Advertisement
Education Forum
Education

Mathematics Teachers' Subtle, Complex Disciplinary Knowledge

Science24 Jun 2011Vol 332, Issue 6037pp. 1506-1507DOI: 10.1126/science.1193541

Abstract

What mathematical competencies must a teacher have to teach the subject well? This has proven difficult to investigate (1). A current view is that teachers' knowledge of mathematics “remains inert in the classroom unless accompanied by a rich repertoire of mathematical knowledge and skills relating directly to the curriculum, instruction, and student learning” (2). Unfortunately, there is no consensus on which “knowledge and skills” might activate teachers' inert knowledge. Two perspectives prevail, neither with a research base that enables strong claims about practice. The majority of current studies focus on explicit knowledge of curriculum content and instructional strategies. Such knowledge might be assessed directly through observation, interview, or written test (2), with a parallel research emphasis on the formal contents of teacher education programs [e.g., (3)]. A second school of thought, presented here, is that the most important competencies tend to be tacit, like skills involved in playing concert piano, learned but not necessarily available to consciousness.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

References and Notes

1
Ball D. L., Hill H. C., Bass H., Am. Educ. 29(1), 14 (2005).
2
Baumert J., et al., Am. Educ. Res. J. 47, 133 (2010).
3
Schmidt W. H., et al., Science 332, 1266 (2011).
4
Hiebert J., et al., Teaching Mathematics in Seven Countries: The Results of the TIMSS 1999 Video Study (NCES 2003-013, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2003).
5
Richland L. E., et al., J. Exp. Child Psychol. 94, 249 (2006).
6
Zook K. B., Educ. Psychol. Rev. 3, 41 (1991).
7
English L. D., Mathematical Reasoning: Analogies, Metaphors, and Images (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1997)
8
Lakoff G., Núñez R. E., Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being (Basic, New York, 2000).
9
Mazur B., Imagining Numbers (Particularly the Square Root of Minus Fifteen) (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2003).
10
Swetz F. J., From Five Fingers to Infinity: A Journey Through the History of Mathematics (Open Court Publishing, Chicago, IL, 1994).
11
Sfard A., Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2008).
12
Kaminski J. A., et al., Science 320, 454 (2008).
13
Davis B., in Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME), , Pinto M. M., Kawasaki T. F., Eds., Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 18 to 23 July 2010 (PME, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2010), vol. 1, pp. 63–82.
14
Recent research suggests a more complicated relation than has been assumed in earlier studies. See (2, 3).
15
Lakoff G., Johnson M., Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought (Basic, New York, 1966).
16
Ball D. L., Bass H., in Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group/Groupe Canadien d'Étude en Didactique des Mathématiques (CMESG/GDEDM), , Simmt E., Davis B., Eds., 23 to 27 May 2008, Sherbrooke, Canada (CMESG/GDEDM, Edmonton, Canada, 2002), pp. 3–14.
17
Ma L., Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers' Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1999).
18
Polanyi M., The Tacit Dimension (Doubleday, New York, 1999).
19
Davis B., Math. Teach. Middle Sch. 14(2), 86 (2008).
20
Schubert W., Curriculum: Perspective Paradigm and Possibility (Prentice Hall, New York, 1985).
21
English L. D., Ed., International Handbook of Research in Mathematics Education (Routledge, New York, 2008), chaps. 5 and 6.
22
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM, Reston, VA, 2000).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 332 | Issue 6037
24 June 2011

Submission history

Published in print: 24 June 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Brent Davis
Faculty of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.

Notes

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Growth of pedagogical content knowledge and ‘understanding mathematics in depth’: conceptions of pre-service teachers, Teacher Development, 24, 2, (165-183), (2020).https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1730944
    Crossref
  2. Number Work: Recovering the Original Complexity of Learning Arithmetic, Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Math Cognition, (99-118), (2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22537-7_5
    Crossref
  3. An international perspective on knowledge in teaching mathematics, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, (71-79), (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.05.002
    Crossref
  4. Jak nauczyciele i uczniowie rozwiązują zadania matematyczne, czyli o poprawnych i niepoprawnych rozumowaniach, Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji, 33, 2, (0-0), (2016).https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0009.4835
    Crossref
  5. Exemplary high school mathematics teachers’ reflections on teaching: A situated cognition perspective on content knowledge, International Journal of Educational Research, 78, (1-12), (2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.02.006
    Crossref
  6. The math teachers know: profound understanding of emergent mathematics, Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 2, (157-161), (2015).https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1035742
    Crossref
  7. Turning Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Social, Shifts in the Field of Mathematics Education, (139-150), (2015).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-179-4
    Crossref
  8. Mutual Expectations Between Mathematicians and Mathematics Educators, Mathematics & Mathematics Education: Searching for Common Ground, (57-71), (2014).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7473-5_5
    Crossref
  9. Profound understanding of emergent mathematics: broadening the construct of teachers’ disciplinary knowledge, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82, 2, (245-265), (2012).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9424-8
    Crossref
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media