Advertisement

Abstract

The basic features of the U.S. energy supply and utilization system change so slowly that an understanding of the dynamics of major change requires projections that extend several decades. Over such a time most energy-consuming capital stock is replaced, life-styles change, and technology evolves. This study of plausible low energy futures leans heavily on detailed engineering analysis of demand by sector, combined with econometric techniques where appropriate. The results indicate that, given time for the system to respond to prices, regulations, and incentives, U.S. energy demand is very elastic. Consequently, a major slowdown in demand growth can be achieved simultaneously with significant economic growth by substituting technological sophistication for energy consumption.

References

CONAES Panel on Demand and Conservation, Outlook for Energy Demand and Conservation, in press.
A Time To Choose: America's Energy Future (1974).
BARNES, R, EVALUATION NEW ENERG (1975).
BOFFEY, P.M., ACADEMY STUDY FINDS LOW-ENERGY GROWTH WONT BE PAINFUL, SCIENCE 195: 380 (1977).
FORD, K.W., EFFICIENT USE ENERGY (1975).
GIBBS, J.P., CRIME PUNISHMENT DET: 105 (1975).
GYFTOPOLOUS, E.P., POTENTIAL FUEL EFFEC (1975).
HERENDEEN, R, ENERGY 1: 165 (1976).
HIRST, E, ENERGY 2: 131 (1977).
Holdren, testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Power, Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, 22 March (1977).
Hoskins, R., Energy and Cost Analysis of Residential Refrigerators (1977).
Kissinger, H., address before the Alliance to Conserve Energy, Chicago, 11 June (1977).
LOVINS, A, SOFT ENERGY PATHS TO (1977).
SCHIPPER, L, LOGIC OF ENERGY-CONSERVATION, TECHNOLOGY REVIEW 80: 40 (1978).
Tavoulareas, W., A Debate on "A Time to Choose" (1977).
WHITTLE, C, ORAUIEA764 REP (1976).
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 200 | Issue 4338
14 April 1978

Submission history

Published in print: 14 April 1978

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Demand and Conservation Panel of the Committee on Nuclear and Alternative Energy Systems

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. President Clinton's Science Adviser, Science, 259, 5094, (439-439), (1993)./doi/10.1126/science.259.5094.439
    Abstract
  2. Trends in Industrial Use of Energy, Science, 226, 4680, (1277-1283), (1984)./doi/10.1126/science.226.4680.1277
    Abstract
  3. Energy Demand Forecasts, Science, 210, 4469, (480-480), (1980)./doi/10.1126/science.210.4469.480-b
    Abstract
  4. Academy Energy Report Stresses Conservation, Science, 207, 4429, (385-386), (1980)./doi/10.1126/science.207.4429.385
    Abstract
  5. Energy Demand Forecasts, Science, 210, 4469, (480-480), (1980)./doi/10.1126/science.210.4469.480.b
    Abstract
  6. Fission Power: An Evolutionary Strategy, Science, 203, 4378, (330-337), (1979)./doi/10.1126/science.203.4378.330
    Abstract
  7. Energy Resources Available to the United States, 1985 to 2000, Science, 203, 4377, (233-239), (1979)./doi/10.1126/science.203.4377.233
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share