Integrity in International Stem Cell Research Collaborations
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber?Sign In
Supplementary Material
File (mathews.som.pdf)
References and Notes
2.
Hansen B., Med. Law23, 19 (2004).
3.
Wilmut I., et al., Science310, 1903 (2005).
4.
Public database (http://www.hinxtongroup.org/) in design stage.
5.
U.K.'s Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (http://www.hfea.gov.uk/).
6.
U.S. National Academy of Sciences (http://dels.nas.edu/bls/stemcells/).
7.
International hESCR Guidelines Task Force of the International Society for Stem Cell Research (www.isscr.org/scientists/guidelines.cfm).
8.
International Stem Cell Forum (www.stemcellforum.org/).
9.
(1992), p. 1990Country-specific sources that formed the basis for the table were as follows. Australia: Human Cloning Prohibition Act (2002); Research Involving Human Embryos Act (2002); National Health & Medical Research Council's Ethical Guidelines on the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in Clinical Practice and Research. China: Ethical Guiding Principles for Research on Human Embryonic Stem Cells (2003); The Guidelines on Human Assisted Reproductive Technology (July 2003), promulgated by the Ministry of Health. United Kingdom: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, Schedules 2 and 3; Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Disclosure of Information) Act(; Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Research Purposes) Regulations (2001). Germany: StGB (German Penal Code); Embryonenschutzgesetz—ESchG(1990; Stammzellgesetz—StZG (2002). Israel: Prohibition of Genetic Intervention (Human Cloning and Genetic Manipulation of Reproductive Cells) Law, 5759-1999 (this law was renewed, and slightly amended, in 2004, with the same sunset clause established for another 5 years); Report of the Bioethics Advisory Committee of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities: The Use of Embryonic Stem Cells for Therapeutic Research (2001); Public Health Regulations (1979).
10.
Supported by the Greenwall Foundation; the Wellcome Trust; the British Embassy in Washington, DC; and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Science
Volume 313 | Issue 5789
18 August 2006
18 August 2006
Copyright
© 2006 American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Submission history
Published in print: 18 August 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Altmetrics
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Cited by
- Yesterday’s Child: How Gene Editing for Enhancement Will Produce Obsolescence—and Why It Matters, The American Journal of Bioethics, 19, 7, (6-15), (2019).https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1618943
- How and Why to Replace the 14-Day Rule, Current Stem Cell Reports, 4, 3, (228-234), (2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/s40778-018-0135-7
- Research Translation and Emerging Health Technologies: Synthetic Biology and Beyond, Health Care Analysis, 26, 4, (310-325), (2016).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-016-0334-2
- Outreach and Engagement: Evolving Media and the Public Obligations of Stem Cell Science, Current Stem Cell Reports, 1, 4, (219-226), (2015).https://doi.org/10.1007/s40778-015-0023-3
- Who Cares about Consent Requirements for Sourcing Human Embryonic Stem Cells? Are Errors In the Past Really Errors Of the Past? , Accountability in Research, 18, 4, (250-288), (2011).https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.584763
- Proprietary Interests and Collaboration in Stem Cell Science: Avoiding Anticommons, Countering Canalyzation, Translational Stem Cell Research, (267-284), (2011).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-959-8_21
- Policy Uncertainty and the Conduct of Stem Cell Research, Cell Stem Cell, 8, 2, (132-135), (2011).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2011.01.002
- Policy Interoperability in Stem Cell Research: Demystifying Harmonization, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, 5, 2, (108-115), (2009).https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-009-9067-z
- Importing Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived at Another Institution: Tailoring Review to Ethical Concerns, Cell Stem Cell, 4, 2, (115-123), (2009).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.01.013
- Two Models of Commercializing Stem Cell Science: Creating Conditions for Collaboration?, SSRN Electronic Journal, (2009).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1437690
Loading...
View Options
Get Access
Log in to view the full text
AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.
- Become a AAAS Member
- Activate your AAAS ID
- Purchase Access to Other Journals in the Science Family
- Account Help
Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options
Purchase digital access to this article
Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.
Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.
View options
PDF format
Download this article as a PDF file
Download PDF