluid injection into a natural fault. We observe highly dilatant and slow [~4 micrometers per second (μm/s)] aseismic slip associated with a 20-fold increase of permeability, which transitions to faster slip (~10 μm/s) associated with reduced dilatancy and micro-earthquakes. Most aseismic slip occurs within the fluid-pressurized zone and obeys a rate-strengthening friction law μ=0.67+0.045ln(vv0) with v0 = 0.1 μm/s. Fluid injection primarily triggers aseismic slip in this experiment, with micro-earthquakes being an indirect effect mediated by aseismic creep.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S6
References (2932)
Database S1

Resources

File (aab0476_databases1.xlsx)
File (guglielmi-sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Raleigh C. B., Healy J. H., Bredehoeft J. D., An experiment in earthquake control at Rangely, Colorado. Science 191, 1230–1237 (1976).
2
Ellsworth W. L., Injection-induced earthquakes. Science 341, 1225942 (2013).
3
Nicholson C., Wesson R. L., Triggered earthquakes and deep well activities. Pure Appl. Geophys. 139, 561–578 (1992).
4
Cornet F. H., Helm H., Poitrenaud H., Etchecopar A., Seismic and aseismic slips induced by large-scale fluid injections. Pure Appl. Geophys. 150, 563–583 (1997).
5
C. Nicholson, R. L. Wesson, Earthquake hazard associated with deep well injection: A report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1951 (1990); http://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/1951/report.pdf.
6
Majer E., Baria R., Stark M., Oates S., Bommer J., Smith B., Asanuma H., Induced seismicity associated with Enhanced Geothermal Systems. Geothermics 36, 185–222 (2007).
7
Hubbert M. K., Rubey W. W., Role of fluid pressure in mechanics of overthrust faulting. I. Mechanics of fluid-filled porous solids and its application to overthrust faulting. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 79, 115–166 (1959).
8
Noda H., Lapusta N., Stable creeping fault segments can become destructive as a result of dynamic weakening. Nature 493, 518–521 (2013).
9
Segall P., Rice J., Dilatancy, compaction, and slip instability of a fluid-saturated fault. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 22155–22171 (1995).
10
Scholz C., Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature 391, 37–42 (1998).
11
Bourouis S., Bernard P., Evidence for coupled seismic and aseismic fault slip during water injection in the geothermal site of Soultz (France), and implications for seismogenic transients. Geophys. J. Int. 169, 723–732 (2007).
12
M. Zoback, A. Kohli, I. Das, M. McClure, The importance of slow slip on faults during hydraulic fracturing stimulation of shale gas reservoirs, SPE 155476, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Americas Unconventional Resources Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 5 to 7 June 2012.
13
Guglielmi Y., Cappa F., Lancon H., Janowczyk J. B., Rutqvist J., Tsang C. F., Wang J., ISRM suggested method for step-rate injection method for fracture in-situ properties (SIMFIP): Using a 3-components borehole deformation sensor. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 47, 303–311 (2014).
14
Laboratoire Souterrain à Bas Bruit, www.lsbb.eu
15
Jeanne P., Guglielmi Y., Lamarche J., Cappa F., Marie L., Architectural characteristics and petrophysical properties evolution of a strike-slip fault zone in a fractured porous carbonate reservoir. J. Struct. Geol. 44, 93–109 (2012).
16
Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials on Science Online.
17
Haimson B. C., Cornet F. H., ISRM suggested methods for rock stress estimation – Part 3: Hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF). Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 40, 1011–1020 (2003).
18
Das I., Zoback M., Long-period, long-duration seismic events during hydraulic fracture stimulation of a shale gas reservoir. Leading Edge (Tulsa Okla.) 30, 778–786 (2011).
19
Rutqvist J., Stephansson O., The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering. Hydrol. J. 11, 7–40 (2003).
20
Cappa F., Guglielmi Y., Virieux J., Stress and fluid transfer in a fault zone due to overpressures in the seismogenic crust. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L05301 (2007).
21
Cappa F., Rutqvist J., Modeling of coupled deformation and permeability evolution during fault reactivation induced by deep underground injection of CO2. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 5, 336–346 (2011).
22
Scotti O., Cornet F. H., In situ evidence for fluid-induced aseismic slip events along fault zones. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 31, 347–358 (1994).
23
Perfettini H., Avouac J. P., Postseismic relaxation driven by brittle creep: A possible mechanism to reconcile geodetic measurements and the decay rate of aftershocks, application to the Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan. J. Geophys. Res. 109, B02304 (2004).
24
Marone C., Laboratory-derived friction laws and their application to seismic faulting. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 26, 643–696 (1998).
25
Marone C., Scholtz C., Bilham R., On the mechanics of earthquake afterslip. J. Geophys. Res. 96 (B5), 8441–8452 (1991).
26
Tesei T., Collettini C., Barchi M. R., Carpenter B. M., Di Stefano G., Heterogeneous strength and fault zone complexity of carbonate-bearing thrusts with possible implications for seismicity. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 408, 307–318 (2014).
27
Carpenter B. M., Scuderi M. M., Collettini C., Marone C., Frictional heterogeneities on carbonate-bearing normal faults: Insights from the Monte Maggio Fault, Italy. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119, 9062–9076 (2014).
28
Verberne B. A., He C. R., Spiers C. J., Frictional properties of sedimentary rocks and natural fault gouge from the Longmen Shan Fault Zone, Sichuan, China. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100 (5B), 2767–2790 (2010).
29
Itasca Consulting Group, (2006), FLAC3D, Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensions. Version 3.0. Five volumes. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Itasca Consulting Group.
30
Eshelby J. D., The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion and related problems. Proc. R. Soc. London 241, 376–396 (1957).
31
Dieterich J. H., Modeling of rock friction, 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J. Geophys. Res. 84 (B5), 2161–2168 (1979).
32
Ruina A. L., Slip instability and state variable friction laws. J. Geophys. Res. 88 (B12), 10359–10370 (1983).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 348 | Issue 6240
12 June 2015

