Skip to main content
Advertisement
Main content starts here
No access
Policy Forum
Sustainability

Secure sustainable seafood from developing countries

Require improvements as conditions for market access
Science
1 May 2015
Vol 348, Issue 6234
pp. 504-506

Abstract

Demand for sustainably certified wild-caught fish and crustaceans is increasingly shaping global seafood markets. Retailers such as Walmart in the United States, Sainsbury's in the United Kingdom, and Carrefour in France, and processors such as Canadianbased High Liner Foods, have promised to source all fresh, frozen, farmed, and wild seafood from sustainable sources by 2015 (1, 2). Credible arbiters of certifications, such as the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), require detailed environmental and traceability standards. Although these standards have been met in many commercial fisheries throughout the developed world (3), developing country fisheries (DCFs) represent only 7% of ~220 total MSC-certified fisheries (4, 5). With the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization reporting that developing countries account for ~50% of seafood entering international trade, this presents a fundamental challenge for marketers of sustainable seafood (see the photo).

Access the full article

View all access options to continue reading this article.

Supplementary Material

File (aaa4639-sampson-sm.pdf)

References and Notes

2
MSC, Annual report 2013–2014 (MSC, London, 2014).
3
Pérez-Ramírez M., et al., Mar. Policy 36, 297 (2012).
4
MSC, Global impacts report 2013: Monitoring and evaluation (MSC, London, 2013).
5
Jacquet J., et al., Nature 467, 28 (2010).
6
Bush S. R., et al., Mar. Policy 37, 288 (2013).
7
Mills M., et al., Conserv. Lett. 6, 418 (2013).
8
Micheli F., et al., Front. Ecol. Environ 12, 297 (2014).
9
Bush S., Oosterveer P., Sustainability 7, 1861 (2015).
10
Deighan L. K., Jenkins L. D., Mar. Policy 51, 476 (2015).
11
Christian C., et al., Biol. Conserv. 161, 10 (2013).
12
Goyert W., et al., Mar. Policy 34, 1103 (2010).
13
Communicating Fishery Improvement Projects—Guidance from Sustainable Fisheries Partnership (SFP, Honolulu, 2013); www.sustainablefish.org.
14
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Fishery Improvement Partnership Fund, www.nfwf.org/fipfund/Pages/home.aspx#.VSvyjfBLOh0.
15
16
Pérez-Ramírez M., Ponce-Díaz G., Lluch-Cota S., Ocean Coast. Manage. 63, 24 (2012).
17
Ruddle K., Hickey F., Environ. Dev. Sustain. 10, 565–589 (2008).
18
Crona B., et al., Mar. Policy 34, 761 (2010).
19
Asche F., et al., World Dev. 67, 151 (2015).
20
Borit M., Olsen P., Mar. Policy 36, 96 (2012).
21
Helyar S. J., et al., PLOS ONE 9, e98691 (2014).
22
Trumble R. J., A review of the Ecuador mahi mahi Fishery Improvement Project Ecuador Mahi Mahi FIP Review Meeting, Manta, Ecuador, 27 and 28 March 2013 (MRAG Americas, Inc., St. Petersburg, FL, 2013).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Neither embedded figures nor equations with special characters can be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures and equations within eLetters in general. If a figure or equation is essential, please include within the text of the eLetter a link to the figure, equation, or full text with special characters at a public repository with versioning, such as Zenodo. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

ScienceAdviser

Get Science’s award-winning newsletter with the latest news, commentary, and research, free to your inbox daily.