Preexisting and de novo humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in humans

Antibodies predating infection Immunological memory after infection with seasonal human coronaviruses (hCoVs) may potentially contribute to cross-protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Ng et al. report that in a cohort of 350 SARS-CoV-2–uninfected individuals, a small proportion had circulating immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies that could cross-react with the S2 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (see the Perspective by Guthmiller and Wilson). By contrast, COVID-19 patients generated IgA, IgG, and IgM antibodies that recognized both the S1 and S2 subunits. The anti-S2 antibodies from SARS-CoV-2–uninfected patients showed specific neutralizing activity against both SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-2 S pseudotypes. A much higher percentage of SARS-CoV-2–uninfected children and adolescents were positive for these antibodies compared with adults. This pattern may be due to the fact that children and adolescents generally have higher hCoV infection rates and a more diverse antibody repertoire, which may explain the age distribution of COVID-19 susceptibility. Science, this issue p. 1339; see also p. 1272

I mmune cross-reactivity among seasonally spreading human coronaviruses (HCoVs) has long been hypothesized to provide effective but transient cross-protection against distinct HCoVs (1,2). To determine the degree of cross-reactivity between HCoVs and SARS-CoV-2, we developed a flow cytometrybased assay for SARS-CoV-2-binding antibodies. The main target for such antibodies is the spike glycoprotein (S), which is proteolytically processed into the S1 and S2 subunits, mediating target cell attachment and entry, respectively.
The S1-specific CR3022 antibody stained a smaller percentage of SARS-CoV-2 S-expressing human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells and with lower intensity than COVID-19 convalescent sera ( fig. S1), indicating that polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies targeted a wider range of epitopes naturally processed and displayed on these cells. This assay also detected SARS-CoV-2 S-reactive IgM and IgA antibodies in COVID-19 convalescent sera ( fig. S2). Indeed, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 S-reactive antibodies of all three Ig classes (IgG + IgM + IgA + ) distinguished COVID-19 sera from control sera with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity ( Fig. 1A and fig. S3). All 156 seroconverted COVID-19 patients had contemporaneous IgG, IgM, and IgA responses to SARS-CoV-2 S throughout the observation period, with the exception of two patients who only had IgG antibodies (figs. S4 and S5). One of these patients was a bone marrow transplantation recipient who experienced HCoV infection 1 month before SARS-CoV-2 infection ( fig. S6). Unexpectedly, a small proportion of SARS-CoV-2-uninfected patients sampled before or during the early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the United Kingdom (table S1) also had SARS-CoV-2 S-binding IgG antibodies, but not IgM or IgA antibodies (Fig. 1A), suggesting the presence of cross-reactive immunological memory.
The S2 subunit exhibits a higher degree of homology among coronaviruses than S1 (fig .   S7) and was likely the main target of crossreactive antibodies. Competition with recombinant soluble S1 or S2 at doses that blocked binding of specific monoclonal antibodies ( fig. S8) did not affect the frequency of cells stained with COVID-19 patient sera, although the intensity of staining was reduced by 31 and 37%, respectively (Fig. 1, B to D), indicating recognition of both S1 and S2. By contrast, soluble S2 completely abolished staining with SARS-CoV-2-uninfected patient sera, whereas soluble S1 had no effect (Fig. 1, B to D). Thus, SARS-CoV-2-uninfected patient sera cross-react with SARS-CoV-2 S2, and COVID-19 patient sera additionally recognize S1.
SARS-CoV-2 S-reactive IgG antibodies were detected by flow cytometry in five of 34 SARS-CoV-2-uninfected individuals with HCoV infection confirmed by reverse transcriptionquantitative polymerase chain reaction, as well as in one of 31 individuals without recent HCoV infection ( Fig. 2A and fig. S4A). This suggested that cross-reactivity may have persisted from earlier HCoV infections rather than having been induced by the most recent one.
To confirm antibody cross-reactivity using an independent assay, we developed enzymelinked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) using recombinant SARS-CoV-2-stabilized trimeric S ectodomain, S1, receptor-binding domain (RBD), or nucleoprotein (N). Rates of IgG seropositivity by SARS-CoV-2 S1-coated ELISA were congruent with, but generally lower than, those by flow cytometry (fig. S9). The three SARS-CoV-2-uninfected individuals with the highest cross-recognition of S by flow cytometry, plus an additional four individuals, had ELISA-detectable IgG antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 S ectodomain, as well as N ( Fig. 2A and fig. S4, B to D). By contrast, none of the control samples had ELISA-detectable IgG antibodies against the less-conserved SARS-CoV-2 S1 or RBD ( Fig. 2A  and fig. S4, B to D).
