Advertisement

Inheritance of a covalent histone modification

Genomic DNA is the repository of all genetic information and is packaged into chromatin. Chromatin is also a repository of regulatory information in the form of covalent marks added to the histones that package the DNA. These marks can determine tissue- and organ-specific gene expression patterns, which must be transmitted to daughter cells to maintain their identity. Ragunathan et al. and Audergon et al. show that in fission yeast, a chromatin mark, like genetic information, can be inherited across many cell generations. The mark can be inherited independently of DNA sequence, DNA methylation, or RNA interference. Thus, histone marks constitute true epigenetic information.
Science, this issue 10.1126/science.1258699; see also p. 132

Abstract

Posttranslational histone modifications are believed to allow the epigenetic transmission of distinct chromatin states, independently of associated DNA sequences. Histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation is essential for heterochromatin formation; however, a demonstration of its epigenetic heritability is lacking. Fission yeast has a single H3K9 methyltransferase, Clr4, that directs all H3K9 methylation and heterochromatin. Using releasable tethered Clr4 reveals that an active process rapidly erases H3K9 methylation from tethering sites in wild-type cells. However, inactivation of the putative histone demethylase Epe1 allows H3K9 methylation and silent chromatin maintenance at the tethering site through many mitotic divisions, and transgenerationally through meiosis, after release of tethered Clr4. Thus, H3K9 methylation is a heritable epigenetic mark whose transmission is usually countered by its active removal, which prevents the unauthorized inheritance of heterochromatin.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S10
Tables S1 to S3
Reference (32)

Resources

File (audergon.sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Almouzni G., Probst A. V., Heterochromatin maintenance and establishment: Lessons from the mouse pericentromere. Nucleus 2, 332–338 (2011).
2
Bannister A. J., Zegerman P., Partridge J. F., Miska E. A., Thomas J. O., Allshire R. C., Kouzarides T., Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature 410, 120–124 (2001).
3
Lachner M., O’Carroll D., Rea S., Mechtler K., Jenuwein T., Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature 410, 116–120 (2001).
4
Zhang K., Mosch K., Fischle W., Grewal S. I., Roles of the Clr4 methyltransferase complex in nucleation, spreading and maintenance of heterochromatin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 381–388 (2008).
5
Wang T., Xu C., Liu Y., Fan K., Li Z., Sun X., Ouyang H., Zhang X., Zhang J., Li Y., Mackenzie F., Min J., Tu X., Crystal structure of the human SUV39H1 chromodomain and its recognition of histone H3K9me2/3. PLOS ONE 7, e52977 (2012).
6
Jacobs S. A., Fischle W., Khorasanizadeh S., Assays for the determination of structure and dynamics of the interaction of the chromodomain with histone peptides. Methods Enzymol. 376, 131–148 (2003).
7
Aagaard L., Laible G., Selenko P., Schmid M., Dorn R., Schotta G., Kuhfittig S., Wolf A., Lebersorger A., Singh P. B., Reuter G., Jenuwein T., Functional mammalian homologues of the Drosophila PEV-modifier Su(var)3-9 encode centromere-associated proteins which complex with the heterochromatin component M31. EMBO J. 18, 1923–1938 (1999).
8
Rivera C., Gurard-Levin Z. A., Almouzni G., Loyola A., Histone lysine methylation and chromatin replication. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1839, 1433–1439 (2014).
9
Zhu B., Reinberg D., Epigenetic inheritance: Uncontested? Cell Res. 21, 435–441 (2011).
10
Cheng X., Structural and functional coordination of DNA and histone methylation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 6, a018747 (2014).
11
Hathaway N. A., Bell O., Hodges C., Miller E. L., Neel D. S., Crabtree G. R., Dynamics and memory of heterochromatin in living cells. Cell 149, 1447–1460 (2012).
12
Nakayama J., Rice J. C., Strahl B. D., Allis C. D., Grewal S. I., Role of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in epigenetic control of heterochromatin assembly. Science 292, 110–113 (2001).
13
Reyes-Turcu F. E., Grewal S. I., Different means, same end-heterochromatin formation by RNAi and RNAi-independent RNA processing factors in fission yeast. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22, 156–163 (2012).
14
Castel S. E., Martienssen R. A., RNA interference in the nucleus: Roles for small RNAs in transcription, epigenetics and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 100–112 (2013).
15
Buscaino A., Lejeune E., Audergon P., Hamilton G., Pidoux A., Allshire R. C., Distinct roles for Sir2 and RNAi in centromeric heterochromatin nucleation, spreading and maintenance. EMBO J. 32, 1250–1264 (2013).
16
Wheeler B. S., Ruderman B. T., Willard H. F., Scott K. C., Uncoupling of genomic and epigenetic signals in the maintenance and inheritance of heterochromatin domains in fission yeast. Genetics 190, 549–557 (2012).
17
Jia S., Noma K., Grewal S. I. S., RNAi-independent heterochromatin nucleation by the stress-activated ATF/CREB family proteins. Science 304, 1971–1976 (2004).
18
Kagansky A., Folco H. D., Almeida R., Pidoux A. L., Boukaba A., Simmer F., Urano T., Hamilton G. L., Allshire R. C., Synthetic heterochromatin bypasses RNAi and centromeric repeats to establish functional centromeres. Science 324, 1716–1719 (2009).
19
Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials on Science Online.
20
Sakuno T., Tada K., Watanabe Y., Kinetochore geometry defined by cohesion within the centromere. Nature 458, 852–858 (2009).
21
Kim S. M., Huberman J. A., Regulation of replication timing in fission yeast. EMBO J. 20, 6115–6126 (2001).
22
Tsukada Y., Fang J., Erdjument-Bromage H., Warren M. E., Borchers C. H., Tempst P., Zhang Y., Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins. Nature 439, 811–816 (2006).
23
Shi Y., Lan F., Matson C., Mulligan P., Whetstine J. R., Cole P. A., Casero R. A., Shi Y., Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell 119, 941–953 (2004).
24
Zofall M., Grewal S. I. S., Swi6/HP1 recruits a JmjC domain protein to facilitate transcription of heterochromatic repeats. Mol. Cell 22, 681–692 (2006).
25
Ayoub N., Noma K., Isaac S., Kahan T., Grewal S. I., Cohen A., A novel jmjC domain protein modulates heterochromatization in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 4356–4370 (2003).
26
Zofall M., Yamanaka S., Reyes-Turcu F. E., Zhang K., Rubin C., Grewal S. I., RNA elimination machinery targeting meiotic mRNAs promotes facultative heterochromatin formation. Science 335, 96–100 (2012).
27
Trewick S. C., Minc E., Antonelli R., Urano T., Allshire R. C., The JmjC domain protein Epe1 prevents unregulated assembly and disassembly of heterochromatin. EMBO J. 26, 4670–4682 (2007).
28
Braun S., Garcia J. F., Rowley M., Rougemaille M., Shankar S., Madhani H. D., The Cul4-Ddb1Cdt2 ubiquitin ligase inhibits invasion of a boundary-associated antisilencing factor into heterochromatin. Cell 144, 41–54 (2011).
29
Baba A., Ohtake F., Okuno Y., Yokota K., Okada M., Imai Y., Ni M., Meyer C. A., Igarashi K., Kanno J., Brown M., Kato S., PKA-dependent regulation of the histone lysine demethylase complex PHF2-ARID5B. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 668–675 (2011).
30
Chen E. S., Zhang K., Nicolas E., Cam H. P., Zofall M., Grewal S. I., Cell cycle control of centromeric repeat transcription and heterochromatin assembly. Nature 451, 734–737 (2008).
31
Kloc A., Zaratiegui M., Nora E., Martienssen R., RNA interference guides histone modification during the S phase of chromosomal replication. Curr. Biol. 18, 490–495 (2008).
32
Verzijlbergen K. F., Menendez-Benito V., van Welsem T., van Deventer S. J., Lindstrom D. L., Ovaa H., Neefjes J., Gottschling D. E., van Leeuwen F., Recombination-induced tag exchange to track old and new proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 64–68 (2010).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 348 | Issue 6230
3 April 2015

