
CREDIT: AAAS
When we mention women in Science and Engineering, it is often about the diminishing numbers, the lower pay, the many difficulties for women, and the personal sacrifices that women necessarily make. Perhaps, by focusing on the negatives, we are unwittingly persuading young women that science and engineering may not be the right careers for them. Why bother to join this profession?
There are many rewards. The wealthy parents of John Enders, a Nobel Laureate of the 1950s, could not believe that he was being paid to play in the laboratory. He had the freedom to be curious. Carol Reiss, a New York University professor, described this freedom to me: “It is the ability to ask questions and develop experiments to answer them, learning something new which no one else has previously found. Yes, I would definitely do it again. Science is a very rewarding and gratifying profession, not a job.” Moreover, scientific work contributes to furthering our understanding of the universe and our place in it. Scientists feel uniquely relevant.

CREDIT: ROBERT LEHMANN/GETTY IMAGES
In the past, women often received friendly advice to accept less demanding positions, such as research assistant or associate rather than that of professor. It was argued that taking such positions would give women the flexibility for domestic responsibilities and childbirth. Also, there would be no need to search for funding. However, many professors and directors set their own schedule for getting the job done. Financial responsibility may indeed be a hassle, especially now, but having that responsibility also means deciding how that money is spent. Assistants and technicians can be assigned the routine functions, giving additional flexibility to the laboratory chief. Except for teaching, academic scientists and engineers have great flexibility in scheduling, although this might mean working well into the evening hours and weekends. Few other jobs provide such flexibility.
Although time-consuming, teaching has special rewards. Another professor (Amy Cheng Vollmer, Swarthmore College) remarked to me: “Being a mentor—in the classroom [or] laboratory … has been the most rewarding—seeing former students become successful … and developing balance in their professional and personal lives.” Not often mentioned but taken for granted, scientists and engineers mainly interact with smart, capable individuals, making it a pleasure to work together.
Sometimes achieving “balance” is elusive for women. Many women feel they have to decide between a career and family. Rosalind Franklin and Barbara McClintock chose not to have children in favor of science. However, for women who can juggle the demands of a profession and a family, there are special rewards of motherhood. As a young investigator (Theresa Chang, Public Health Research Institute, University of Medicine and Dentistry, New Jersey) told me, “many female colleagues … chose not to have children to be competitive. Having children is the best thing that I have done. I am more effective at work and integrate my skill and knowledge into the society through my involvement in the school.” To be a mother and a scientist is well worth the effort.
And should it be that after training, a woman decides that academic life is not for her, that training provides an open door to a wide variety of options. Scientists are prepared to solve problems, almost any kind. She can analyze new situations and immerse herself in learning about them. She is able to provide solutions and leadership. There are jobs in industry, on Wall Street, in government, in philanthropy, in administration, in national parks, in advocacy, in defense, and numerous others areas. There is nothing to lose and everything to gain. Yes, it is worth the bother!
Information & Authors
Information
Published In

Science
Volume 331 | Issue 6019
18 February 2011
18 February 2011
Copyright
Copyright © 2011, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Submission history
Published in print: 18 February 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Altmetrics
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
View Options
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
Download PDFGet Access
Log in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
- Become a AAAS Member
- Activate your AAAS ID
- Purchase Access to Other Journals in the Science Family
- Account Help
Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options
Purchase digital access to this article
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.







Women in Science: Ironic Bookends
We applaud the inspiring Editorial by A. S. Huang, which encourages women to pursue careers in science, and emphasizes the point that balance is indeed possible in one's personal and professional life ("Why bother?", 18 February 2011, p. 821). In our experience, the roles of parent and spouse are enriched by professional lives in science and academics. We believe the relative paucity of role models who have achieved balance is a major source of discouragement for young women contemplating careers in science.
It is painfully ironic that in the same issue, a 23-page supplement extolling a growing "legacy in the biosciences" at an international research center includes only two women among the 45 featured faculty. If one applies the mathematics inherent in the adage "A picture is worth 1000 words," then even Huang's powerful essay will be overwhelmed in the eyes of young women by the message contained within the photographs in the supplement (1).
It is especially ironic that on the page following the supplement, the AAAS booklet "Women in Science" is highlighted.
Robert N. Golden
Dean's Office and Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Shannon C. Kenney
Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Reference
1. AAAS/Science Business Office, Science 331, 932 (2011).