Advertisement

Abstract

Plant disease resistance (R) genes confer an ability to resist infection by pathogens expressing specific corresponding avirulence genes. In Arabidopsis thaliana, resistance to both bacterial and fungal pathogens, mediated by several Rgene products, requires the NDR1 gene. Positional cloning was used to isolate NDR1, which encodes a 660–base pair open reading frame. The predicted 219–amino acid sequence suggests that NDR1 may be associated with a membrane. NDR1 expression is induced in response to pathogen challenge and may function to integrate various pathogen recognition signals.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

REFERENCES AND NOTES

1
Flor H., Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 9, 275 (1971);
Keen N. T., Annu. Rev. Genet. 24, 447 (1990).
2
Staskawicz B. J., Ausubel F. M., Baker B. J., Ellis J. G., Jones J. D. G., Science 268, 661 (1995);
Baker B., Zambryski P., Staskawicz B., Dinesh-Kumar S. P., ibid. 276, 726 (1997).
3
Kobe B., Deisenhofer J., Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 415 (1994).
4
Century K. S., Holub E. B., Staskawicz B. J., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 6597 (1995).
5
A segregating population from a cross between Col-0 ndr1-1/ndr1-1 and La-er NDR1/NDR1 plants was used for genetic mapping. Molecular markers were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (Ohio State University) and were mapped relative to NDR1. Flanking PCR markers nga162 (19) and gl1 (20) (22 cM apart) were used to rapidly prescreen large numbers of susceptible F2 plants for recombinants. F3 families from recombinant plants were then used to identify recombination events between RFLP markers tightly linked to NDR1, as well as to verify the genotype of the recombinants by disease assays (21).
6
Four YAC libraries (22) of Arabidopsis accession Col-0 genomic DNA were screened with 560B1 and pCIT1240 as hybridization probes. Plant DNA insert ends were isolated from YAC clones by inverse PCR and plasmid rescue as described (23), and were converted to RFLP markers for genetic mapping. The contig was extended until an overlapping set of YAC clones was constructed that linked the clones identified with 560B1 to those that hybridized with pCIT1240.
7
For construction of cosmid libraries, yeast DNA from clones CIC3D12 and CIC7E1 was partially digested with Sau 3A, size fractionated (to 15 to 20 kb), and cloned into the Bam HI site of the binary vector pCLD04541 (24). Clones carrying Arabidopsis DNA were isolated by hybridization with RFLP markers that cosegregated with NDR1. Cosmids were organized into overlapping contig islands by restriction analysis and hybridization patterns. The discovery of the 1.2-kb deletion in the area spanned by cosmid FH6 focused our efforts on cosmids in that region. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of ndr1-1 plants was performed using the vacuum infiltration procedure of Bechtold et al. (25), with modifications as described by Bent et al. (24). T1 seeds were surface-sterilized, and transformants were selected on agar-solidified Murashige-Skoog medium containing kanamycin (40 mg/ml). After 1 week, green plants were transferred to potting mix and inoculated after 3 to 5 weeks growth. The HR assay used to test for complementation is described by Kunkel et al. (26). Psm strain 4326 lacking an avr gene recognized by Arabidopsis plants does not cause a visible HR and was used as a negative control inoculation. Cosmids that lacked the region encompassed by the deletion (Fig. 1C) did not restore the HR resistance response in ndr1-1 plants. Thus, the region encoding NDR1 was delimited to a 3.5-kb section.
8
To sequence genomic DNA spanning the deletion in the ndr1-1 mutant, we sonicated cosmid FH6 DNA, then size-selected ∼1-kb fragments on agarose gels, purified them with GeneClean (Bio 101, Vista, CA), and subcloned them into the Eco RV site of pBluescript (Stratagene). Two Hind III fragments which spanned the deletion were isolated from FH6, radiolabeled, and used as probes against the subclones. DNA sequences from these subclones were obtained by the cyclic reaction termination method, using fluorescently labeled dideoxyribonucleotide triphosphates and following the instructions provided with the PRISM Ready Reaction DyeDeoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Perkin-Elmer). DNA Sequencing Analysis, version 2.01 (Applied Biosystems) and SeqEd, version 1.03 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI) were used to process raw data. Sequences were aligned and analyzed with Sequencher 3.0 for the Macintosh.
