Comment on "Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services"
Abstract
Worm et al. (Research Articles, 3 November 2006, p. 787) reported an increasing proportion of fisheries in a “collapsed” state. We show that this may be an artifact of their definition of collapse as a fixed percentage of the maximum and that an increase in the number of managed fisheries could produce similar patterns as an increase in fisheries with catches below 10% of the maximum.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber?Sign In
References and Notes
1
B. Worm et al., Science314, 787 (2006).
2
We staggered the start time of the time series to mimic staggered entry of fisheries, where 5% of the time series were started each year until all of the time series were active in year 20. If our analysis is scaled so that year 0 is 1950, the average start date of a fishery is 1960. Worm et al. (1) found that the average time of a fishery starting in their analysis was 1962.
3
Catch data are often log-normally distributed. Chesapeake Bay fisheries, for example, had a median CV of 82% (5), and the median CV for fisheries aggregated at the ocean level was 72% (6), which is probably low relative to the variability of catch in the large marine ecosystems analyzed by Worm et al. (1), because catches were aggregated over larger areas. Generally, most fish populations are not thought to vary naturally by this amount (i.e., CVs of abundance would generally be lower), and some of this variability may be due to trends in catch rather than randomness. Our simulations used a mean of 1000, but the mean does not affect the results. Similar increasing patterns in the proportion of time series below a fixed threshold were obtained with time series of independent observations and with normal distributions, but the magnitude of the increase in collapses over time depended on the distribution, CV, and autocorrelation coefficient, with higher CVs and lower autocorrelation coefficients having a higher rate of increase.
4
The cumulative distribution function (CDF) for the maximum of a series of independent, identically distributed (iid) random variables is Fmax (y)= [F(y)]n, where Fmax is the CDF of the maximum of a series of n iid random variables with a CDF F. For any specified F, the longer the time series and higher the CV, the higher the maximum is likely to be, making it more likely that much of the time series will be less than a fixed percentage of the maximum. This is why more time series are scored as collapsed under the scenario with a higher CV. The maximum of a stationary time series has an equal probability of occurring in any single year. The overall increasing trend in collapses is due to patterns of when the maximum occurs in each time series because, by their definition, collapses can only occur after the maximum has been reached. Therefore, the probability of scoring a time series as collapsed is much higher at the end of a time series than at the beginning.
5
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Annual Commercial Landings Statistics, www.st.nmfs.gov/st1/commercial/landings/annual_landings.html.
6
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization Fishery Information, Data and Statistics Unit (FAO-FIDI, Rome, 2004), Collation, Analysis and Dissemination of Global and Regional Fishery Statistics. FI Programme Websites. Updated Monday, Oct. 9, 09:51:18 CEST 2006. Available through the Fisheries Global Information System (FIGIS) from www.fao.org/figis/servlet/static?dom=org&xml=FIDI_STAT_org.xml.
7
We thank D. Secor, J. Bence, G. Nesslage, and two anonymous reviewers for comments that improved this manuscript. This is contribution number 4090 of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Chesapeake Biological Laboratory.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In

Science
Volume 316 | Issue 5829
1 June 2007
1 June 2007
Copyright
American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Submission history
Received: 27 November 2006
Accepted: 30 March 2007
Published in print: 1 June 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Altmetrics
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Cited by
- Fishery Collapse Revisited, Marine Resource Economics, 36, 1, (1-22), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1086/711233
- Influence of Varying Dietary ω6 to ω3 Fatty Acid Ratios on the Hepatic Transcriptome, and Association with Phenotypic Traits (Growth, Somatic Indices, and Tissue Lipid Composition), in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar), Biology, 10, 7, (578), (2021).https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10070578
- Causal forest estimation of heterogeneous and time-varying environmental policy effects, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 103, (102337), (2020).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102337
- Abundance trends of highly migratory species in the Atlantic Ocean: accounting for water temperature profiles, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 75, 4, (1427-1438), (2018).https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy008
- A study of eight newly reported species of Chlorophyte and Eustigmatophyte, Korea, Journal of Ecology and Environment, 37, 4, (341-350), (2014).https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2014.036
- A comment on “What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries” (Froese et al. 2012), Marine Biology, 160, 7, (1761-1763), (2013).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-013-2183-y
- A new role for effort dynamics in the theory of harvested populations and data-poor stock assessment, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 70, 12, (1829-1844), (2013).https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0280
- The Extent of Novel Ecosystems: Long in Time and Broad in Space, Novel Ecosystems, (66-80), (2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118354186
- Citation Patterns of a Controversial and High-Impact Paper: Worm et al. (2006) “Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services”, PLoS ONE, 8, 2, (e56723), (2013).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056723
- What catch data can tell us about the status of global fisheries, Marine Biology, 159, 6, (1283-1292), (2012).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-1909-6
Loading...
View Options
Get Access
Log in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
- Become a AAAS Member
- Activate your AAAS ID
- Purchase Access to Other Journals in the Science Family
- Account Help
Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options
Purchase digital access to this article
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
Download PDF





