Advertisement

Abstract

We compared the amounts of learning achieved using two different instructional approaches under controlled conditions. We measured the learning of a specific set of topics and objectives when taught by 3 hours of traditional lecture given by an experienced highly rated instructor and 3 hours of instruction given by a trained but inexperienced instructor using instruction based on research in cognitive psychology and physics education. The comparison was made between two large sections (N = 267 and N = 271) of an introductory undergraduate physics course. We found increased student attendance, higher engagement, and more than twice the learning in the section taught using research-based instruction.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

File (deslauriers.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
R. J. Beichner et al., in Research-Based Reform of University Physics, E. F. Redish, P. J. Cooney, Eds. (American Association of Physics Teachers, College Park, MD, 2007).
2
Crouch C. H., Mazur E., Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. Am. J. Phys. 69, 970 (2001).Full Text (PDF)
3
J. E. Froyd, “White paper on promising practices in undergraduate STEM education” [Commissioned paper for the Evidence on Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education Project, The National Academies Board on Science Education, 2008]. www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Froyd_Promising_Practices_CommissionedPaper.pdf
4
J. E. Froyd, “Evidence for the efficacy of student-active learning pedagogies” (Project Kaleidoscope, 2007). www.pkal.org/documents/BibliographyofSALPedagogies.cfm
5
Hake R. R., Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. 66, 64 (1998).
6
Knight J. K., Wood W. B., Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biol. Educ. 4, 298 (2005).
7
Prince M., Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223 (2004). Full Text (PDF)
8
Springer L., Stanne M. E., Donavan S. S., Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A metaanalysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 69, 21 (1999).
9
Hestenes D., Wells M., Swackhamer G., Force concept inventory. Phys. Teach. 30, 141 (1992).
10
Deslauriers L., Wieman C., Learning and retention of quantum concepts with different teaching methods. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 7, 010101 (2011).
11
Ericsson K. A., Krampe R., Tesch-Romer C., The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol. Rev. 100, 363 (1993).
12
Smith M. K., et al., Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science 323, 122 (2009).
13
Ding L., Chabay R., Sherwood B., Beichner R., Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 2, 010105 (2006).
14
Adams W. K., et al., A new instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 2, 010101 (2006).
15
Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
16
Bloom B., The 2 Sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ. Res. 13, 4 (1984). Full Text (PDF)
17
Bauernfeind R. H., Olson C. J., Is the Hawthorne effect in educational experiments a chimera? Phi Delta Kappan 55, 271 (1973). Full Text (PDF)
18
Allen G. K., Wedman J. F., Folk L. C., Looking beyond the valley: A five-year case study of course innovation. Innovative High. Educ. 26, 103 (2001).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 332 | Issue 6031
13 May 2011

Submission history

Received: 16 December 2010
Accepted: 5 April 2011
Published in print: 13 May 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the University of British Columbia through the Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative.

Authors

Affiliations

Louis Deslauriers
Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ellen Schelew
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Notes

*
On leave from the University of British Columbia and the University of Colorado.
†To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]
This work does not necessarily represent the views of the Office of Science and Technology Policy or the United States government.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. The use of educational technology for interactive teaching in lectures, Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 62, (231-235), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.051
    Crossref
  2. Audience Response Systems Used as Information Retrieval Practice, How-to Guide for Active Learning, (101-105), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62916-8_8
    Crossref
  3. An Analysis of Anatomy Education Before and During Covid‐19: May–August 2020, Anatomical Sciences Education, 14, 2, (132-147), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2051
    Crossref
  4. THE FLIPPED CLASSROOM: MEDIA HYPE OR EMPIRICALLY BASED EFFECTIVENESS?, Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 79, 2, (312-332), (2021).https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/21.79.312
    Crossref
  5. Innovation of Curriculum and Frontiers of Fundamental Physics in Secondary School: Research-Based Proposals, Fundamental Physics and Physics Education Research, (101-116), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52923-9
    Crossref
  6. Design and implementation of an Arduino-based instrument for parabolic motion, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1763, 1, (012001), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1763/1/012001
    Crossref
  7. The Methodological Context in Higher Education, Handbook of Research on Barriers for Teaching 21st-Century Competencies and the Impact of Digitalization, (15-36), (2021).https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6967-2.ch002
    Crossref
  8. Reinvigorating electrochemistry education, iScience, 24, 5, (102481), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102481
    Crossref
  9. Interactive Metabolism, a simple and robust active learning tool that improves the biochemistry knowledge of undergraduate students, Advances in Physiology Education, 45, 2, (353-364), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00042.2020
    Crossref
  10. Electronic practicum module based on scientific argumentation as a practicum medium of motion and force in the covid-19 pandemic, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1760, (012003), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1760/1/012003
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS Log in

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media