9
ndr1-2 and ndr1-3 alleles were gifts from R. Innes.
10
P. P. Repetti and B. J. Staskawicz, data not shown.
11
Pongor S., et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 3610 (1994).
12
Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J., J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403 (1990).
13
Gopalan S., Wei W., He S. Y., Plant J. 10, 591 (1996).
14
E. E. Karrer, R. N. Beachy, C. A. Holt, Plant Mol. Biol., in press.
15
With hin1, there are three regions of similarity to NDR1: across amino acids 20 through 42 containing the first putative transmembrane domain there is 60% similarity, including conservative substitutions; across amino acids 73 through 85 there is 69% similarity; and from amino acids 113 through 118 there is 100% identity. When compared with clone NG2, from amino acids 146 through 167 there is 86% similarity to NDR1.
16
K. S. Century and B. J. Staskawicz, data not shown.
17
Hammond-Kosack K. E., Jones D. A., Jones J. D. G., Plant Cell 6, 361 (1994);
Salmeron J. M., et al., Cell 86, 123 (1996);
Freialdenhoven A., Peterhänsel C., Kurth J., Kreuzaler F., Schulze-Lefert P., Plant Cell 8, 5 (1996).
18
Parker J. E., et al., Plant Cell 8, 2033 (1996).
19
Bell C. J., Ecker J. R., Genomics 19, 137 (1994).
20
Konieczny A., Ausubel F. M., Plant J. 4, 403 (1993).
21
Whalen M., Innes R., Bent A., Staskawicz B., Plant Cell 3, 49 (1991).
22
J. R. Ecker, Methods Companion Methods Enzymol. 1, 186 (1990);
Ward E. R., Jen G. C., Plant Mol. Biol. 14, 561 (1990);
Grill E., Somerville C., Mol. Gen. Genet. 226, 484 (1991);
Creusot F., et al., Plant J. 8, 763 (1995).
23
Schmidt R., Cnops G., Bancroft I., Dean C., Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 19, 341 (1992).
24
Bent A. F., et al., Science 265, 1856 (1994).
25
N. Bechtold, J. Ellis, G. Pelletier, C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. III Life Sci. 316, 1194 (1993).
26
Kunkel B. N., Bent A. F., Dahlbeck D., Innes R. W., Staskawicz B. J., Plant Cell 5, 865 (1993).
27
Whalen M. C., Stall R. E., Staskawicz B. J., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 6743 (1988).
28
Single-letter abbreviations for the amino acid residues are as follows: A, Ala; C, Cys; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe; G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile; K, Lys; L, Leu; M, Met; N, Asn; P, Pro; Q, Gln; R, Arg; S, Ser; T, Thr; V, Val; W, Trp; and Y, Tyr.
29
F. M. Ausubel et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992).
30
Jorgensen R. A., Cuellar R. E., Thompson W. F., Kavanagh T. A., Plant Mol. Biol. 8, 3 (1987).
31
Holub E. B., Beynon J. L., Crute I. R., Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 7, 223 (1994).
32
We thank R. Innes for the generous gift of ndr1-2 and ndr1-3 mutants and P. Schulze-Lefert for critical reading of the manuscript. Supported by an NSF predoctoral fellowship to K.S.C., an NIH postdoctoral fellowship to A.D.S., and NSF grant MCB-9219959 to B.J.S.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 278 | Issue 5345
12 December 1997

Submission history

Received: 30 May 1997
Accepted: 3 November 1997
Published in print: 12 December 1997

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Notes

*
Present address: Biology Department, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA.
Present address: Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19717, USA.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. WUSCHEL triggers innate antiviral immunity in plant stem cells, Science, 370, 6513, (227-231), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.abb7360
    Abstract
  2. Active DNA Demethylation in Plant Companion Cells Reinforces Transposon Methylation in Gametes, Science, 337, 6100, (1360-1364), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1224839
    Abstract
  3. The Role of Membrane-Bound Ankyrin-Repeat Protein ACD6 in Programmed Cell Death and Plant Defense, Science's STKE, 2004, 221, (pe6-pe6), (2021)./doi/10.1126/stke.2212004pe6
    Abstract
  4. The RAR1 Interactor SGT1, an Essential Component of R Gene-Triggered Disease Resistance, Science, 295, 5562, (2073-2076), (2002)./doi/10.1126/science.1067554
    Abstract
  5. Arabidopsis thaliana: A Model Plant for Genome Analysis, Science, 282, 5389, (662-682), (1998)./doi/10.1126/science.282.5389.662
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media