Advertisement

Abstract

Protons and helium nuclei are the most abundant components of the cosmic radiation. Precise measurements of their fluxes are needed to understand the acceleration and subsequent propagation of cosmic rays in our Galaxy. We report precision measurements of the proton and helium spectra in the rigidity range 1 gigavolt to 1.2 teravolts performed by the satellite-borne experiment PAMELA (payload for antimatter matter exploration and light-nuclei astrophysics). We find that the spectral shapes of these two species are different and cannot be described well by a single power law. These data challenge the current paradigm of cosmic-ray acceleration in supernova remnants followed by diffusive propagation in the Galaxy. More complex processes of acceleration and propagation of cosmic rays are required to explain the spectral structures observed in our data.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

File (adriani.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Lagage P. O., Cesarsky C. J., Cosmic-ray shock acceleration in the presence of self-excited waves. Astron. Astrophys. 118, 223 (1983).
2
V. L. Ginzburg, S. I. Syrovatskii, The Origin of Cosmic Rays (Macmillan, New York, 1964).
3
Malkov M. A., Drury L. O.’C., Nonlinear theory of diffusive acceleration of particles by shock waves. Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 429 (2001).
4
Strong A. W., Moskalenko I. V., Propagation of cosmic‐ray nucleons in the galaxy. Astrophys. J. 509, 212 (1998).
5
Jones F. C., Lukasiak A., Ptuskin V., Webber W., The modified weighted slab technique: Models and results. Astrophys. J. 547, 264 (2001).
6
Donato F., et al., Antiprotons from spallations of cosmic rays on interstellar matter. Astrophys. J. 563, 172 (2001).
7
Amenomori M., et al., Anisotropy and corotation of Galactic cosmic rays. Science 314, 439 (2006).
8
Adriani O., et al., An anomalous positron abundance in cosmic rays with energies 1.5-100 GeV. Nature 458, 607 (2009).
9
Adriani O., et al., New measurement of the antiproton-to-proton flux ratio up to 100 GeV in the cosmic radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 051101 (2009).
10
Adriani O., et al., PAMELA results on the cosmic-ray antiproton flux from 60 MeV to 180 GeV in kinetic energy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 121101 (2010).
11
Grimani C., Experimental clues on pulsar energy losses and the role of circumpulsar supernova fallback disks. Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 235009 (2009).
12
Arkani-Hamed N., Finkbeiner D. P., Slatyer T. R., Weiner N., A theory of dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 79, 015014 (2009).
13
Kane G., Lu R., Watson S., PAMELA satellite data as a signal of non-thermal wino LSP dark matter. Phys. Lett. B 681, 151 (2009).
14
PAMELA comprises a number of high-performance detectors, capable of identifying particles through the determination of charge (Z), rigidity (R = pc/|Z|e, where p is the momentum of a particle of charge Ze, c is the speed of light, and e is the electron charge), and velocity (β = v/c, where v is the velocity) over a wide energy range. The device is built around a permanent magnet with a six-plane double-sided silicon microstrip tracker, providing absolute charge information and track-deflection (η = ±1/R, with the sign depending on the sign of the charge derived from the curvature direction) information. A scintillator system, composed of three double layers of scintillators (S1, S2, S3 in fig. S2) provides the trigger, a time-of-flight measurement, and an additional estimation of absolute charge. A silicon-tungsten tracking calorimeter, a bottom scintillator (S4), and a neutron detector are used to perform lepton-hadron discrimination. An anticoincidence system is used off-line to reject spurious event triggers generated by particles interacting in the apparatus. Respect to balloon-borne experiments, PAMELA has the advantage of a substantially longer period of uninterrupted observing time. Furthermore, taking data in space is not affected by environmental systematics such as those due to correction for secondary particles produced in the residual atmosphere that affects balloon-borne experiments. A more detailed description of PAMELA and the analysis methodology can be found in (32, 33) and in the SOM.
