Advertisement

Postseismic Relaxation Along the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield from Continuous Seismological Observations

Science12 Sep 2008Vol 321, Issue 5895pp. 1478-1481DOI: 10.1126/science.1160943

Abstract

Seismic velocity changes and nonvolcanic tremor activity in the Parkfield area in California reveal that large earthquakes induce long-term perturbations of crustal properties in the San Andreas fault zone. The 2003 San Simeon and 2004 Parkfield earthquakes both reduced seismic velocities that were measured from correlations of the ambient seismic noise and induced an increased nonvolcanic tremor activity along the San Andreas fault. After the Parkfield earthquake, velocity reduction and nonvolcanic tremor activity remained elevated for more than 3 years and decayed over time, similarly to afterslip derived from GPS (Global Positioning System) measurements. These observations suggest that the seismic velocity changes are related to co-seismic damage in the shallow layers and to deep co-seismic stress change and postseismic stress relaxation within the San Andreas fault zone.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

File (brenguier.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
B. Allmann, P. Shearer, J. Geophys. Res.112, B04305 (2007).
2
J. E. Vidale, Y. Li, Nature421, 524 (2003).
3
Y. Li, J. E. Vidale, S. Day, D. Oglesby, E. Cochran, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.93, 854 (2003).
4
F. Niu, P. G. Silver, T. M. Daley, X. Cheng, E. L. Majer, Nature454, 204 (2008).
5
N. M. Shapiro, M. Campillo, L. Stehly, M. H. Ritzwoller, Science307, 1615 (2005).
6
M. Campillo, Pure Appl. Geophys.163, 475 (2006).
7
C. Sens-Schönfelder, U. Wegler, Geophys. Res. Lett.33, L21302 (2006).
8
U. Wegler, C. Sens-Schönfelder, Geophys. J. Int.168, 1029 (2007).
9
F. Brenguieret al., Nat. Geosci.1, 126 (2008).
10
More details concerning the Parkfield HRSN can be found at http://seismo.berkeley.edu/bdsn/hrsn.overview.html.
11
F. Brenguier, N. M. Shapiro, M. Campillo, A. Nercessian, V. Ferrazzini, Geophys. Res. Lett.34, L02305 (2007).
12
Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
13
G. Poupinet, W. L. Ellsworth, J. Frechet, J. Geophys. Res.89, 5719 (1984).
14
L. Stehly, M. Campillo, N. Shapiro, J. Geophys. Res.111, B10306 (2006).
15
S. Kedar, F. H. Webb, Science307, 682 (2005).
16
L. Stehly, M. Campillo, N. Shapiro, Geophys. J. Int.171, 223 (2007).
17
J. L. Rubinstein, G. Beroza, Geophys. Res. Lett.32, L14313 (2005).
18
More details concerning the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) deformation network at Parkfield can be found at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/parkfield/deform.php.
19
S. Ma, S. Custódio, R. Archuleta, P. Liu, J. Geophys. Res.113, B02301 (2008).
20
K. M. Johnson, R. Burgmann, K. Larson, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.96, S321 (2006).
21
A. Freed, S. Ali, R. Bürgmann, Geophys. J. Int.169, 1164 (2007).
22
I. Johanson, E. Fielding, F. Rolandone, R. Burgmann, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.96, S269 (2006).
23
R. M. Nadeau, D. Dolenc, Science307, 389 (2005); published online 9December 2004 (
24
K. Obara, Science296, 1679 (2002).
25
G. Rogers, H. Dragert, Science300, 1942 (2003); published online 8May 2003 (
26
J. Rubinsteinet al., Nature448, 579 (2007).
27
The digital elevation model (DEM) was obtained from the USGS National Map Seamless Server, http://seamless.usgs.gov.
28
J. F. Luis, Comput. Geosci.33, 31 (2007).
29
More details concerning the USGS GPS network at Parkfield can be found at http://quake.usgs.gov/research/deformation/twocolor/pkf_continuous_gps.html.
30
All of the data used in this study came from the Parkfield HRSN and were collected by the Berkeley Seismological Laboratory (BSL) with support from the USGS under grant 07HQAG0014. We are grateful to the BSL staff. We thank P. Bernard and J. P. Gratier for discussions, O. Coutant for providing us with the doublet analysis code, and G. Moguilny for maintaining the Cohersis cluster. We acknowledge the December 2007 joint BSL /IPGP workshop. This work was supported by Agence Nationale de la Recherche (France) under contracts 05-CATT-010-01 (PRECORSIS) and ANR-06-CEXC-005 (COHERSIS); by NSF under grants EAR-0537641 and EAR-0544730; and by USGS under grant 06HQGR0167. This is Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP) contribution no. 2393.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 321 | Issue 5895
12 September 2008

Submission history

Received: 27 May 2008
Accepted: 17 July 2008
Published in print: 12 September 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

F. Brenguier*
Sismologie, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP) and CNRS, 4 Place Jussieu, 15252 Paris, France.
Laboratoire de Géophysique Interne et Tectonophysique, Université Joseph Fourier and CNRS, 38041 Grenoble, France.
M. Campillo
Laboratoire de Géophysique Interne et Tectonophysique, Université Joseph Fourier and CNRS, 38041 Grenoble, France.
C. Hadziioannou
Laboratoire de Géophysique Interne et Tectonophysique, Université Joseph Fourier and CNRS, 38041 Grenoble, France.
N. M. Shapiro
Sismologie, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP) and CNRS, 4 Place Jussieu, 15252 Paris, France.
R. M. Nadeau
Berkeley Seismological Laboratory, University of California Berkeley, 215 McCone Hall, Berkeley, CA 94760, USA.
E. Larose
Laboratoire de Géophysique Interne et Tectonophysique, Université Joseph Fourier and CNRS, 38041 Grenoble, France.

Notes

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Connecting slow earthquakes to huge earthquakes, Science, 353, 6296, (253-257), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aaf1512
    Abstract
  2. Mapping pressurized volcanic fluids from induced crustal seismic velocity drops, Science, 345, 6192, (80-82), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1254073
    Abstract
  3. Continuous Permeability Measurements Record Healing Inside the Wenchuan Earthquake Fault Zone, Science, 340, 6140, (1555-1559), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1237237
    Abstract
  4. Under the Hood of the Earthquake Machine: Toward Predictive Modeling of the Seismic Cycle, Science, 336, 6082, (707-710), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1218796
    Abstract
  5. Monitoring reservoir response to earthquakes and fluid extraction, Salton Sea geothermal field, California, Science Advances, 4, 1, (2018)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.1701536
    Abstract
  6. Spatial and temporal seismic velocity changes on Kyushu Island during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake, Science Advances, 3, 11, (2017)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.1700813
    Abstract
  7. Monitoring southwest Greenland’s ice sheet melt with ambient seismic noise, Science Advances, 2, 5, (2016)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.1501538
    Abstract
  8. Monitoring transient changes within overpressured regions of subduction zones using ambient seismic noise, Science Advances, 2, 1, (2016)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.1501289
    Abstract
  9. Cascading elastic perturbation in Japan due to the 2012 Mw 8.6 Indian Ocean earthquake, Science Advances, 1, 9, (2015)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.1500468
    Abstract
  10. Nonvolcanic Tremor Evolution and the San Simeon and Parkfield, California, Earthquakes, Science, 325, 5937, (191-193), (2009)./doi/10.1126/science.1174155
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media