Advertisement

Abstract

Conventional magnetic resonance methods that provide interior temperature profiles, which find use in clinical applications such as hyperthermic therapy, can develop inaccuracies caused by the inherently inhomogeneous magnetic field within tissues or by probe dynamics, and work poorly in important applications such as fatty tissues. We present a magnetic resonance method that is suitable for imaging temperature in a wide range of environments. It uses the inherently sharp resonances of intermolecular zero-quantum coherences, in this case flipping up a water spin while flipping down a nearby fat spin. We show that this method can rapidly and accurately assign temperatures in vivo on an absolute scale.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

References and Notes

1
B. Contiet al., Science314, 825 (2006).
2
J. Overgaard, in Hyperthermic Oncology, vol. 2, J. Overgaard, Ed. (Taylor & Francis, London, 1985), pp. 325–338.
3
J. Van der Zee, Ann. Oncol.13, 1173 (2002).
4
E. L. Joneset al., J. Clin. Oncol.23, 3079 (2005).
5
P. Wustet al., Lancet3, 487 (2002).
6
T. Hehr, P. Wust, M. Bamberg, W. Budach, Oncologie26, 295 (2003).
7
G. P. Raaphorst, in An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Clinical Hyperthermia, S. B. Field, J. W. Hand, Eds. (Taylor & Francis, London, 1990), pp. 10–54.
8
M. B Yatvin, J. N. Weinstein, W. H. Dennis, R. Blumenthal, Science202, 1290 (1978).
9
G. Kong, R. D. Braun, M. W. Dewhirst, Cancer Res.60, 4440 (2000).
10
M. H. Gaberet al., Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.36, 1177 (1996).
11
D. Needham, G. Anyarambhatla, G. Kong, M. W. Dewhirst, Cancer Res.60, 1197 (2000).
12
M. Dewhirstet al., Int. J. Hyperthermia21, 779 (2005).
13
W. S. Warren, W. Richter, A. H. Andreotti, B. T. Farmer II, Science262, 2005 (1993).
14
Q. He, W. Richter, S. Vathyam, W. S. Warren, J. Chem. Phys.98, 6779 (1993).
15
S. Lee, W. Richter, S. Vathyam, W. S. Warren, J. Chem. Phys.105, 874 (1996).
16
S. Vathyam, S. Lee, W. S. Warren, Science272, 92 (1996).
17
Y.-Y. Lin, N. Lisitza, S. Ahn, W. S. Warren, Science290, 118 (2000).
18
C. Faber, D. Balla, J. Magn. Reson.161, 265 (2003).
19
G. Galiana, R. T. Branca, W. S. Warren, J. Am. Chem. Soc.127, 17574 (2005).
20
Z. Chen, Z. Z. Chen, J. H. Zhong, J. Am. Chem. Soc.126, 446 (2004).
21
Y. Y. Linet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 3732 (2000).
22
B. Denis de Senneville, B. Quesson, C. T. W. Moonen, Int. J. Hyperthermia21, 515 (2005).
23
J. Gellermannet al., Int. J. Hyperthermia21, 497 (2005).
24
Y. Ishiharaet al., Magn. Reson. Med.34, 814 (1995).
25
J. Hindman, J. Chem. Phys.44, 4582 (1966).
26
N. McDannoldet al., Radiology230, 743 (2004).
27
S. K. Hekmatyar, P. Hopewell, S. K. Pakin, A. Babsky, N. Bansal, Magn. Reson. Med.53, 294 (2005).
28
C. Li, X. Pan, Q. Zhang, K. Ying, Proc. Intl. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med.15, 3372 (2007).
29
V. Riekeet al., Magn. Reson. Med.51, 1223 (2004).
30
K. Kurodaet al., Magn. Reson. Med.43, 220 (2000).
31
R. D. Peters, R. S. Hinks, R. M. Henkelman, Magn. Reson. Med.41, 909 (1999).
32
A. Bosset al., J. Magn. Reson. Imaging22, 813 (2005).
33
A. Abragam, The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism (Clarendon, Oxford, 1961).
34
Susceptibility changes that occur over the correlation distance, typically tens of microns, still do contribute to the iZQC linewidths. However, in almost any realistic samples, susceptibility changes that occur over this distance are necessarily far smaller than those seen across an entire voxel, leading to substantial line narrowing.
35
Although we use the iZQC nomenclature here, as discussed in (17), (27), and numerous other places, it is also possible in principle to calculate these effects using Bloch equations adapted to include a nonlinear term—the distant dipolar field—and this method is useful for numerical simulations. However, the nonlinearities in that picture dramatically reduce its intuitive value; for example, it is very hard to explain why peaks at the difference frequency are insensitive to inhomogeneous broadening.
36
This work was funded by NIH grants EB2122 and EB5979. We thank M. Dewhirst for useful discussions.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 322 | Issue 5900
17 October 2008

Submission history

Received: 14 July 2008
Accepted: 5 September 2008
Published in print: 17 October 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gigi Galiana
Department of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Imaging, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Rosa T. Branca
Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Imaging, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Elizabeth R. Jenista
Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Imaging, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Warren S. Warren*
Center for Molecular and Biomolecular Imaging, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Notes

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Two-Quantum 2D FT Electronic Spectroscopy of Biexcitons in GaAs Quantum Wells, Science, 324, 5931, (1169-1173), (2009)./doi/10.1126/science.1170274
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share