Skip to main content
Advertisement
Main content starts here
No access
Policy Forum
Land Use

Cracking Brazil's Forest Code

Brazil's controversial new Forest Code grants amnesty to illegal deforesters, but creates new mechanisms for forest conservation.
Science
25 Apr 2014
Vol 344, Issue 6182
pp. 363-364

Abstract

Roughly 53% of Brazil's native vegetation occurs on private properties. Native forests and savannahs on these lands store 105 ± 21 GtCO2e (billion tons of CO2 equivalents) and play a vital role in maintaining a broad range of ecosystem services (1). Sound management of these private landscapes is critical if global efforts to mitigate climate change are to succeed. Recent approval of controversial revisions to Brazil's Forest Code (FC)—the central piece of legislation regulating land use and management on private properties—may therefore have global consequences. Here, we quantify changes resulting from the FC revisions in terms of environmental obligations and rights granted to land-owners. We then discuss conservation opportunities arising from new policy mechanisms in the FC and challenges for its implementation.

Access the full article

View all access options to continue reading this article.

Supplementary Material

File (1246663_soares_sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystem and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005); www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx.
3
Lees A. C., Peres C. A., Conserv. Biol. 22, 439 (2008).
4
Rodrigues R., et al., For. Ecol. Manage. 261, 1605 (2011).
5
Ribeiro M., et al., Biol. Conserv. 142, 1141 (2009).
6
Cury R., Carvalho O., Manual para restauro florestal: Florestas de transição (IPAM, Canarana, 2011).
7
Stickler C. M., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 9601 (2013).
9
Rajão R., et al., Public Adm. Dev. 32, 229 (2012).
10
Aliança da Terra, aliancadaterra.org.br.
11
Round Table on Responsible Soy Association, responsiblesoy.org.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Neither embedded figures nor equations with special characters can be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures and equations within eLetters in general. If a figure or equation is essential, please include within the text of the eLetter a link to the figure, equation, or full text with special characters at a public repository with versioning, such as Zenodo. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

ScienceAdviser

Get Science’s award-winning newsletter with the latest news, commentary, and research, free to your inbox daily.