Advertisement

Abstract

Little is known about the phenotypic consequences of global climate change, despite the excellent Pleistocene fossil record of many taxa. We used morphological measurements from extant and Pleistocene populations of a marine gastropod (Acanthinucella spirata) in conjunction with mitochondrial DNA sequence variation from living populations to determine how populations responded phenotypically to Pleistocene climatic changes. Northern populations show little sequence variation as compared to southern populations, a pattern consistent with a recent northward range expansion. These recently recolonized northern populations also contain shell morphologies that are absent in extant southern populations and throughout the Pleistocene fossil record. Thus, contrary to traditional expectations that morphological evolution should occur largely within Pleistocene refugia, our data show that geographical range shifts in response to climatic change can lead to significant morphological evolution.
Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber?

REFERENCES AND NOTES

1
Working Group FAUNMAP, Science 272, 1601 (1996).
2
Roy K., Valentine J. W., Jablonski D., Kidwell S. M., Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 458 (1996).
3
Hewitt G. M., Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58, 247 (1996).
4
Price T. D., Helbig A. J., Richman A. D., Evolution 51, 552 (1997).
5
Klicka J., Zink R. M., Science 277, 1666 (1997).
6
J. C. Avise, Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000).
7
Valentine J. W., Paleobiology 15, 83 (1989).
8
Roy K., Jablonski D., Valentine J. W., Geology 23, 1071 (1995).
9
D. R. Lindberg, J. H. Lipps, in Evolutionary Paleobiology, D. Jablonski et al., Eds. (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1996), pp. 161–182.
10
Spight T. M., Nautilus 91, 67 (1977).
11
Gianniny G. L., Geary D. H., Veliger 35, 195 (1992).
12
Adult A. spirata were collected from high intertidal habitats between December 1999 and April 2000 by K.R. and/or D.P.B. at localities indicated in Fig. 1. A. paucilirata and A. punctulata were included as outgroups (20). Specimens were preserved in ≥70% ethanol and photographed for morphometric analyses, then crushed to extract tissue.
13
DNA was extracted from muscle tissue using cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) methods, removing polysaccharide polymerase inhibitors with PhytoPure resin (Amersham). We amplified the DNA using primers HCOI (39) and LCOI+ (5'-GTCAACAAAATCATAAAGATATTGGAAC-3') and standard polymerase chain reaction profiles with an annealing temperature of 50°C. Products were directly sequenced in both directions on an ABI 377 sequencer, using the amplification primers. There were no indels and only three nonsynonymous substitutions within A. spirata (singletons in the Half Moon Bay, Leo Carillo, and Carlsbad populations). Parsimony networks were obtained with the software TCS 1.01 (D. Posada). Relationships among the three clades revealed by networks were polarized by means of neighbor-joining and parsimony methods (40), with A. paucilirata and A. punctulata (GenBank accession numbers and ) as outgroups. Various weighting schemes produced the same results. Analysis of molecular variation (19) and pairwise mismatch analyses (22) were performed with Arlequin 2.000 (41) based on simple pairwise distances.
14
Bernardi G., Evolution 54, 226 (2000).
15
Valentine J. W., Limnol. Oceanogr. 11, 198 (1966).
16
Roy K., Jablonski D., Valentine J. W., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 3699 (1998).
17
Burton R. S., Evolution 52, 734 (1998).
18
Gaylord B., Gaines S. D., Am. Nat. 155, 769 (2000).
19
Excoffier L., Smouse P. E., Quattro J. M., Genetics 131, 479 (1992).
20
Marko P. B., Vermeij G. J., Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13, 275 (1999).
21
M. E. Hellberg, K. Roy, data not shown.
22
Slatkin M., Hudson R. R., Genetics 129, 555 (1991).
23
Hellberg M. E., Evolution 48, 1829 (1994).
24
Marko P. B., Evolution 52, 757 (1998).
25
Zink R. M., Barrowclough G. F., Atwood J. L., Blackwell-Rago R. C., Conserv. Biol. 14, 1394 (2000).
26
G. L. Kennedy, thesis, University of California, Davis (1978).
27
Estimates are based on a nucleotide divergence rate of 2.4% per million years in COI in other gastropods [
Hellberg M. E., Vacquier V. D., Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 839 (1999);
] and on coalescent analyses using FLUCTUATE (C. Cunningham, personal communication).
28
