To identify synthetic lethal interactions with
CA9, we knocked the gene out in SUM159PT TNBC cells using CRISPR-Cas9 (fig. S1, A to C). We then screened the genome-wide GeCKO lentiCRISPRv2 library A consisting of 65,383 single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) targeting 19,050 genes in a dropout screen to identify synthetic lethal interactions (
Fig. 1A). Control cells expressing a nontargeting sgRNA (NTC) and
CA9 (
carbonic anhydrase IX) knockout (KO) (
CA9KO) cells were maintained in 1% O
2 following transduction with the lentiviral library and passaged for 20 generations to allow adequate gene dropout time. Changes in sgRNA abundance corresponding to each gene between the initial (
T0) and the final time point (
T11; representing 20 generations) were determined by next-generation sequencing. We identified 762 statistically significant hits that we classified by biological function using gene ontology (
Fig. 1B and table S1). Among the significantly enriched processes affected by loss of
CA9 were RNA metabolism, nonsense-mediated decay, ribosomal RNA processing, selenocysteine synthesis, selenoamino acid metabolism, tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and electron transport pathways (
Fig. 1B and fig. S1D). Further refining the
CA9 synthetic lethal interactions into a network of functional pathways exposed vulnerable gene networks associated with cytoskeleton, cell cycle and mitosis, ribosome biogenesis, RNA processing, mitochondrial organization, DNA damage repair (DDR) and nucleic acid (NA) metabolism, and redox homeostasis (
Fig. 1C). The redox homeostasis network is particularly interesting, as CAIX function has not been previously linked to redox homeostasis. Among the genes we identified involved in redox homeostasis were thioredoxin (
TXN), glutathione
S-transferases (
GSTM2 and
GSTM5), glutathione reductase (
GSR), and the molybdenum cofactor (
MOCS3), all genes playing a critical role in antioxidant defense (
26). In addition, a set of genes involved in iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis including the cysteine desulfurase (
NFS1), iron-sulfur cluster scaffold protein (
ISCU), iron-sulfur cluster adapter protein (
ISCA2), adenosine 5′-triphosphate–binding cassette subfamily B member 7 (
ABCB7), and glutaredoxin 5 (
GLRX5) were identified (
27). Ranking hits according to their fitness score, one of the top synthetic lethal genes in the screen was
NFS1 (
Fig. 1D). NFS1 catalyzes the first step in the generation of iron-sulfur clusters, cofactors for proteins involved in a number of cellular functions, including the TCA cycle and electron transport chain, by removing the thiol group from cysteine generating alanine and a persulfide group on the scaffold protein ISCU (
28,
29). Moreover, NFS1 was recently implicated in protection from the iron-dependent, oxidative form of cell death, ferroptosis (
30). Given the evidence demonstrating that CAIX affects cellular metabolism and the abundance of enzymes involved in cell metabolism requiring iron-sulfur clusters as cofactors, we decided to pursue this synthetic lethal interaction (
29,
31–
35).
With little being known about the importance of
NFS1 expression across various cancers, we interrogated datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for
NFS1 expression. We identified a number of solid cancers where
NFS1 expression is elevated relative to normal tissue expression, including breast cancer (fig. S1E). Since the screen was carried out in a TNBC cell line, we took a closer look at the TCGA invasive breast cancer cohort after stratifying the patient population according to molecular subtype and identified
CA9 and
NFS1 expression that were correlated in the basal subtype (
Fig. 1E). Furthermore, patients with elevated
CA9 and
NFS1 mRNA expression in their tumors in this cohort survive for shorter periods (
Fig. 1F). To confirm the transcription data from the TCGA datasets extended to expression of the two proteins, we stained a small breast tumor tissue microarray consisting of triple-negative cases for CAIX and NFS1 (
Fig. 1G). We and others have previously shown that CAIX is highly expressed and is a marker of worse patient prognosis in breast cancer (
11,
14). CAIX was expressed in ~65% of the TNBC cases in this array, whereas NFS1 was expressed in nearly all cases (fig. S1F). These data suggest that both CAIX and NFS1 are expressed in a subset of patients with breast cancer where cotargeting may be beneficial.