Advertisement
Perspective
Ecology

Human-wildlife conflicts in a crowded airspace

Science1 May 2015Vol 348, Issue 6234pp. 502-504DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa6743

Abstract

Over the past century, humans have increasingly used the airspace for purposes such as transportation, energy generation, and surveillance. Conflict with wildlife may arise from buildings, turbines, power lines, and antennae that project into space and from flying objects such as aircrafts, helicopters, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs, or drones) (see the figure) (13). The resulting collision and disturbance risks profoundly affect species ecology and conservation (1, 4, 5). Yet, aerial interactions between humans and wildlife are often neglected when considering the ecological consequences of human activities.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

References and Notes

1
Martin G. R., Ibis 153, 239 (2011).
2
Dolbeer R. A., Wright S. E., Weller J. R., Begier M. J., Wildlife strikes to civil aircraft in the United States 1990–2013 (Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, 2014); see www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/wildlife/resources/media/bash90-11.pdf.
3
Vas E., Lescroël A., Duriez O., Boguszewski G., Grémillet D., Biol. Lett. 11, 20140754 (2015).
4
Kunz T. H., et al., Integr. Comp. Biol. 48, 1 (2008).
5
Dai K., Bergot A., Liang C., Xiang W.-N., Huang Z., Renew. Energy 75, 911 (2015).
6
Bauer S., Hoye B. J., Science 344, 1242552 (2014).
7
Dolbeer R. A., J. Wildl. Manage. 70, 1345 (2006).
8
Satheesan S. M., Satheesan M., Serious vulture-hits to aircraft over the world (International Bird Strike Committee IBSC25/WP-SA3, Amsterdam, 2000).
9
Creamean J. M., et al., Science 339, 1572 (2013).
10
Polymenakou P. N., Atmosphere (Toronto) 3, 87 (2012).
11
Anderson K., Gaston K. J., Front. Ecol. Environ 11, 138 (2013).
12
Hayes B., et al., Eurodrones Inc. (Transnational Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2014).
13
Gaston K. J., et al., Biol. Rev. 88, 912 (2013).
14
Lambertucci S. A., et al., Biol. Conserv. 170, 145 (2014).
15
Diehl R. H., Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 377 (2013).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 348 | Issue 6234
1 May 2015

Submission history

Published in print: 1 May 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank PICT1156/2010, PIP 0095, CONICET, and Swansea University for funding; reviewers for comments; and F. Ballejo for help with the figure.

Authors

Affiliations

Sergio A. Lambertucci
Laboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA (CONICET–Universidad Nacional del Comahue), Bariloche, 8400, Argentina.
Emily L. C. Shepard
Swansea Lab for Animal Movement, Biosciences, Swansea University, UK.
Rory P. Wilson
Swansea Lab for Animal Movement, Biosciences, Swansea University, UK.

Notes

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media