Interpersonal and Economic Resources: Their structure and differential properties offer new insight into problems of modern society.
Abstract
High population density and increased institutional specialization, which are relatively novel features of human society. have provided conditions for a more efficient exchange of universalistic resources, while decreasing the opportunity for exchanging particularistic ones. The parallel with physical environment is striking: in both cases technology has created new problems in the process of solving old ones. Whether it is natural resources or interpersonal resources, physical ecology or social ecology, recognizing and defining the new problem is the first step toward its solution.
The importance of particularistic resources in solving problems of modern society has scarcely been recognized. Welfare institutions, for example, often require clients to lose status for the money they receive. This form of exchange deprives the client of a resource which is already scarce for him, thus further reducing his chances of autonomous performance as a resource exchanger in society. By ignoring the significance of particularistic resources for social functioning, we tend to see the solution of social problems exclusively in terms of a better distribution of economic resources. Improvement of education, for instance, is considered almost equivalent to allocating more money for schools. Truly money is one of the neighbors of information in the order, but the other one is status. Evidence to suggest that higher status improves educational achievement has, indeed, been repeatedly reported (26).
The very mention of particularistic resources in social planning causes uneasiness and bafflement. The economist Levitan (27), for example, in reviewing the activities of VISTA (a program of the Office of Economic Opportunity), wonders how to evaluate goals such as dedication, involvement, and good feeling. The reluctance to include particularistic resources in social engineering will hopefully decrease as we improve techniques for their observation and measurement and as we begin to understand their rules of exchange and their relationship to other resources. The work described here may constitute a step in such a direction.
The opportunity to progress more decisively toward a comprehensive picture of the state of resources in society is provided by the proposal to institute social indicators (28). Properly constructed they could supply much needed information about resource deficiencies that affect the health of society and could suggest. measures to overcome them.
The purpose of this article has been to summarize some of the knowledge we already possess about interpersonal resources and to outline its application to certain problems of modern society. It has been shown that when resources are classified into six categories and plotted on a two-coordinate space a definite structural pattern emerges. The position of each resource class in the structure appears related to certain properties which in turn affect differentially the exchange of resources in an urban environment. The structural characteristics of resources provide a theoretical basis for the understanding and solution of social problems in modern culture.
References
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 388 (1970).
Perspective in Human Deprivation: Biological, Psychological and Sociological (1968).
Blau, P. M., Exchange and Power in Social Life (1967).
CALHOUN, J.B., POPULATION DENSITY AND SOCIAL PATHOLOGY, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 206: 139 (1962).
Carpenter, C. R., Primate Social Behavior: 24 (1963).
Cartwright, D., Group Dynamics: Research and Theory: 215 (1968).
CHEMERS, M.M., INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 1: 301 (1966).
Coleman, J. S., Equality of Educational Opportunity: CH3 (1966).
DUNCAN, S, NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN 72: 118 (1969).
ELDRED, S.H., DISOR COMMUN 42: 381 (1964).
ELDRED, S.H., PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH REPORTS 19 (1964).
Etzioni, A., The Active Society (1968).
Fielder, F. E., Organizational Research Report 70-5 (1970).
Foa, E. B., in preparation.
FOA, E.B., THESIS U MISSOURI (1970).
Foa, U. G., Communication: Concepts and Perspective: 135 (1967).
Foa, U. G., Sociological Inquiry 41: 149 (1971).
FOA, U, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 2: 45 (1967).
FOA, U.G., CROSS-CULTURAL SIMILARITY AND DIFFERENCE IN INTERPERSONAL-BEHAVIOR, JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 68: 517 (1964).
Foa, U. G., Psychol. Monogr. 623 (1966).
Foa, E. B., Studies in Dyadic Communication (1972).
Glass, D. C., Environmental Influences (1968).
HARLOW, H.F., NATURE OF LOVE-SIMPLIFIED, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 25: 161 (1970).
Harlow, H. F., Scientific American 207:136 (1962).
HERBERS, J, NEW YORK TIMES: 1 (2 11 1970).
HERBERS, J, NEW YORK TIMES: 36 (2 11 1970).
Homans, G. C., Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms (1961).
Hunt, J. M., Intelligence and Expertence: 346 (1961).
Johnsgard, P. A., Animal Behavior: 71 (1967).
LATANE, B, BYSTANDER APATHY, AMERICAN SCIENTIST 57: 244 (1969).
Levitan, S. A., The Great Society Poor Law: A New Approach to Poverty: 223 (1969).
LONGABAUGH, R, A CATEGORY SYSTEM FOR CODING INTERPERSONAL-BEHAVIOR AS SOCIAL-EXCHANGE, SOCIOMETRY 26: 319 (1963).
MASLOW, A.H., THEORY OF METAMOTIVATION - BIOLOGICAL ROOTING OF VALUE-LIFE, JOURNAL OF HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY 7: 93 (1967).
MILGRAM, S, EXPERIENCE OF LIVING IN CITIES, SCIENCE 167: 1461 (1970).
MITCHELL, T.R., DIFFUSION OF EFFECT OF CULTURAL TRAINING OF LEADER IN STRUCTURE OF HETEROCULTURAL TASK GROUPS, AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 21: 31 (1969).
Myrdal, G., The Challenge of World Poverty: 13 (1970).
NYE, F.I., FAMILY SIZE, INTERACTION, AFFECT AND STRESS, JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY 32: 216 (1970).
ROSEN, S, COMPARATIVE ROLES OF INFORMATIONAL AND MATERIAL COMMODITIES IN INTERPERSONAL TRANSACTIONS, JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2: 211 (1966).
Rosenthal, R., Pygmalion in the Classroom (1968).
Thibaut, J. W., SThe Social Psychology of Groups (1959).
Turner, J. L., in preparation.
TURNER, J.L., THESIS U MISSOURI (1970).
Zimbardo, P. G., paper presented at the Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (1969).
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber?Sign In
Information & Authors
Information
Published In

Science
Volume 171 | Issue 3969
29 January 1971
29 January 1971
Copyright
© 1971.
Submission history
Published in print: 29 January 1971
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Altmetrics
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Log in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
- Become a AAAS Member
- Activate your AAAS ID
- Purchase Access to Other Journals in the Science Family
- Account Help
Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options
Purchase digital access to this article
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
Download PDF