Submission history

Received: 1 September 2014
Accepted: 26 January 2015
Published in print: 3 April 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank I. Stancheva and the Allshire lab for valuable discussions; E. S. Choi for RNA-seq data; and S. Grewal, F. van Leeuwen, L. Bayne, Y. Shi, H. D. Madhani, T. Urano, and H. Watanabe for providing strains and materials. P.N.C.B.A. was supported by the Wellcome Trust 4 Year PhD program in Cell Biology (grant 093852). R.C.A. is supported by a Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellowship (grant 095021), the EC-NOE-EpiGeneSys (grant HEALTH-F4-2010-257082), and core funding to the Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology (grant 092076). RNA-seq data have been deposited with the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus under accession code SRX689922.

Authors

Affiliations

Pauline N. C. B. Audergon
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology and Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, Scotland, UK.
Sandra Catania
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology and Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, Scotland, UK.
Present address: Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Alexander Kagansky
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology and Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, Scotland, UK.
Present address: Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Pin Tong
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology and Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, Scotland, UK.
Manu Shukla
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology and Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, Scotland, UK.
Alison L. Pidoux
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology and Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, Scotland, UK.
Robin C. Allshire [email protected]
Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology and Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, Scotland, UK.

Notes

Present address: Medical Research Council (MRC) Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK.
‡Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Programmed suppression of oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial function by gestational alcohol exposure correlate with widespread increases in H3K9me2 that do not suppress transcription, Epigenetics & Chromatin, 14, 1, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-021-00403-w
    Crossref
  2. A composite DNA element that functions as a maintainer required for epigenetic inheritance of heterochromatin, Molecular Cell, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.07.017
    Crossref
  3. Empirical evidence for epigenetic inheritance driving evolutionary adaptation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376, 1826, (20200121), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0121
    Crossref
  4. Establishment of heterochromatin in domain-size-dependent bursts, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, 15, (e2022887118), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022887118
    Crossref
  5. Preventing phenotypic plasticity in cancer to mitigate therapy resistance, Biological Mechanisms and the Advancing Approaches to Overcoming Cancer Drug Resistance, (119-160), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821310-0.00002-4
    Crossref
  6. Parental nucleosome segregation and the inheritance of cellular identity, Nature Reviews Genetics, 22, 6, (379-392), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-00312-w
    Crossref
  7. Spreading and epigenetic inheritance of heterochromatin require a critical density of histone H3 lysine 9 tri-methylation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, 22, (e2100699118), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100699118
    Crossref
  8. Genome-wide programmable transcriptional memory by CRISPR-based epigenome editing, Cell, 184, 9, (2503-2519.e17), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.025
    Crossref
  9. Silencing and anti-silencing mechanisms that shape the epigenome in plants, Genes & Genetic Systems, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1266/ggs.21-00041
    Crossref
  10. Heterodimerization of H3K9 histone methyltransferases G9a and GLP activates methyl reading and writing capabilities, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 297, 5, (101276), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101276
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media