Advertisement

Abstract

The Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) assesses how people spend their time and how they experience the various activities and settings of their lives, combining features of time-budget measurement and experience sampling. Participants systematically reconstruct their activities and experiences of the preceding day with procedures designed to reduce recall biases. The DRM's utility is shown by documenting close correspondences between the DRM reports of 909 employed women and established results from experience sampling. An analysis of the hedonic treadmill shows the DRM's potential for well-being research.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

Supplementary Material

File (kahneman.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
M. Bergner, M. L. Rothman, Annu. Rev. Public Health8, 191 (1987).
2
S. Cohen, W. Doyle, R. Turner, C. Alper, D. Skoner, Psychol. Sci.14, 389 (2003).
3
M. Marmot, The Status Syndrome (Bloomsbury, London, 2004).
4
F. T. Juster, in Time, Goods, and Well-Being, F. Juster, F. Stafford, Eds. (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI, 1985), pp. 397–414.
5
P. van de Ven, B. Kazemier, S. Keuning, Measuring Well-Being with an Integrated System of Economic and Social Accounts (Department of National Accounts, Voorburg, Netherlands, 1999).
6
F. Y. Edgeworth, Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences (C. K. Paul, London, 1881).
7
D. Kahneman, P. Wakker, R. Sarin, Q. J. Econ.112, 375 (1997).
8
G. Dow, J. F. Juster, in Time, Goods, and Well-Being, F. Juster, F. Stafford, Eds. (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, 1985), pp. 397–413.
9
L. Flood, Household, Market, and Nonmarket Activities; Procedures and Codes for the 1993 Time-Use Survey (Uppsala Univ. Dept. Economics, Uppsala, Sweden, 1997), vol. VI.
10
A. Campbell, The Sense of Well-Being in America (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981).
11
F. M. Andrews, S. B. Whithey, Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality (Plenum, New York, 1976).
12
M. Csikszentmihalyi, R. E. Larsen, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis.175, 526 (1987).
13
A. A. Stone, S. S. Shiffman, M. W. DeVries, in Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, D. Kahneman, E. Diener, N. Schwarz, Eds. (Russell-Sage, New York, 1999), pp. 61–84.
14
M. D. Robinson, G. L. Clore, Psychol. Bull.128, 934 (2002).
15
R. Belli, Memory6, 383 (1998).
16
Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
17
A. A. Stoneet al.,J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.74, 1670 (1998). Respondents with high levels of job stress were recruited in New York (n = 88 men, 91 women; average age 40.0 years; 89% white; 58% married; 50% had some college). Situations and affect descriptors were similar to the DRM study.
18
K. N. Fortson, Monthly Labor Rev.127, 18 (2004).
19
We conducted an auxiliary random-digit-dial phone survey of 69 women, who ranked the activities from most to least enjoyable. Kendall's W coefficient of concordance among the ranks was 0.47, slightly higher than the concordance of economists' rankings of journals (20).
20
K. Axarloglou, V. Theoharakis, J. Euro. Econ. Assoc.1, 1402 (2003).
21
Thirty-nine job features (e.g., tenure and job level) were entered into a regression to predict duration-weighted enjoyment at work (16).
22
N. K. Semmer, S. Grebner, A. Elfering, in Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being, P. Perrewé, D. Ganster, Eds. (JAI, Amsterdam, 2004), vol. 3, pp. 207–263.
23
Twenty personal features (e.g., age and marital status) predicted duration-weighted enjoyment at work (16).
24
We computed enjoyment at home for respondents who reported “no problem at all” in keeping up “enough enthusiasm to get things done” during the last month and for respondents who reported “somewhat of a problem.” The difference between the groups spanned 46% of the enjoyment scale.
25
R. A. Easterlin, J. Econ. Behav. Org.27, 35 (1995).
26
P. Brickman, D. T. Campbell, in Adaptation-Level Theory, M. Appley, Ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1971), pp. 215–231.
27
The first question in the survey was “How satisfied are you with your life as a whole these days? Are you very satisfied, satisfied, not very satisfied, or not at all satisfied?”.
28
D. Kahneman, in Choices, Values and Frames, D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2000), chap. 38.
29
D. A. Schkade, D. Kahneman, Psychol. Sci.9, 340 (1998).
30
S. Lyubomirsky, K. M. Sheldon, D. Schkade, Rev. Gen. Psychol., in press.
31
G. Becker, Econ. J.75, 493 (1965).
32
D. Kahneman, A. B. Krueger, D. A. Schkade, N. Schwarz, A. A. Stone, Am. Econ. Rev.94, 429 (2004).
33
E. Diener, M. Seligman, Psychol. Sci. Pub. Int.5, 1 (2004).
34
This research was supported by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and also by the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton, the NSF, and the National Institute on Aging. Order of authorship is alphabetical. D.K. is affiliated with the Gallup Organization. A.A.S. holds equity in and is the Associate Chair of the Scientific Advisory Board of invivodata, Inc., a company that markets an electronic patient diary system.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 306 | Issue 5702
3 December 2004

Submission history

Received: 2 August 2004
Accepted: 30 September 2004
Published in print: 3 December 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Daniel Kahneman
Woodrow Wilson School and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Alan B. Krueger
Woodrow Wilson School and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Woodrow Wilson School and Economics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
David A. Schkade*
Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093–0093, USA.
Norbert Schwarz
Institute of Social Research and Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48106–1248, USA.
Arthur A. Stone
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794–8790, USA.

Notes

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. A Wandering Mind Is an Unhappy Mind, Science, 330, 6006, (932-932), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1192439
    Abstract
  2. Would You Be Happier If You Were Richer? A Focusing Illusion, Science, 312, 5782, (1908-1910), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1129688
    Abstract
  3. A neural mechanism for affective well-being: Subgenual cingulate cortex mediates real-life effects of nonexercise activity on energy, Science Advances, 6, 45, (2020)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.aaz8934
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS Log in

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media