Advertisement

Abstract

The genetic history of African cattle pastoralism is controversial and poorly understood. We reveal the genetic signatures of its origins, secondary movements, and differentiation through the study of 15 microsatellite loci in 50 indigenous cattle breeds spanning the present cattle distribution in Africa. The earliest cattle originated within the African continent, but Near East and European genetic influences are also identified. The initial expansion of African Bos taurus was likely from a single region of origin. It reached the southern part of the continent by following an eastern route rather than a western one. The B. indicus genetic influence shows a major entry point through the Horn and the East Coast of Africa and two modes of introgression into the continent.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (webhanotte.pdf)

REFERENCES AND NOTES

1
The taxonomy of the North African subspecies of the wild cattle or aurochs Bos primigenius, the ancestor of the domesticated cattle, is unclear due to large variation in osteological characters of the fossils. It is sometimes referred to in the literature as B. p. africanus, B. p. mauritanicus, or even B. p. opisthonomus. Consequently, here we stick to the species name of the ancestral species, B. primigenius.
2
K. C. MacDonald, in The Origins and Development of African Livestock: Archaeology, Genetics, Linguistics and Ethnography, R. M. Blench, K. C. MacDonald, Eds. (Univ. College London Press, London, 2000), pp. 2–17.
3
Wendorf F., Schild R., J. Anthropol. Archeol. 17, 93 (1998).
4
Bradley D. G., MacHugh D. E., Cunningham P., Loftus R. T., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 5131 (1996).
5
D. G. Bradley, R. Loftus, in The Origins and Development of African Livestock: Archaeology, Genetics, Linguistics and Ethnography, R. M. Blench, K. C. MacDonald, Eds. (Univ. College London Press, London, 2000), pp. 244–250.
6
C. Grigson, in The Beginnings of Agriculture, A. Milles, D. Williams, G. Gardner, Eds. (British Archaeological Reports International Series 496, Oxford, 1989), pp. 77–109.
7
MacHugh D. E., Shriver M. D., Loftus R. T., Cunningham P., Bradley D. G., Genetics 146, 1071 (1997).
8
Hanotte O., et al., Mol. Ecol. 9, 387 (2000).
9
F. A. Hassan, in The Origins and Development of African Livestock: Archaeology, Genetics, Linguistics and Ethnography, R. M. Blench, K. C. MacDonald, Eds. (Univ. College London Press, London, 2000), pp. 61–86.
10
A. Muzzolini, thesis, University of Provence Aix-Marseille (1983).
11
H. Epstein, The Origins of the Domestic Animals of Africa, vol. 1 (Africana Publishing Corporation, London, 1971).
12
F. Marshall, in The Origins and Development of African Livestock: Archaeology, Genetics, Linguistics and Ethnography, R. M. Blench, K. C. MacDonald, Eds. (Univ. College London Press, London, 2000), pp. 191–221.
13
J. E. O. Rege, C. V. Yapi-Gnaoré, C. L. Tawah, in Proceedings of the 2nd Africa Conference on Animal Agriculture, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa, 1 to 4 April 1996, H. H. Meissner, Ed. (South African Society of Animal Science, Irene, South Africa, 1996).
14
Supplementary details of experimental procedures and tables are available on Science Online at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/296/5566/336/DC1. Population allele frequencies are available from the corresponding author.
15
P. C. Nderito, K. O. Adeniji, Africa Distribution of Cattle by OAU/STRC (Inter Africa Bureau for Animal Resources, Nairobi, ed. 1, 1976).
16
The PC scores interpolation maps were drawn using the “Spatial Analyst Extension” of ArcView version 3.2 (Fig. 1, B through D), available at: www.esri.com/software/arcview/. The “Inverse Distance Weighted” (IDW) option with a power of two was selected for the interpolation of the surface. IDW assumes that each input point has a local influence that diminishes with distance. The area of sampling of each breed was used as geographic coordinates (Fig. 1A), and the six nearest neighbors were used for the calculation. Interpolation surfaces were divided into eight equal classes. The Madagascar Zebu population was excluded for the calculation of the continental African interpolation map.
17
C. Troy, thesis, Trinity College Dublin (2000).
18
Admixture coefficient mR, a least-squares frequency estimator (19), was calculated using the program Admix 1.0, available at: www.unife.it/genetica/Giorgio/giorgio.html. Mean values after 100 bootstraps were used (14).
19
Roberts D. F., Hiorns R. W., Hum. Biol. 37, 38 (1965).
20
