Register and access this article for free
As a service to the community, this article is available for free.
Nitrous Oxide (N2O): The Dominant Ozone-Depleting Substance Emitted in the 21st Century
Unwelcome Dominance
Stratospheric ozone is depleted by many different chemicals; most prominently, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) responsible for causing the Antarctic ozone hole. Nitrous oxide is also an ozone-depleting substance that has natural sources in addition to anthropogenic ones. Moreover, unlike CFCs, its use and emission are not regulated by the Montreal Protocol, which has helped to reverse the rate of growth of the ozone hole. Surprisingly, Ravishankara et al. (p. 123, published online 27 August; see the Perspective by Wuebbles) now show that nitrous oxide is the single greatest ozone-depleting substance that, if its emissions are not controlled, is expected to remain the dominant ozone-depleting substance throughout the 21st century. Reducing nitrous oxide emissions would thus enhance the rate of recovery of the ozone hole and reduce the anthropogenic forcing of climate.
Abstract
By comparing the ozone depletion potential–weighted anthropogenic emissions of N2O with those of other ozone-depleting substances, we show that N2O emission currently is the single most important ozone-depleting emission and is expected to remain the largest throughout the 21st century. N2O is unregulated by the Montreal Protocol. Limiting future N2O emissions would enhance the recovery of the ozone layer from its depleted state and would also reduce the anthropogenic forcing of the climate system, representing a win-win for both ozone and climate.
Access the full article
View all access options to continue reading this article.
Supplementary Material
References and Notes
1
The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (1987).
2
The Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer (1985).
3
WMO (World Meteorological Organization), Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2006 (Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report No. 50, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007).
4
Wuebbles D. J., J. Geophys. Res. 88, 1433 (1983).
5
Crutzen P. J., Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 320 (1970).
6
Johnston H., Science 173, 517 (1971).
7
R. P. Wayne, Chemistry of Atmosphere (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, ed. 3, 2000), p. 775.
8
Chipperfield M. P., Feng W., Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1389 (2003).
9
Kinnison D., Johnston H., Wuebbles D., J. Geophys. Res. 93 (D11), 14165 (1988).
10
Randeniya L. K., Vohralik P. F., Plumb I. C., Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, (2002).
11
Solomon S., et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 1871 (1998).
12
Solomon S., Mills M., Heidt L. E., Pollock W. H., Tuck A. F., J. Geophys. Res. 97, 825 (1992).
13
Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
14
Portmann R. W., Solomon S., Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, (2007).
15
Mickley L. J., Abbatt J. P. D., Frederick J. E., Russell J. M., J. Geophys. Res. 102, (D19), 23513 (1997).
16
L. Thomason, Th. Peter, Eds. “Assessment of stratospheric aerosol properties (ASAP),” SPARC Report No. 4, www.atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca/SPARC/ASAP%v3c1.pdf (2006).
17
van Vuuren D. P., et al., Clim. Change 81, 119 (2007).
18
K. L. Benman et al., in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon et al., Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2007).
19
P. Smith et al., in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, B. Metz, O. Davidson, P. Bosch, R. Dave, L. Meyer, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2007).
20
L. Bernstein et al., in Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S B. Metz, O. Davidson, P. Bosch, R. Dave, L. Meyer, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2007).
21
Crutzen P. J., Mosier A. R., Smith K. A., Winiwarter W., Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 389 (2008).
22
Jin X., Gruber N., Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2249 (2003).
23
N. Nakicenovic et al., Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2008).
24
Velders G. J. M., Fahey D. W., Daniel J. S., McFarland M., Andersen S. O., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 10949 (2009).
(0)eLetters
eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Neither embedded figures nor equations with special characters can be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures and equations within eLetters in general. If a figure or equation is essential, please include within the text of the eLetter a link to the figure, equation, or full text with special characters at a public repository with versioning, such as Zenodo. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.
Log In to Submit a ResponseNo eLetters have been published for this article yet.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Science
Volume 326 | Issue 5949
2 October 2009
2 October 2009
Copyright
Copyright © 2009, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Article versions
You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Submission history
Received: 28 May 2009
Accepted: 12 August 2009
Published in print: 2 October 2009
Acknowledgments
We are extremely grateful to S. Solomon for helpful discussion, suggestions for improving the paper, and encouragement and also thank S. Montzka for helpful suggestions and S. Montzka and G. Dutton of the Global Monitoring Division/Earth System Research Laboratory for providing us with mixing ratio observations from which we could infer emission data for several ODSs in 2008 and for helpful discussions. This work was supported in part by NOAA’s Climate Goal Program.
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
- 3,773 citation in Crossref
- 2,945 citation in Web of Science
Altmetrics
Citations
Cite as
- A. R. Ravishankara et al.
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Cited by
- Enhanced N2O capture and reduction system using Cu/zeolite adsorbent and Pd/La/Al2O3 catalyst under O2-CO2-rich conditions, Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy, 382, (125883), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125883
- N2O emissions fueled by eutrophication in a shallow lake, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 160, (166-173), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2025.03.065
- Activation of coal gangue for catalytic decomposition of inert long-lived greenhouse gas nitrogen oxide, Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy, 381, (125874), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125874
- Site-specific effects of nitrification inhibitors on N2O emissions from manure and urea ammonium nitrate, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 396, (110014), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.110014
- Intermittent rivers in peri‑urban areas act as significant but overlooked sources of N2O emissions, Water Research, 288, (124775), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124775
- Global grain crops non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential integrating food security and climate change scenarios, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 224, (108543), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108543
- An improved open-top dynamic chambers method for measuring the exchange fluxes of N2O, NO and NH3 from farmland, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 159, (535-545), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2025.03.021
- Monitoring, characterization, and mitigation of nitrous oxide emissions from Chinese orchards, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 395, (109925), (2026).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109925
- Bioremediation of agricultural nitrate pollution – challenges and opportunities, Water Research X, 29, (100410), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2025.100410
- Nitrogen cycling blocked in constructed wetlands: Mechanisms, developments, and challenges—A review, Water Research X, 29, (100401), (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2025.100401
- See more
Loading...
View Options
Log in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
More options
Register for free to read this article
As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.
