The Tragedy of the Commons: The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality.
Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
(0)eLetters
eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.
Log In to Submit a ResponseNo eLetters have been published for this article yet.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In

13 December 1968
Copyright
Submission history
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite as
- Garrett Hardin
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Cited by
- International trade and the survival of mammalian and reptilian species, Science Advances, 8, 1, (2022)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.abh3442
- Summer reading 2021, Science, 372, 6546, (1030-1035), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.abj2923
- The global network of ports supporting high seas fishing, Science Advances, 7, 9, (2021)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.abe3470
- The challenge of antimicrobial resistance: What economics can contribute, Science, 364, 6435, (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aau4679
- The ecology of an olfactory trap, Science, 362, 6417, (904-904), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aav6873
- Tragedy revisited, Science, 362, 6420, (1236-1241), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aaw0911
- A human-driven decline in global burned area, Science, 356, 6345, (1356-1362), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aal4108
- Sea change, Science, 355, 6329, (1030-1030), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aam6497
- Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems, Science, 357, 6352, (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aan1114
- Beyond the roots of human inaction: Fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation, Science, 356, 6335, (275-279), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aal1931
View Options
Check Access
Log in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
- Become a AAAS Member
- Activate your AAAS ID
- Purchase Access to Other Journals in the Science Family
- Account Help
More options
Purchase digital access to this article
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.







RE: Education can counteract the natural tendency to do the wrong thing, but the inexorable succession of generations requires that the basis for this knowledge be constantly refreshed.
The microscope we use for discussions of this nature can be labelled, "First World", or maybe, geographically, "North Atlantea".
The refreshment of knowledge of this sort has traditionally be led by the religious. But in the third millennium Religion has relegated itself to the background: at least as an operator of significance.
We can look at this theme of Continual Development as a form of uncontrolled appetite: greed, if you like. What repository of teachable sentimentaltity can be maintained in this climate?
What we might be pleased to label the Apex Societies have, to all intents, run out of road. The article reflects this and demonstrates the operational mechanisms.
Are there societies who function on an alternative basis? If there were, they would be found somewhat apart from the mainstream.
For some time we've been encouraged, educated, habituated to the paradigm of the Commons. Maybe it's too late to fix.
Thanks. Tremendous article, late to my view.
RE: coercion in reproduction
Wow, dangerous stuff in the 2016 eletter. Would MWS consider not trying to suppress the free exchange of ideas?
RE: coercion in reproduction
Wow, dangerous stuff, this article. Would SCIENCE mag consider removing this from its website?