Advertisement

Abstract

The MESSENGER spacecraft began detecting energetic electrons with energies greater than 30 kilo–electron volts (keV) shortly after its insertion into orbit about Mercury. In contrast, no energetic protons were observed. The energetic electrons arrive as bursts lasting from seconds to hours and are most intense close to the planet, distributed in latitude from the equator to the north pole, and present at most local times. Energies can exceed 200 keV but often exhibit cutoffs near 100 keV. Angular distributions of the electrons about the magnetic field suggest that they do not execute complete drift paths around the planet. This set of characteristics demonstrates that Mercury’s weak magnetic field does not support Van Allen–type radiation belts, unlike all other planets in the solar system with internal magnetic fields.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

References and Notes

1
Ness N. F., Behannon K. W., Lepping R. P., Whang Y. C., Schatten K. H., Magnetic field observations near Mercury: Preliminary results from Mariner 10. Science 185, 151 (1974).
2
Simpson J. A., Eraker J. H., Lamport J. E., Walpole P. H., Electrons and protons accelerated in Mercury’s magnetic field. Science 185, 160 (1974).
3
Armstrong T. P., Krimigis S. M., Lanzerotti L. J., A reinterpretation of the reported energetic particle fluxes in the vicinity of Mercury. J. Geophys. Res. 80, 4015 (1975).
4
Andrews G. B., et al., The Energetic Particle and Plasma Spectrometer instrument on the MESSENGER spacecraft. Space Sci. Rev. 131, 523 (2007).
5
Before orbit insertion, MESSENGER completed three flybys of Mercury in 2008 and 2009. During these flybys, EPS detected no increases in particle intensity above instrumental background at any time during MESSENGER’s near-equatorial magnetospheric passages (15, 21). Fluorescent x-ray events seen by MESSENGER’s X-Ray Spectrometer (XRS) during the flybys indicated the presence of suprathermal plasma (tens of kilo–electron volts) electrons inside Mercury’s magnetosphere below the EPS energy-detection threshold (21).
6
Anderson B. J., et al., The global magnetic field of Mercury from MESSENGER orbital observations. Science 333, 1859 (2011).
7
Nittler L. R., et al., The major-element composition of Mercury’s surface from MESSENGER x-ray spectrometry. Science 333, 1847 (2011).
8
Peplowski P. N., et al., Radioactive elements on Mercury’s surface from MESSENGER: Implications for the planet’s formation and evolution. Science 333, 1850 (2011).
9
McIlwain C. E., Coordinates for mapping the distribution of magnetically trapped particles. J. Geophys. Res. 66, 3681 (1961).
10
The |B|,L system (9) for Mercury is well described by the offset dipole model (6), which gives |B| = M{3(ZM/R)2 + 1}1/2/R3 and L = R/{1 − (ZM/R)2}, where R=X2+Y2+ZM2 is the radial distance from the center of the magnetic dipole in a Cartesian coordinate system (X,Y,Z) co-centered with the planet; the dipole moment M is 195 nT – RM3 (where RM is Mercury’s radius); the vertical component ZM of the radius vector from the dipole is ZZ0, where Z is the component of the radius vector from the center of the planet normal to the planetary orbit; and the dipole offset Z0 is 484 km northward. Because of the small size of the magnetosphere and the distortion of the magnetic field from that of a dipole, the L parameter represents the equatorial crossing point for only L ≲ 2 but provides a useful indication of the approximate magnetic latitude of the field line threading the spacecraft even for L > 2.
11
The proximity of the largest events to Mercury’s magnetic equator could account for the fact that EPS detected no increases in particle intensity above instrumental background during MESSENGER’s three Mercury flybys in 2008 and 2009. All three flybys followed trajectories with closest approach on the nightside of the planet near the geographic equator, 484 km south of the magnetic equator.
12
Mauk B. H., Fox N. J., Electron radiation belts of the solar system. J. Geophys. Res. 115, A12220 (2010).
13
Zurbuchen T. H., et al., MESSENGER observations of the spatial distribution of planetary ions near Mercury. Science 333, 1862 (2011).
14
M. Hoshino, S. Zenitani, K. Nagata, Y. Takagi, in Energy Budget in the High Energy Universe, K. Sato, J. Hisano, Eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2007), pp. 108–118.
15
Slavin J. A., et al., MESSENGER observations of extreme loading and unloading of Mercury’s magnetic tail. Science 329, 665 (2010);.10.1126/science.1188067
16
S. M. Krimigis, E. T. Sarris, in Dynamics of the Magnetosphere, S. I. Akasofu, Ed. (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1979), pp. 599–630.
17
Sarris E. T., Krimigis S. M., Iijima T., Bostrom C. O., Armstrong T. P., Location of the source of magnetospheric energetic particle bursts by multispacecraft observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 3, 437 (1976).
18
S. P. Christon, J. Feynman, J. A. Slavin, in Magnetotail Physics, A. T. Y. Lui, Ed. (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD, 1987), pp. 393–400.
19
Baker D. N., Borovsky J. E., Burns J. O., Gisler G. R., Zeilik M., Possible calorimetric effects at Mercury due to solar wind–magnetosphere interactions. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 4707 (1987).
20
Siscoe G. L., Ness N. F., Yeates C. M., Substorms on Mercury? J. Geophys. Res. 80, 4359 (1975).
21
Ho G. C., et al., Observations of suprathermal electrons in Mercury’s magnetosphere during the three MESSENGER flybys. Planet. Space Sci., 31 January 2011 (10.1016/j.pss.2011.01.011).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 333 | Issue 6051
30 September 2011

