Advertisement
Policy Forum
Economics

Behavioral Economics and the Retirement Savings Crisis

Science8 Mar 2013Vol 339, Issue 6124pp. 1152-1153DOI: 10.1126/science.1231320

Abstract

Many countries are facing a retirement savings crisis. In the United States, for example, the fraction of workers at risk of having inadequate funds to maintain their lifestyle through retirement is estimated to have increased from 31% to 53% from 1983 to 2010 (1). Roughly half of U.S. employees (78 million) have no access to retirement plans at their workplace (2). Fortunately, there are solutions to these problems. We simply have to change the choice architecture of retirement plans by utilizing the findings of behavioral economics research (3) and make such plans available to all workers. We describe a large-scale field demonstration of the potential impact of such research-based changes in how we save.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

File (1152.mp3)
File (1231320.benartzi.sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Munnell A. H., Webb A., Golub-Sass F. N., The national retirement risk index: An update (Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 2012).
2
Munnell A. H., Fraenkel R. C., Hurwitz J., The pension coverage problem in the private sector: An update (Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, 2012).
3
Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R., Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT, 2008).
4
Novy-Marx R., Rauh J., J. Finance 66, 1211 (2011).
5
Benartzi S., Lewin R., Save More Tomorrow: Practical Behavioral Finance Solutions to Improve 401(k) Plans (Penguin, New York, 2012).
6
Madrian B. C., Shea D. F., Q. J. Econ. 116, 1149 (2001).
7
Vanguard Group, How America Saves (Vanguard, Valley Forge, PA, 2012).
8
Thaler R. H., Benartzi S., J. Polit. Econ. 112, (suppl. 1), S164 (2004).
9
Kahneman D., Tversky A., Econometrica 47, 263 (1979).
10
Data provided by Aon Hewitt, which tends to focus on larger plans that are generally more innovative, so the numbers could be biased upward. By comparison, the Plan Sponsor Council of America reports in their 54th Annual Survey (19) that 46% of plans had automatic enrollment in 2011. Owing to confidentiality concerns, Aon Hewitt analyzed data on authors' behalf and only provided summary statistics displayed in the chart.
12
According to 2010 Department of Labor data (20), the pensions and investments universe of plan providers covers more than 90% of all plan participants in the United States.
13
Firms shared data on condition of anonymity, so data are stripped of identifying information.
14
Plan Sponsor Council of America, 55th Annual Survey, 2012; www.psca.org/55th_survey.
15
At the authors' request, a large-plan administrator calculated a median income of $62K and average income of $93K for 1.8 million contributing participants in its plans, which suggests that our calculation may be conservative.
16
Chetty R., et al., Active vs. passive decisions and crowd-out in retirement savings accounts: Evidence from Denmark (NBER Working Paper No. 18565, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 2012).
17
Volpp K. G., et al., JAMA 300, 2631 (2008).
18
Volpp K. G., et al., Health Serv. Res. 8, 272 (2008).
19
Plan Sponsor Council of America, 54th Annual Survey, 2011; www.psca.org/54th-annual-survey.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 339 | Issue 6124
8 March 2013

Submission history

Published in print: 8 March 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shlomo Benartzi* [email protected]
Professor and Cochair of the Behavioral Decision-Making Group, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Chief Behavioral Economist, the Allianz Global Investors Center for Behavioral Finance, New York, NY 10019, USA.
Richard H. Thaler
Ralph and Dorothy Keller Distinguished Service Professor of Behavioral Science and Economics, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Notes

*Author for correspondence. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Pension systems and the current account: An empirical exploration, Journal of International Money and Finance, 120, (102520), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102520
    Crossref
  2. Externalities, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, (2845-2850), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3
    Crossref
  3. Making more effective use of human behavioural science in conservation interventions, Biological Conservation, 261, (109256), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109256
    Crossref
  4. Behavioural insights teams in practice: nudge missions and methods on trial, Policy & Politics, 49, 1, (105-120), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1332/030557320X15840777045205
    Crossref
  5. Behavioral Economics as a Model to Improve Adolescent and Adult Vaccination, Clinical Therapeutics, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.07.009
    Crossref
  6. Does education improve financial behaviors? Quasi-experimental evidence from Britain, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 183, (481-507), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.01.002
    Crossref
  7. Mathematics, Psychology, and Law: The Legal Ramifications of the Exponential Growth Bias, SSRN Electronic Journal, (2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3804329
    Crossref
  8. Free-riding and cost-bearing in discrimination, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 163, (80-90), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.08.003
    Crossref
  9. The influence of maximizing on personal saving intentions, Personality and Individual Differences, 183, (111120), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111120
    Crossref
  10. Plant-Based By Default, One Earth, 4, 9, (1205-1208), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.007
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media