For living populations, morphological analyses were based on the same specimens as for sequence analysis; in a few localities, these were supplemented by additional specimens collected at the same time. Pleistocene specimens came from collections in the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the California Academy of Sciences. The total number of Pleistocene specimens (179) used was similar to the total of living specimens (161) in order to minimize sample size effects. Ten positional landmarks on each photographed shell (Fig. 3) were used to obtain eight measurements with the image analysis software ImagePro Plus. All measurements were collected by one of us (D.P.B.) to maintain consistency. Morphological measurements were log-transformed, and a principal components analysis (PCA) using a correlation matrix was used to generate the shape morphospace (42). Only specimens >1.4 cm in total length were analyzed to control for ontogenetic changes in shell shape. Measurements were not size-standardized, and all data were combined into a single PCA. The first four principal components explained 95.8% of the total variance (PC1 = 80.1%, PC2 = 9.7%, PC3 = 3.9%, and PC4 = 2.1%). A second PCA using a covariance matrix produced similar results. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) of the principal component scores was used to test for spatial and temporal differences in morphology (Table 2). Further details about the measurements and PCA results are available from the authors.
29
Pease C. M., Lande R., Bull J. J., Ecology 70, 1657 (1989).
30
Case T. J., Taper M. L., Am. Nat. 155, 583 (2000).
31
Smith F. A., Betancourt J. L., Brown J. H., Science 270, 2012 (1995).
32
Hadly E. A., Kohn M. H., Leonard J. A., Wayne R. K., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 6893 (1998).
33
Chiba S., Paleobiology 24, 99 (1998).
34
Haffer J., Science 165, 131 (1969).
35
Losos J. B., Warhelt K. I., Schoener T. W., Nature 386, 70 (1997).
36
Huey R. B., Gilchrist G.W., Carlson M. L., Berrigan D., Serra L., Science 287, 308 (2000).
37
M. A. Bell, C. A. Andrews, in Evolutionary Ecology of Freshwater Animals, B. Streit, T. Städler, C. M. Lively, Eds. (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, 1997), pp. 323–363.
38
Rundle H. D., Nagel L., Boughman J. W., Schluter D., Science 287, 306 (2000).
39
Folmer O., Black M., Hoeh W., Lutz R., Vrijenhoek R., Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3, 294 (1994).
40
D. L. Swofford, PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), version 4.062a (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1998).
41
S. Schneider, D. Roessli, L. Excoffier, Arlequin: A Software for Population Genetics Data Analysis, version 2.000 (Genetics and Biometry Lab, Department of Anthropology, Univ. of Geneva, Switzerland, 2000).
42
Roy K., Foote M., Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 277 (1997).
43
M. Nei, Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1987).
44
Tajima F., Genetics 105, 437 (1983).
45
We thank C. Cunningham, D. Jablonski, J. R. Kohn, R. Lande, P. Marko, J. Neigel, M. Noor, T. D. Price, M. Taylor, J. W. Valentine, J. Wares, and two anonymous reviewers for comments and/or discussions; P. Arbour-Reily and N. Crochet for technical help; and J. H. McLean, L. T. Groves (Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County), and P. D. Roopnarine (California Academy of Sciences) for access to museum collections and specimen loans. Supported by NSF grants (K.R. and M.E.H.).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 292 | Issue 5522
1 June 2001

Submission history

Received: 22 February 2001
Accepted: 25 April 2001
Published in print: 1 June 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michael E. Hellberg*
Department of Biological Sciences, 508 Life Sciences Building, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Deborah P. Balch
Section of Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, Division of Biology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093–0116, USA.
Kaustuv Roy*,
Section of Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, Division of Biology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093–0116, USA.

Notes

*
These authors contributed equally to this work.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage
Altmetrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by
  1. Local Selection and Latitudinal Variation in a Marine Predator-Prey Interaction, Science, 300, 5622, (1135-1137), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1083437
    Abstract
  2. Climate Change, Human Impacts, and the Resilience of Coral Reefs, Science, 301, 5635, (929-933), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1085046
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Get Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.
More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media