The prevalence of such cross-reactive antibodies was further examined in additional healthy donor cohorts (table S1). Among 50 SARS-CoV-2-uninfected pregnant women sampled in May of 2018, five showed evidence for SARS-CoV-2 S-reactive IgG antibodies, but not IgM or IgA antibodies ( Fig. 2B and S11) that did not correlate with antibodies to the diverse viruses and bacteria also present in several of these samples. SARS-CoV-2 S-reactive IgM and IgA were also detected in two of these donors, albeit at considerably lower levels than in COVID-19 patients ( fig. S11), suggestive of recent or ongoing response. In an additional cohort of 13 donors recently infected with HCoVs, only one had SARS-CoV-2 S-reactive IgG antibodies, and these were at very low levels ( fig. S12). This suggested that their emergence was not simply a common transient event after each HCoV infection in this age group (median age 51 years; table S1). Instead, given that HCoVreactive antibodies are present in virtually all adults (3)(4)(5), the rarity of SARS-CoV-2 S crossreactivity (16 of 302; 5.29%) indicates additional requirements such as random B cell receptor repertoire focusing or frequency of HCoV infection rather than time since the last HCoV infection. Indeed, the frequency of HCoV infection displays a characteristic age distribution, being the highest in children and adolescents (1,(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). We therefore examined a cohort of younger SARS-CoV-2-uninfected healthy donors (age 1 to 16 years; table S1) sampled between 2011 and 2018. At least 21 of these 48 donors had detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 S-reactive IgG antibodies (Fig. 2, C to E), whereas only one of an additional cohort of 43 young adults (age 17 to 25 years; table S1) had such antibodies (Fig. 2F). Staining with sera from SARS-CoV-2-uninfected children and adolescents was specific to HEK293T cells expressing SARS-CoV-2 S, but not the unrelated HERV-K113 envelope glycoprotein, and was outcompeted by soluble SARS-CoV-2 S2 (fig. S13). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Sreactive IgG antibodies peaked at 62% between 6 and 16 years of age (Fig. 2F), when HCoV seroconversion in this age group also peaks (3, 4, 6, 7), and was significantly higher than in adults (P < 0.00001, Fisher's exact test).
Collectively, these findings highlight functionally relevant antigenic epitopes conserved within the S2 subunit. Over its entire length, SARS-CoV-2 S exhibits marginally closer homology with the S proteins of the betacoronaviruses HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 than with the alphacoronaviruses HCoV-NL63 and HCoV-229E ( fig. S16A). To probe shared epitopes, we constructed overlapping peptide arrays spanning the last 743 amino acids of SARS-CoV-2 S (fig. S16B). Multiple putative epitopes were differentially recognized by sera with cross-reactive antibodies (Ab + ), were reasonably conserved, and most mapped to the surface of S2 (Fig. 4, A and B, and table S2). An epitope overlapping the S2 fusion peptide was also recently identified as being cross-reactive with the corresponding peptides from HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-229E (11). Cross-reactivity with the identified epitopes was further supported by ELISAs coated with synthetic peptides (fig. S17).
As expected (3)(4)(5), reactivity with one or more HCoVs was detectable by flow cytometry in all sera ( Fig. 4D and fig. S18). However, IgG and IgA reactivity against HCoVs was higher in SARS-CoV-2-uninfected adults with SARS-CoV-2-reactive IgG compared with those without (P = 1.4 × 10 -6 for IgG and P = 0.017 for IgA, Student's t test) and in SARS-CoV-2-uninfected children or adolescents with SARS-CoV-2reactive IgG compared with those without (P = 0.010 for IgG and P = 0.021 for IgA, Student's t test) (Fig. 4D), supporting a direct link between the two. Accordingly, IgG reactivity against each HCoV type was independently correlated with the presence of SARS-CoV-2reactive antibodies (Fig. 4D).
Our results from multiple independent assays demonstrate the presence of preexisting antibodies recognizing SARS-CoV-2 in uninfected individuals. Identification of conserved epitopes in S2 targeted by neutralizing antibodies may hold promise for a universal vaccine protecting against current as well as future CoVs. Together with preexisting T cell (12)(13)(14) and B cell (10, 15) memory, antibody crossreactivity between seasonal HCoVs and SARS-CoV-2 may have important ramifications for natural infection. Epidemiological studies of HCoV transmission suggest that crossprotective immunity is unlikely to be sterilizing or long-lasting (8), which is also supported by repeated reinfection (2,16). Nevertheless, prior immunity induced by one HCoV can reduce the transmission of homologous and heterologous HCoVs and ameliorate the symptoms when transmission is not prevented (1,2). A possible modification of COVID-19 severity by prior HCoV infection may account for the age distribution of COVID-19 susceptibility, in which higher HCoV infection rates in children than in adults (4, 6) correlate with relative protection from COVID-19 (17) and may also shape seasonal and geographical patterns of transmission. It is imperative that any effect, positive or negative, of preexisting HCoV-elicited immunity on the natural course of SARS-CoV-2 infection be fully delineated.
availability: All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/. This license does not apply to figures/photos/artwork or other content included in the article that is credited to a third party; obtain authorization from the rights holder before using such material.