Submission history

Received: 13 July 2011
Accepted: 5 September 2011
Published in print: 30 September 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments: We thank the MESSENGER team for the development, cruise, orbit insertion, and Mercury orbital operations of the MESSENGER spacecraft. G.C.H. thanks M. Johnson, L. Brown, and J. Vandegriff for graphics support. The NASA Discovery Program under contract NAS5-97271 to The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory and contract NASW-00002 to the Carnegie Institution of Washington supports the MESSENGER mission to Mercury. MESSENGER data are available from NASA’s Planetary Data System archive.

Authors

Affiliations

George C. Ho* [email protected]
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA.
Stamatios M. Krimigis
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA.
Office of Space Research and Technology, Academy of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece.
Robert E. Gold
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA.
Daniel N. Baker
Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80303, USA.
James A. Slavin
Heliophysics Science Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA.
Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Brian J. Anderson
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA.
Haje Korth
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA.
Richard D. Starr
Physics Department, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA.
David J. Lawrence
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA.
Ralph L. McNutt, Jr.
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA.
Sean C. Solomon
Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC 20015, USA.

Notes

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Pre-flight Calibration and Near-Earth Commissioning Results of the Mercury Plasma Particle Experiment (MPPE) Onboard MMO (Mio), Space Science Reviews, 217, 5, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00839-2
    Crossref
  2. Evidence for Water Ice Near Mercury’s North Pole from MESSENGER Neutron Spectrometer Measurements, Science, 339, 6117, (292-296), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1229953
    Abstract
  3. The Major-Element Composition of Mercury’s Surface from MESSENGER X-ray Spectrometry, Science, 333, 6051, (1847-1850), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1211567
    Abstract
  4. Future Missions Related to the Determination of the Elemental and Isotopic Composition of Earth, Moon and the Terrestrial Planets, Space Science Reviews, 216, 8, (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00736-0
    Crossref
  5. Kinetic Simulations of Electron Acceleration at Mercury, Magnetic Fields in the Solar System, (201-240), (2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64292-5_8
    Crossref
  6. Statistical Study of Mercury's Energetic Electron Events as Observed by the Gamma-Ray and Neutron Spectrometer Instrument Onboard MESSENGER, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 123, 6, (4961-4978), (2018).https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025339
    Crossref
  7. Electron acceleration by turbulent plasmoid reconnection, Physics of Plasmas, 25, 4, (042904), (2018).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011013
    Crossref
  8. MESSENGER Observations of Rapid and Impulsive Magnetic Reconnection in Mercury's Magnetotail , The Astrophysical Journal, 860, 2, (L20), (2018).https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aaca92
    Crossref
  9. Ices on Mercury: Chemistry of volatiles in permanently cold areas of Mercury's north polar region, Icarus, 281, (19-31), (2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.08.006
    Crossref
  10. Energetic Electron Acceleration and Injection During Dipolarization Events in Mercury's Magnetotail, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 122, 12, (12,170-12,188), (2017).https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024617
    Crossref
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share