Submission history

Received: 3 March 2015
Accepted: 9 May 2015
Published in print: 12 June 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

The experimental work was funded by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) Captage de CO2 through the HPPP-CO2 project and by PACA through the PETRO-PRO project. The rate-and-state fault models for this study were supported by the French Academy of Sciences, the California Institute of Technology Tectonics Observatory, and the ANR HYDROSEIS under contract ANR-13-JS06-0004-01. We thank the SITES S.A.S. engineers H. Caron, C. Micollier, R. Blin, and H. Lançon, and the Petrometalic S.A. engineer J. B. Janovczyk, who jointly developed and operated the probe that enabled this experiment. We also thank the Laboratoire Souterrain à Bas Bruit (LSBB) engineers’ team for their technical support during the installation of the experiment in one of the LSBB boreholes (www.lsbb.eu). Experimental data are available in the supplementary materials.

Authors

Affiliations

Yves Guglielmi* [email protected]
Centre de Recherche et d’Enseignement de Géosciences de l’Environnement (UMR7330), University of Aix-Marseille, CNRS, IRD, 13545 Aix-en-Provence, France.
Frédéric Cappa
Géoazur (UMR 7329), University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS, IRD, Côte d’Azur Observatory, 06560 Sophia-Antipolis, France.
Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Jean-Philippe Avouac
Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Present address: Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 OEZ, UK.
Pierre Henry
Centre de Recherche et d’Enseignement de Géosciences de l’Environnement (UMR7330), University of Aix-Marseille, CNRS, IRD, 13545 Aix-en-Provence, France.
Derek Elsworth
Energy and Mineral Engineering and Geosciences, Earth and Mineral Sciences Energy Institute and G3 Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Notes

*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Underground In-situ Acoustic Emission in Study of Rock Stability and Earthquake Physics, Acoustic Emission Testing, (403-476), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67936-1_16
    Crossref
  2. Linear and nonlinear fluid flow responses of connected fractures subject to shearing under constant normal load and constant normal stiffness boundary conditions, Computers and Geotechnics, 141, (104517), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104517
    Crossref
  3. Synchronized and asynchronous modulation of seismicity by hydrological loading: A case study in Taiwan, Science Advances, 7, 16, (2021)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.abf7282
    Abstract
  4. Effect of Porosity and Permeability Evolution on Injection‐Induced Aseismic Slip, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126, 7, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021258
    Crossref
  5. Adaptive finite element–discrete element analysis for stratal movement and microseismic behaviours induced by multistage propagation of three-dimensional multiple hydraulic fractures, Engineering Computations, 38, 6, (2781-2809), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-07-2020-0379
    Crossref
  6. Fluid Overpressurization of Rock Fractures: Experimental Investigation and Analytical Modeling, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 54, 6, (3039-3050), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02453-8
    Crossref
  7. Thermo‐Hydro‐Mechanical Model and Caprock Deformation Explain the Onset of an Ongoing Seismo‐Volcanic Unrest, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126, 3, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020449
    Crossref
  8. Evaluation of shear slip stress transfer mechanism for induced microseismicity at In Salah CO2 storage site, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 107, (103302), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103302
    Crossref
  9. Laboratory-Scale Investigation of the Slippage of a Natural Fracture Resulting from an Approaching Hydraulic Fracture, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 54, 5, (2547-2558), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02398-y
    Crossref
  10. Geothermal reservoir stimulation through hydro-shearing: an experimental study under conditions close to enhanced geothermal systems, Geothermics, 96, (102200), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102200
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share