Similarly, we observe a very high and significant correlation between PC1 values and the mean frequency of zebu-specific alleles (r = 0.96, P < 0.001), as well as between PC1 values and the average genetic distances (Da) with the Ongole, Nelore, and Sahiwal zebu reference populations (r = 0.96, P < 0.001).
21
The geographic coordinates of the African taurine Baladi (latitude, 29°03′11"; longitude, 30°59′76") and the African zebu Ogaden (latitude, 7°37′05", longitude, 46°22′80") were used as the reference point for the calculation of the distance from the Isthmus of Suez and the Horn of Africa, respectively. The median point (latitude, 23°20′0", longitude, 32°30′6") between the geographic coordinates of the taurine Baladi and the African zebu Butana (latitude, 17°70′75", longitude, 34°39′05") was used as the reference point for the origin of African pastoralism in the eastern Sahara.
22
Loftus R. T., et al., Mol. Ecol. 8, 2015 (1999).
23
J. Clutton-Brock, in The Archaeology of Africa: Food, Metals and Towns, T. Shaw, P. J. J. Sinclair, B. Andah, A. Okpoko, Eds. (Routledge, London, 1993), pp. 61–70.
24
J. R. Harlan, in The Archaeology of Africa: Food, Metals and Towns, T. Shaw, P. J. J. Sinclair, B. Andah, A. Okpoko, Eds. (Routledge, London, 1993), pp. 53–60.
25
J. L. Newman, The Peopling of Africa: A Geographic Interpretation (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT, 1995).
26
Gifford-Gonzalez D., Afr. Archaeol. Rev. 17, 95 (2000).
27
Regional dates used for correlation analysis involving the advent of cattle herding were as follows: eastern Sahara, 7800 BP; central Sahara, 7200 BP; northern Sahara, 5600 BP; West African river basins, 4000 BP; Ethiopia/Eritrea, 4800 BP; Great Lakes region, 3700 BP; Southern Africa, 1600 BP (9, 10, 26).
28
Smith A. B., Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 21, 125 (1992).
29
Also, we observe a very high and significant negative correlation between PC3 and the average frequencies of alleles present at relatively high frequencies in African taurine but not in the European–Near East taurine breeds (r = –0.65, P < 0.001).
30
Wade M. J., McCauley D. E., Evolution 42, 995 (1988).
31
Barbujani G., Sokal R. R., Oden N. L., Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2, 109 (1995).
32
Fix A. G., Hum. Biol. 5, 663 (1997).
33
The corrected index of diversity was the observed mean number of alleles (MNAO) minus the expected MNA (MNAE) given the estimated level of zebu introgression in each population. This was obtained by taking the average of 500 simulated samples from the Asian Bos indicus and European B. taurus reference populations in proportion to the fraction of zebu ancestry.
34
A. B. Smith, in The Origins and Development of African Livestock: Archaeology, Genetics, Linguistics and Ethnography, R. M. Blench, K. C. MacDonald, Eds. (Univ. College London Press, London, 2000), pp. 222–238.
35
J. Denbow Afr. Archaeol. Rev. 8, 139 (1990).
36
ILRI research is principally funded by program grants from the United Kingdom, Japan, The European Union, Ireland, and France, as well as unrestricted funding from other donors to the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). This project was funded in large part through a special grant from the African Development Bank. We thank C. L. Tawah, M. Stear, R. Loftus, D. MacHugh, C. Meghen, B. Sauveroche, S. Dunner (Retinta), L. R. Ritz, and C. Gaillard (Nelore and Ongole breeds); CIRDES (Baoulé) and the following people who coordinated the sampling in their respective countries: R. Mosi, A. M. Okeyo and M. Okomo (Kenya), Esubalew Abate (Ethiopia), P. Gwakisa (Tanzania), S. Maciel (Mozambique), J. Els (Namibia), K. Ramsay and A. Kotze (South Africa), O. A. El Khidir (Sudan), F. Mbuza (Uganda), W. N. M. Mwenya and G. B. M. Phiri (Zambia), S. Moyo and K. Dzama (Zimbabwe), V. N. Tanya and M. D. Achui-Kwi (Cameroon), L. Kamwanja (Malawi), U. Ghebremicael (Eritrea), K. Agyemang (ILRI-Nigeria), L. O. Ngere (Nigeria), R. Sow (Senegal), G. Kana (Chad), L. Gnaho (Benin), B. Fye (The Gambia), M. Diallo (Guinea), H. Djata (Guinea-Bissau), L. Ouragh (Morocco), R. Rakotozandrindrainy (Madagascar), and M.A.A. El-Barody (Egypt). The figures (maps) were drawn with the help of R. Kruska. Useful comments on the manuscript and/or support during the study were provided by H. Fitzhugh, D. Taylor, J. Gibson, D. MacHugh, J Clutton-Brock, D. Gifford-Gonzales, D. Desmond Clark, A. Teale, N. Pavitt, J. Bailey, M. Okomo, J. Rowlands, S. Nagda, S. Park, D. Mburu, and A. R. Freeman. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms. This is ILRI-publication 200164.