15
Gleeson L. J., Axford W. I., Solar modulation of galactic cosmic rays. Astrophys. J. 154, 1011 (1968).
16
J. P. Wefel et al., in Proceedings of the 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference, R. Caballero et al., Eds. (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, 2008), vol. 2, pp. 31–34.
17
Ahn H. S., et al., Discrepant hardening observed in cosmic-ray elemental spectra. Astrophys. J. Lett. 714, L89 (2010).
18
Asakimori K., et al., Cosmic‐ray proton and helium spectra: Results from the JACEE experiment. Astrophys. J. 502, 278 (1998).
19
Hareyama M. and RUNJOB collaboration, High energy galactic cosmic rays observed by RUNJOB experiment. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 31, 159 (2006).
20
Menn W., et al., The absolute flux of protons and helium at the top of the atmosphere using IMAX. Astrophys. J. 533, 281 (2000).
21
Boezio M., et al., The cosmic‐ray proton and helium spectra between 0.4 and 200 GV. Astrophys. J. 518, 457 (1999).
22
Boezio M., et al., The cosmic-ray proton and helium spectra measured with the CAPRICE98 balloon experiment. Astropart. Phys. 19, 583 (2003).
23
Haino S., et al., Measurements of primary and atmospheric cosmic-ray spectra with the BESS-TeV spectrometer. Phys. Lett. B 594, 35 (2004).
24
AMS Collaboration, Cosmic protons. Phys. Lett. B 490, 27 (2000).
25
Strong A. W., Moskalenko I. V., Ptuskin V. S., Cosmic-ray propagation and interactions in the galaxy. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57, 285 (2007).
26
The changing spectral characteristics of the proton spectrum between 30 and 230 GV may be partly due to heliospheric effects. Although solar-modulation effects are considered negligible above 30 GV in the spherical force-field approximation (15), more detailed models, which use the full Parker equation to describe the propagation of cosmic rays in a two- or three-dimensional heliosphere (34, 35), may be needed to fully understand the impact of this effect.
27
D. Caprioli, P. Blasi, E. Amato, Non-linear diffusive acceleration of heavy nuclei in supernova remnant shocks. Astroparticle Phys.; preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.1925 (2010).
28
Ellison D. C., Patnaude D. J., Slane P., Blasi P., Gabici S., Particle acceleration in supernova remnants and the production of thermal and nonthermal tadiation. Astrophys. J. 661, 879 (2007).
29
Zatsepin V. I., Sokolskaya N. V., Three component model of cosmic ray spectra from 10 GeV to 100 PeV. Astron. Astrophys. 458, 1 (2006).
30
Sanuki T., et al., Precise measurements of cosmic-ray hydrogen and helium spectra with BESS. Adv. Space Res. 27, 761 (2001).
31
Ahn H. S., et al., The energy spectra of protons and helium measured with the ATIC experiment. Adv. Space Res. 37, 1950 (2006).
32
Picozza P., et al., PAMELA – A payload for antimatter matter exploration and light-nuclei astrophysics. Astropart. Phys. 27, 296 (2007).
33
Casolino M., et al., Launch of the space experiment PAMELA. Adv. Space Res. 42, 455 (2008).
34
Jokipii J. R., Levy E. H., Hubbard W. B., Effects of particle drift on cosmic-ray transport. I - General properties, application to solar modulation. Astrophys. J. 213, 861 (1977).
35
Potgieter M. S., Solar cycle variations and cosmic rays. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 70, 207 (2008).
36
A. E. Vladimirov et al., preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.3642v1 (2010).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 332 | Issue 6025
1 April 2011

Article versions

You are viewing the most recent version of this article.

Submission history

Received: 18 October 2010
Accepted: 9 February 2011
Published in print: 1 April 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank P. Blasi, F. Donato, P. Lipari, and I. Moskalenko for helpful discussions concerning the interpretation of our results and D. Marinucci for helpful discussions on statistical methods. We acknowledge support from the Italian Space Agency, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, the Swedish National Space Board, the Swedish Research Council, the Russian Space Agency (Roscosmos), and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research.

Authors

Affiliations

O. Adriani
Department of Physics, University of Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
G. C. Barbarino
Department of Physics, University of Naples “Federico II,” I-80126 Naples, Italy.
INFN, Sezione di Naples, I-80126 Naples, Italy.
G. A. Bazilevskaya
Lebedev Physical Institute, RU-119991, Moscow, Russia.
R. Bellotti
Department of Physics, University of Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy.
INFN, Sezione di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy.
M. Boezio
INFN, Sezione di Trieste, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.
E. A. Bogomolov
Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, RU-194021 St. Petersburg, Russia.
L. Bonechi
Department of Physics, University of Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
M. Bongi
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
V. Bonvicini
INFN, Sezione di Trieste, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.
S. Borisov
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
Department of Physics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.
S. Bottai
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
A. Bruno
Department of Physics, University of Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy.
INFN, Sezione di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy.
F. Cafagna
INFN, Sezione di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy.
D. Campana
INFN, Sezione di Naples, I-80126 Naples, Italy.
R. Carbone
INFN, Sezione di Naples, I-80126 Naples, Italy.
Department of Physics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
P. Carlson
Department of Physics, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, and the Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova University Centre, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
M. Casolino
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
G. Castellini
Istituto di Fisica Applicata Nello Carrara, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
L. Consiglio
INFN, Sezione di Naples, I-80126 Naples, Italy.
M. P. De Pascale
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
Department of Physics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
C. De Santis
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
Department of Physics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
N. De Simone
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
Department of Physics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
V. Di Felice
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
A. M. Galper
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.
W. Gillard
Department of Physics, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, and the Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova University Centre, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
L. Grishantseva
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.
G. Jerse
INFN, Sezione di Trieste, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.
Department of Physics, University of Trieste, I-34147 Trieste, Italy.
A. V. Karelin
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.
S. V. Koldashov
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.
S. Y. Krutkov
Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, RU-194021 St. Petersburg, Russia.
A. N. Kvashnin
Lebedev Physical Institute, RU-119991, Moscow, Russia.
A. Leonov
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.
V. Malakhov
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.
V. Malvezzi
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
L. Marcelli
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
A. G. Mayorov
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.
W. Menn
Department of Physics, Universität Siegen, D-57068 Siegen, Germany.
V. V. Mikhailov
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.
E. Mocchiutti
INFN, Sezione di Trieste, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.
A. Monaco
Department of Physics, University of Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy.
INFN, Sezione di Bari, I-70126 Bari, Italy.
N. Mori
Department of Physics, University of Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
N. Nikonov
Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, RU-194021 St. Petersburg, Russia.
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
Department of Physics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
G. Osteria
INFN, Sezione di Naples, I-80126 Naples, Italy.
F. Palma
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
Department of Physics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
P. Papini
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
M. Pearce
Department of Physics, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, and the Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova University Centre, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
Department of Physics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
C. Pizzolotto
INFN, Sezione di Trieste, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.
M. Ricci
INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Via Enrico Fermi 40, I-00044 Frascati, Italy.
S. B. Ricciarini
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
L. Rossetto
Department of Physics, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, and the Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova University Centre, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
R. Sarkar
INFN, Sezione di Trieste, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.
M. Simon
Department of Physics, Universität Siegen, D-57068 Siegen, Germany.
R. Sparvoli
INFN, Sezione di Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
Department of Physics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata,” I-00133 Rome, Italy.
P. Spillantini
Department of Physics, University of Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
Y. I. Stozhkov
Lebedev Physical Institute, RU-119991, Moscow, Russia.
A. Vacchi
INFN, Sezione di Trieste, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.
E. Vannuccini
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Florence, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy.
G. Vasilyev
Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, RU-194021 St. Petersburg, Russia.
S. A. Voronov
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.
Y. T. Yurkin
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.
J. Wu
Department of Physics, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, and the Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova University Centre, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
G. Zampa
INFN, Sezione di Trieste, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.
N. Zampa
INFN, Sezione di Trieste, I-34149 Trieste, Italy.
V. G. Zverev
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, RU-11540 Moscow, Russia.

Notes

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]
On leave from School of Mathematics and Physics, China University of Geosciences, CN-430074 Wuhan, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Improvement of cosmic-ray proton measurement with the electromagnetic calorimeter of the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, Radiation Detection Technology and Methods, 5, 1, (90-94), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s41605-020-00222-9
    Crossref
  2. The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) on the international space station: Part II — Results from the first seven years, Physics Reports, 894, (1-116), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.09.003
    Crossref
  3. Positron excess from cosmic ray interactions in galactic molecular clouds, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 29, (1-18), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2020.11.001
    Crossref
  4. Intermediate-mass and heavy Galactic cosmic-ray nuclei: The case of new AMS-02 measurements, Physical Review D, 103, 12, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123010
    Crossref
  5. Probing the Sea of Cosmic Rays by Measuring Gamma-Ray Emission from Passive Giant Molecular Clouds with HAWC, The Astrophysical Journal, 914, 2, (106), (2021).https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abfc47
    Crossref
  6. Advances in direct measurements of cosmic rays, Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 78, 10, (923-931), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-021-00081-7
    Crossref
  7. Measurement of the Iron Spectrum in Cosmic Rays from to with the Calorimetric Electron Telescope on the International Space Station , Physical Review Letters, 126, 24, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.241101
    Crossref
  8. Red dwarf stars as a new source type of galactic cosmic rays, Astronomische Nachrichten, 342, 1-2, (342-346), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.202113931
    Crossref
  9. On particle acceleration and transport in plasmas in the Galaxy: theory and observations, Journal of Plasma Physics, 87, 1, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377821000064
    Crossref
  10. Measurement of the atmospheric muon rate with the MicroBooNE Liquid Argon TPC, Journal of Instrumentation, 16, 04, (P04004), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/16/04/P04004
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media