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 296 | Issue 5566
12 April 2002

Submission history

Received: 15 January 2002
Accepted: 5 March 2002
Published in print: 12 April 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Olivier Hanotte*
International Livestock Research Institute, Post Office Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya,
Daniel G. Bradley
Department of Genetics, Smurfit Institute, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Joel W. Ochieng
International Livestock Research Institute, Post Office Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya,
Yasmin Verjee
International Livestock Research Institute, Post Office Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya,
Emmeline W. Hill
Department of Genetics, Smurfit Institute, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
J. Edward O. Rege
International Livestock Research Institute, Post Office Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Whole blood transcriptome profiles of trypanotolerant and trypanosusceptible cattle highlight a differential modulation of metabolism and immune response during infection by Trypanosoma congolense, Peer Community Journal, 3, (2023).https://doi.org/10.24072/pcjournal.239
    Crossref
  2. High throughput analysis of MHC class I and class II diversity of Zambian indigenous cattle populations , HLA, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1111/tan.14976
    Crossref
  3. Genome-Wide Local Ancestry and Direct Evidence for Mitonuclear Coadaptation in African Hybrid Cattle Populations ( Bos Taurus/Indicus), SSRN Electronic Journal, (2022).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4055643
    Crossref
  4. Adaptation of the White Fulani cattle to the tropical environment, Journal of Thermal Biology, 110, (103372), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103372
    Crossref
  5. Mitonuclear incompatibility as a hidden driver behind the genome ancestry of African admixed cattle, BMC Biology, 20, 1, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01206-x
    Crossref
  6. De l'origine du chien et de sa diffusion à l'aune de sa mythologie, Anthropozoologica, 57, 7, (2022).https://doi.org/10.5252/anthropozoologica2022v57a7
    Crossref
  7. The genetic history of Mayotte and Madagascar cattle breeds mirrors the complex pattern of human exchanges in Western Indian Ocean, G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics, 12, 4, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkac029
    Crossref
  8. Genome-wide local ancestry and evidence for mitonuclear coadaptation in African hybrid cattle populations, iScience, 25, 7, (104672), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104672
    Crossref
  9. Assessing accuracy of genotype imputation in the Afrikaner and Brahman cattle breeds of South Africa, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 54, 2, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03102-0
    Crossref
  10. Genomic signatures for drylands adaptation at gene-rich regions in African zebu cattle, Genomics, 114, 4, (110423), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110423
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media